Search

Background: The increasing number of studies dealing with linear energy transfer (LET)-based evaluation and optimization in the field of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) indicates the rising demand for LET implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS). Benchmarking studies could play a key role in detecting (and thus preventing) computation errors prior implementing such functionalities in a TPS. Purpose: This in silico study was conducted to benchmark the following two LET-related functionalities in a commercial TPS against Monte Carlo simulations: (1) dose averaged LET (LETd) scoring and (2) physical dose filtration based on LET for future LET-based treatment plan evaluation and optimization studies. Methods: The LETd scoring and LET-based dose filtering (in which the deposited dose can be separated into the dose below and above the user specified LET threshold) functionalities for carbon ions in the research version RayStation (RS) 9A-IonPG TPS (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) were benchmarked against GATE/Geant4 simulations. Pristine Bragg peaks (BPs) and cuboid targets, positioned at different depths in a homogeneous water phantom and a setup with heterogeneity were used for this study. Results: For all setups (homogeneous and heterogeneous), the mean absolute (and relative) LETd difference was less than 1 keV/μm (3.5%) in the plateau and target and less than 2 keV/μm (8.3%) in the fragmentation tail. The maximum local differences were 4 and 6 keV/μm, respectively. The mean absolute (and relative) physical dose differences for both low- and high-LET doses were less than 1 cGy (1.5%) in the plateau, target and tail with a maximum absolute difference of 2 cGy. Conclusions: No computation error was found in the tested functionalities except for LETd in lateral direction outside the target, showing the limitation of the implemented monochrome model in the tested TPS version. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We sought to establish a conversion curve to convert the RBE-weighted doses calculated by local effect model I (LEM) (LEM RBE-weighted doses) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) to the RBE-weighted doses calculated by microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) (MKM RBE-weighted doses). We also converted the LEM dose constraints (RBE-weighted dose constraints in LEM plans) for the brain stem, spinal cord, and optic nerve based on this curve.Methods: Data from 20 patients with rNPC receiving carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in our hospital were collected. LEM in Raystation (V8A, Raystation, Sweden) was used to generate treatment plans. The clinical target volume CTV1 (GTV + 5 mm) was given 3 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Ninety-nine percent of target volumes should be covered by 95% of the prescriptions; the maximum doses of the brainstem and spinal cord were < 45 Gy (RBE) and < 30 Gy (RBE), respectively. The doses covering 20% volumes of optical nerves/chiasms D20 were < 30 Gy (RBE). Then physical doses of the LEM plans were recalculated by using MKM in Raystation to generate MKM plans. A series of conversion factors (i.e., the ratio of LEM RBE-weighted dose to MKM RBE-weighted dose) was then obtained by using an isovolumetric dose method. The LEM plan prescriptions (LEM prescription) and dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) (OAR constraints) were converted to the corresponding MKM prescriptions and dose constraints using this conversion curve.Results: For the CTV1 fractional RBE-weighted dose prescription of 3.00 Gy (RBE) and CTV2 of 2.70 Gy (RBE) in LEM plans, the conversion factors (LEM RBE-weighted dose/MKM RBE-weighted dose) were 1.37 (CI 95% 1.35-1.39) and 1.46 (1.41-1.51), respectively. The average conversion factors from 1.37 (CI 95% 1.33-1.41) to 3.09 (2.94-3.24) corresponded to the LEM fractionated doses from 2.86 Gy (RBE) to 0.24 Gy (RBE), including the doses constraining upon OARs. LEM RBE-weighted doses of 30 Gy (RBE) and 45 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions were converted to MKM RBE-weighted doses of 16.64 Gy (RBE) and 30.72 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions.Conclusions: This conversion curve could be used to convert LEM RBE-weighted doses to MKM RBE-weighted doses for patients with rNPC receiving CIRT, providing dose references for re-irradiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A RBE-weighted dose conversion curve was established for targets and OARs. • Matched with the conversion studies focusing on the targets when MKM dose >1.00 GyE. • MKM doses in targets or outside targets could be converted to LEM doses. The aim of this study was to establish curves for the conversion of RBE-weighted doses for targets and organs at risk (OARs) from the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) calculation to that of the local effect model I (LEM) for carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for prostate carcinoma (PCA). This study was performed in the experimental treatment planning system (eTPS, V8A, Raystation, Sweden), which incorporates both MKM and LEM. CIRT plans from 10 PCA patients were collected. There were 5 steps to establish the curves: (1) design MKM plans in eTPS; (2) recalculate the physical doses from MKM to LEM and create a LEM plan in eTPS; (3) plot the RBE-weighted MKM to LEM conversion curves; (4) convert the MKM rectum constraint dose volume histogram (DVH) from NIRS to a LEM DVH; and (5) compare patients' rectum DVHs and follow-up with the converted constraint DVH. The conversion factors for MKM doses of 0.18 Gy (RBE) to 4.55 Gy (RBE) per fraction to LEM doses were 2.72–1.06. For fraction sizes of >1 Gy (RBE), the conversion factors matched Fossati's curve and for fraction sizes of <1.00 Gy (RBE) the values were on the extrapolated Fossati's curve. A LEM rectum constraint DVH was established. Ten patients' rectum DVHs were all lower than LEM constraint DVHs. No complications were reported clinically. For PCA receiving CIRT, the RBE-weighted doses using MKM for targets and OARs could be converted to LEM doses using conversion curves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]