Search

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnosis and management of bacterial meningitis in adult Sudanese patients in accordance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for bacterial meningitis management., Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective study design was used to recruit all patients aged > 18 years who were diagnosed with or suspected of having bacterial meningitis and admitted to Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Gezira State, Sudan, between January 2017 and October 2022., Results: In total, 201 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 44.1 ± 21.4 years, and 107 (53.2%) were male. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis accounted for 193 (96%) of the studied patients, and only 8 (4%) of the patients had healthcare-associated meningitis. Neuroimaging was utilized appropriately in 148 (73.6%) patients, blood cultures were not performed entirely, and lumbar puncture was seldom performed in 1 (0.5%) patient. Corticosteroids were appropriately administered to 65 (32.3%) patients, and antibiotics were administered appropriately to only 5 (2.5%) patients. Ceftriaxone 185 (76.1%) was the most frequently utilized antibiotic, followed by vancomycin 23 (9.5%). In terms of overall adherence, this study demonstrated that the IDSA guidelines were not followed at all in the treatment of patients with suspected bacterial meningitis., Conclusion: The results of this study contradict the IDSA guidelines for the standard of care for bacterial meningitis. Antibiotic regimens are often incorrect, corticosteroids are administered appropriately in approximately one-third of patients, and neuroimaging is reasonably utilized. This study raises attention to several important issues regarding the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, including the lack of confirming microbiological tests and the reliance of the diagnosis primarily on CT and clinical examination., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Adequate access to drinking water for hydration and hygiene depends on many factors. We developed the Drinking Water Security Index (DWSI) to assess relative multifactorial drinking water security at different spatial and temporal scales. DWSI is a function of four key indicators of drinking water security: water quality, water accessibility, water continuity, and water availability. We built DWSI with a total of 10 variables and applied the new index in Sudan to assess historical and future drinking water security at state, local, and maternity levels. Analyses at the state level found that the Red Sea and River Nile states are most vulnerable, with the lowest DWSI for both historical and future periods. The 1 km 2 pixel level analysis shows large differences in water security within the major states. Analyses at the maternity level showed that nearly 18.97 million people are affected by the 10% of maternities with the lowest DWSI, a number projected to increase by 60% by 2030. Current and future DWSI of maternities providing Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care was assessed to identify those where urgent action is needed to ensure quality health care in water-secure conditions. This work provides useful information for stakeholders in the health and drinking water sectors in Sudan, to improve public health, reduce preventable mortality, and make the population more resilient to projected environmental changes.