Search

Objective: To examine whether a method for raising women's awareness of fetal movements, Mindfetalness, can affect pregnancy outcomes.Design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting: Sixty-seven maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden.Population: Women with singleton pregnancy with birth from 32 weeks' gestation.Methods: Women registered at a clinic randomised to Mindfetalness were assigned to receive a leaflet about Mindfetalness (n = 19 639) in comparison with routine care (n = 20 226). Data were collected from a population-based register.Main Outcome Measures: Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes after birth, visit to healthcare due to decrease in fetal movements. Other outcomes: Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes after birth, small-for-gestational-age and mode of delivery.Results: No difference (1.1 versus 1.1%, relative risk [RR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.8-1.2) was found between the Mindfetalness group and the Routine care group for a 5-minute Apgar score <7. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare more often due to decreased fetal movements (6.6 versus 3.8%, RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.57-1.87). Mindfetalness was associated with a reduction of babies born small-for-gestational-age (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00), babies born after gestational week 41+6 (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and caesarean sections (19.0 versus 20.0%, RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.99).Conclusions: Mindfetalness did not reduce the number of babies born with an Apgar score <7. However, Mindfetalness was associated with the health benefits of decreased incidence of caesarean section and fewer children born small-for-gestational-age.Tweetable Abstract: Introducing Mindfetalness in maternity care decreased caesarean sections but had no effect on the occurrence of Apgar scores <7. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the possible impact of a neutral third party on the patients’ responses to health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments.Methods: 119 patients operated at the Department of Urology in Lund with radical cystectomy and continent urinary tract reconstruction (continent cutaneous diversion or orthotopic bladder substitution) for locally advanced bladder cancer were included in the study. They were randomly divided in two groups, similar with regard to gender, age, length of follow-up, and type of reconstruction. The EORTC instruments QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BLM30 were sent to the patients. One group; “Lund patients”, received the instruments from the Department of Urology in Lund, while the other group; “Stockholm patients”, received the instruments from a neutral third party, i.e. “The Project Health and Well-Being” at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm.Results: Response rates were high in both groups, 59 out of 60 among Lund patients and 57 out of 59 among Stockholm patients. There were statistically significantly more bowel problems reported in the Stockholm patients than in the Lund patients (p<0.05) in the QLQ-C30 instrument. Regarding type of reconstruction, the Stockholm patients with continent cutaneous diversion scored higher for constipation than the Lund patients (p<0.05), and the Stockholm patients with bladder substitution scored lower for emotional functioning and higher for dyspnoea and economical problems than the Lund patients (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the Lund patients and the Stockholm patients in the QLQ-BLM30 instrument.Conclusion: Though few factors differed between the two groups, the results may indicate that different results are obtained when a study is totally administered and analyzed by a neutral third party as compared with the surgeon or his or her institution. Larger studies are needed to further test this hypothesis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]