1. Fusidic acid suspension twice daily: a new treatment schedule for skin and soft tissue infection in children, with improved tolerability.
- Author
-
Török E, Somogyi T, Rutkai K, Iglesias L, and Bielsa I
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Hungary, Infant, Male, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Prospective Studies, Skin Diseases, Bacterial pathology, Spain, Staphylococcal Skin Infections drug therapy, Staphylococcal Skin Infections pathology, Streptococcal Infections drug therapy, Streptococcal Infections pathology, Suspensions, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage, Fusidic Acid administration & dosage, Skin Diseases, Bacterial drug therapy
- Abstract
Objective: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study aimed to compare a new regimen of fusidic acid suspension against a standard regimen in children with skin and soft tissue infections., Methods: Treatment groups were given either a new regimen of fusidic acid suspension (20 mg/kg divided b.i.d.) or a standard regimen (50 mg/kg divided t.i.d.), which were administered for 5 days in both groups and for a further 5 days if evidence of infection persisted. Assessment of those cured was carried out 14 days., Results: Both regimens were effective. Cure was achieved in 194 (91.1%) of the 213 children given the new b.i.d. dosage and for 194 (89.4%) of the 217 children given the standard t.i.d. dosage (intention-to-treat population; p=0.72). Cure was maintained at the follow-up assessment for 94.8% (181 of 191) and 95.7% (180 of 188), respectively, of the children. Bacteriological cure of infections due to fusidic acid susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and/or group A beta-haemolytic streptococci, with elimination of pathogens, was achieved in all 121 (100%) children treated with the new b.i.d. regimen and in 123 (99.2%) of the 124 children treated with the standard TID regimen., Conclusion: The new twice-daily regimen had significantly better tolerance (p=0.025).
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF