Search

Background: The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed general hospitals in Spain. In response, a dedicated hospital for COVID-19 care, the Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal (HEEIZ), was established. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated at the specialized HEEIZ with those at conventional general hospitals (CGHs) in Madrid, Spain. Methods: The study was a prospective, observational cohort study including COVID-19 patients admitted to the HEEIZ and 14 CGHs (December 2020 to August 2021). Patients were assigned based on hospital preference. Clinical data were collected and analyzed using multivariate regression to assess primary and secondary outcomes, including hospital mortality, need of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and pharmacological treatments. Results: The HEEIZ cohort (n = 2997) was younger and had lower Charlson comorbidity scores than the CGH cohort (n = 1526). Adjusted HEEIZ hospital mortality was not significantly higher compared with CGHs (OR: 1.274; 95% CI: 0.781–2.079; p = 0.332). Conclusions: During the study period, patients admitted to the HEEIZ showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes, compared with patients admitted at CGHs. These results might support the use of specialized centers in managing pandemic surges, allowing CGHs to handle other needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Janus Kinase (JAK) 2 (V617F) mutation is the most frequently detected in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). JAK2(V617F) mutation displays a pro-inflammatory phenotype that may be associated to a higher risk of immune mediated diseases (IMIDs), thromboembolic complications or other cancers. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and main features of both rheumatic and non-rheumatic IMIDs in a cohort of MPNs patients with JAK2 (V617F) mutation. Study of all patients diagnosed with MPNs and JAK2 (V617F) mutation at a tertiary hospital in Northern Spain from 2004 to 2022. We focused on patients with rheumatic IMIDs to assess the time from IMIDs diagnosis to the detection of JAK2V617F mutation, the clinical course and severity of the disease, potential thrombotic complications, malignancies and therapeutic response. 130 patients (73 men/57 women; mean age, 70.1 ± 14.5 years) were identified. Fifty-four (41.5 %) patients were diagnosed with at least one IMID. The prevalence of rheumatic IMIDs was 7.7 % (n = 10), including rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4), polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 3), Sjögren syndrome (n = 1), antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1) and autoinflammatory syndrome with WDR1 mutation (n = 1). Thrombotic complications were observed in 4 of these 10 patients. The clinical course of the rheumatic IMID was mild in most cases and responded to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. One patient was successfully treated with Baricitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor. A high prevalence of rheumatic IMIDs is observed in patients with MPNs and JAK2 (V617F) mutation. JAK inhibitors might be a targeted therapy option in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Enfermería Nefrológica is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Nefrologica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study quantifies the prevalence of mental health disorders, immunosuppressive treatment adherence and identifies the treatment preferences (medical and psychological) of kidney transplant recipients [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) integrate a wide range of holistic dimensions that arenot captured within clinical outcomes. Particularly, from induction treatment to maintenance therapy, patient quality-of-life (QoL) of kidney transplant recipients have been sparsely investigated in international settings. Methods: In a prospective, multi-centric cohort study, including nine transplant centers in four countries, we explored the QoL during the year following transplantation using validated elicitation instruments (EQ-5D-3L index with VAS) in a population of kidney transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and ciclosporin), IMPD inhibitor (mycophenolate mofetil), and mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and sirolimus) were the standard-of-care (SOC) medications, together with tapering glucocorticoid therapy. We used EQ-5D and VAS data as QoL measures alongside descriptive statistics at inclusion, per country and hospital center. We computed the proportions of patients with different immunosuppressive therapy patterns, and using bivariate and multivariate analyses, assessed the variations of EQ-5D and VAS between baseline (i.e., inclusion Month 0) and follow up visits (Month 12). Results: Among 542 kidney transplant patients included and followed from November 2018 to June 2021, 491 filled at least one QoL questionnaire at least at baseline (Month 0). The majority of patients in all countries received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, ranging from 90.0% in Switzerland and Spain to 95.8% in Germany. At M12, a significant proportion of patients switched immunosuppressive drugs, with proportion varying from 20% in Germany to 40% in Spain and Switzerland. At visit M12, patients who kept SOC therapy had higher EQ-5D (by 8 percentage points, p < 0.05) and VAS (by 4 percentage points, p < 0.1) scores than switchers. VAS scores were generally lower than EQ-5D (mean 0.68 [0.5-0.8] vs. 0.85 [0.8-1]). Discussion: Although overall a positive trend in QoL was observed, the formal analyses did not show any significant improvements in EQ-5D scores or VAS. Only when the effect of a therapy use was separated from the effect of switching, the VAS score was significantly worse for switchers during the follow up period, irrespective of the therapy type. If adjusted for patient characteristics and medical history (e.g., gender, BMI, eGRF, history of diabetes), VAS and EQ-5D delivered sound PRO measures for QoL assessments during the year following renal transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Around 60% of patients with sarcoidosis requires systemic therapy. • Oral prednisolone was the most frequently prescribed agent in our cohort. • Biological therapy was necessary in about thirteen percent of our patients (12.9%). • Predictors of systemic treatment requirement were identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of systemic treatment in a cohort of sarcoidosis patients and identify presenting clinical features as predictive factors of the need for systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Retrospective study of 342 patients diagnosed and followed-up from January 1999 to December 2019 in a University Hospital in Northern Spain. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis was established according to ATS/ERS/WASOG criteria. A comparative analysis was performed between treated and untreated patients. Predictive factors of treatment prescription according to initial clinical manifestations were identified (multivariate analysis). Mean age at diagnosis was 47.7±15.1 years, with a slight female predominance (51.8%) and Caucasian majority (94.2%). The main clinical manifestation was thoracic involvement (88.3%). Extrathoracic manifestations were detected in 68.4% cases, mainly cutaneous (34.2%), articular (27.8%) and ocular (17.8%). A total of 207 (60.5%) patients required systemic treatment. Glucocorticoid therapy was the most widely used (60.5%). Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in 25.4%, more frequently MTX (21.9%). Biologic therapy was prescribed in 12.9%, especially adalimumab (9.1%). Male gender (OR: 1.65; 95%CI: 1.06–2.56), intrathoracic (OR: 2.41; 95%CI: 1.22–4.76), ocular (OR: 4.14; 95%CI: 2.01–8.52), parotid (OR: 1.60; 95%CI: 1.39–1.94), neurological (OR: 5.00; 95%CI: 1.68–14.84), and renal (OR: 1.59; 95%CI: 1.38–1.94) involvement were identified as risk factors associated with the need of systemic treatment. Most patients (60.5%) of sarcoidosis in our series required systemic therapy. An association between certain characteristics at initial presentation (male gender, lung, ocular, parotid, neurological and renal involvement) and the need of systemic treatment was identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy and safety of high versus medium doses of glucocorticoids for the treatment of patients with COVID‐19 has shown mixed outcomes in controlled trials and observational studies. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of methylprednisolone 250 mg bolus versus dexamethasone 6 mg in patients with severe COVID‐19. Methods: A randomised, open‐label, controlled trial was conducted between February and August 2021 at four hospitals in Spain. The trial was suspended after the first interim analysis since the investigators considered that continuing the trial would be futile. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive dexamethasone 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days or methylprednisolone 250 mg once daily for 3 days. Results: Of the 128 randomised patients, 125 were analysed (mean age 60 ± 17 years; 82 males [66%]). Mortality at 28 days was 4.8% in the 250 mg methylprednisolone group versus 4.8% in the 6 mg dexamethasone group (absolute risk difference, 0.1% [95% CI, −8.8 to 9.1%]; p = 0.98). None of the secondary outcomes (admission to the intensive care unit, non‐invasive respiratory or high‐flow oxygen support, additional immunosuppressive drugs, or length of stay), or prespecified sensitivity analyses were statistically significant. Hyperglycaemia was more frequent in the methylprednisolone group at 27.0 versus 8.1% (absolute risk difference, −18.9% [95% CI, −31.8 to ‐ 5.6%]; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Among severe but not critical patients with COVID‐19, 250 mg/d for 3 days of methylprednisolone compared with 6 mg/d for 10 days of dexamethasone did not result in a decrease in mortality or intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To analyse the prevalence, the clinical characteristics, the overall survival and the event-free survival (EFS) of SSc patients who express anti-U11/U12 RNP (RNPC-3) antibodies. Methods A total of 447 SSc patients from Barcelona (n  = 286) and Milan (n  = 161) were selected. All samples were tested using a particle-based multi-analyte technology. We compared anti-RNPC-3 positive and negative patients. Epidemiological, clinical features and survival were analysed. End-stage lung disease (ESLD) was defined if the patient developed forced vital capacity <50% of predicted, needed oxygen therapy or lung transplantation. EFS was defined as the period of time free of either ESLD or death. Results Nineteen of 447 (4.3%) patients had anti-RNPC-3 antibodies and interstitial lung disease (ILD) was more frequent (11, 57.9% vs 144, 33.6%, P  =0.030) in individuals with anti-RNPC-3 antibodies. More patients reached ESLD in the positive group (7, 36.8% vs 74, 17.3%, P  = 0.006), and a higher use of non-glucocorticoid immunosuppressive drugs was observed (11, 57.9% vs 130, 30.4%, P  = 0.012). Anti-RNPC-3 positive patients had lower EFS, both in the total cohort (log-rank P  =0.001), as well as in patients with ILD (log-rank P  = 0.002). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, diffuse cutaneous subtype, age at onset, the presence of ILD or pulmonary arterial hypertension and the expression of anti-RNPC-3 positivity or anti-topo I were independently associated with worse EFS. Conclusion The presence of anti-RNPC-3 was associated with higher frequency of ILD and either ESLD or death. These data suggest anti-RNPC-3 is an independent poor prognosis antibody in SSc, especially if ILD is also present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and objective: Tocilizumab is an IL‐6 receptor inhibitor agent which has been proposed as a candidate to stop the inflammatory phase of infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). However, safety data of tocilizumab in pregnant women and their newborn are scarce. We aimed to describe maternal and neonatal safety outcomes associated with tocilizumab treatment in pregnant women with severe COVID‐19. Methods: This is a retrospective study of severe COVID‐19 pregnant women, treated with tocilizumab in two Spanish hospitals between 1 March and 31 April 2020. Demographics, medical history, clinical and radiologic findings, treatment information and laboratory data of mothers and their newborns were collected from electronic medical records. Results and discussion: A total of 12 pregnant women were identified to have received tocilizumab during pregnancy in the two hospitals. Median gestational age at admission was 27.7 weeks (interquartile range, 18.0–36.4). Most of them received lopinavir/ritonavir, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine, two patients received corticosteroids and one received interferon beta 1B. All 12 pregnancies resulted in live births. Somatometric values were normal for all newborns, and evolution at 14 and 28 days was favourable for all of them. Hepatotoxicity was observed in 2 patients, which improved or resolved at discharge. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was detected in another patient who had also received corticosteroids for 15 days, causing a congenital infection in her newborn. Both hepatotoxicity and viral reactivation adverse events were classified as possibly related to tocilizumab administration according to Naranjo's causality algorithm. What is new and conclusions: It does not appear that tocilizumab has detrimental effects for the mother and newborn. Close monitoring of infections should be considered, especially if other immunosuppressive agents are used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older age has been reported as a risk factor for severe SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19). The impact of immunosuppressants (IMS) on COVID-19 is still under debate. Aim: To describe the incidence and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in relation to the use of IMS. Methods: IBD patients over 65 years of age were selected and grouped in terms of IMS use. Confirmed COVID-19, adherence to IST, comorbidities and concomitant non-IBD-related treatments between 1st of March 2020 to 1st of March 2021 were recorded. Results: Out of 418 patients included, 89 (21.3%) were on IMS. Thirty-two patients (7.7%) had COVID-19, 7 of whom were on IMS (7.6% not on IMS vs. 7.9% on IMS; P = 0.933) and 7 (22%) patients died. Conclusions: Incidence of COVID-19 among elderly IBD patients was similar to that reported in the background population, regardless of the use of IMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Increasing the interval of administration of anti-TNF agents over the duration specified in the data sheet is not common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of IBD patients treated with this strategy.Methods: Patients with IBD who were treated with infliximab or adalimumab at intervals > 8 weeks or > 2 weeks, respectively, because of persistent clinical remission, were identified at local databases of the ENEIDA registry (a nationwide registry promoted by the Spanish Working Group in Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis-GETECCU) of two referral centers. Treatment success was considered if patients remained in clinical remission with the same schedule or without biological therapy at the end of follow-up, and if no return to the conventional schedule, dose-escalation, change in biological agent, or a course of systemic corticosteroids or surgery were required.Results: Eighty-five patients were included, 60 treated with infliximab and 25 with adalimumab. The spaced schedule was initiated after a median of 25 months on anti-TNF treatment (IQR 14-49). Throughout a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 21-47), fifty patients (59%) fulfilled the success criteria of the spaced strategy. No differences were found regarding type of IBD or anti-TNF agent. Baseline C-reactive protein levels and disease duration at the time of starting anti-TNF treatment were the only factors associated with treatment success.Conclusions: Anti-TNF administration at longer intervals than those provided in the data sheet may be an efficacious, convenient, and cheaper treatment option, particularly in patients in whom anti-TNF treatment was initiated early. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) with high disease activity compared with fingolimod, from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) in Spain.Methods: A Markov model was developed. The annual transition probabilities, were adjusted to patients with RMS with high disease activity. The effect of the treatments compared on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was modeled by hazard ratios for the confirmed progression of disability. The annual relapse rate and the probability of suffering adverse reactions were obtained from a meta-analysis and the literature. The derived costs were calculated from Spanish unit costs. The utilities were obtained from the CLARITY clinical trial and the literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were performed.Results: Cladribine tablets was the dominant treatment: lower costs (-86,536 €) and more effective (+1.11 quality-adjusted life years - QALYs) compared to fingolimod. The probability that Cladribine Tablets was cost-effective compared to fingolimod ranged between 94.6% and 96.1% for willingness to pay from € 20,000 to € 30,000 per QALY gained.Conclusions: Cladribine Tablets is a cost-effective treatment, compared to fingolimod, for the treatment of RMS with high disease activity.Expert Opinion: According to the present study, compared to fingolimod, treatment with Cladribine Tablets of relapsing multiple sclerosis with high disease activity is an option that could generate savings for the Spanish National Health System, with a considerable gain in QALYs. Cladribine Tablets is considered cost-effective and dominant (less costs and more effectiveness) than fingolimod treatment option in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Almost one third of patients with Behçet's syndrome (BS) display vascular involvement. However, data regarding the prevalence and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in BS are scanty. We assessed the differential characteristics between patients with and without VTE and the factors associated with VTE incidence. A case-control study in a cohort of patients with BS was performed. 57 patients were included (56.1% women) with a mean follow-up of 10.56 (± 10.7) years. Mean age at diagnosis of BS and diagnosis of the first VTE episode was 34.7 (± 12.1) and 31.2 (± 8.9) years, respectively. Erythema nodosum (OR 4.6, CI 95% 1.2-18.1) and fever (OR 8.2, CI 95% 1.6-42.1) were associated with a higher risk of VTE. 26 episodes of VTE were registered in 12/57 (21%) patients. 83.3% of patients were not diagnosed with BS when the first episode of VTE occurred and, among them, the episode of VTE led to the diagnosis of BS in 40% of cases. Half of patients had at least one VTE recurrence. The absence of immunosuppressive treatment was associated with a higher risk of developing a first episode of VTE (OR 20 CI 95% 19.2-166.6). All patients were treated with anticoagulation and 75% were treated with immunosuppressants after the first VTE event. The diagnosis of VTE usually precedes that of BS, with a high frequency of VTE recurrence. Erythema nodosum and fever were associated with a higher risk of VTE, while the immunosuppressants showed a protective role for the development of VTE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefits of immunosuppressants for sustaining remission and preventing flares of IBD are well known. However, optimal timing for withdrawal has not been determined.Aims: The objective of this study was to calculate the risk of relapse and predictors after withdrawal of azathioprine (AZA) monotherapy in patients who sustain deep remission.Methods: This was a multicenter observational study of patients with IBD in remission whose immunosuppressant had been withdrawn. We recorded demographic variables, disease data, laboratory values, and the results of imaging tests performed at withdrawal and, in patients who relapsed, time to relapse and the efficacy of reintroducing the drug.Results: Ninety-five patients were included (35 UC and 60 CD). The mean duration of AZA treatment was 87 and 77 months for UC and CD, respectively. Endoscopic remission was evaluated in 23 patients with UC and 35 with CD. After AZA withdrawal, 91% patients with UC and 67% with CD received high doses of salicylates. A total of 26 patients relapsed. The cumulative relapse rate at 5 years was 46% for CD and UC. AZA was reintroduced in 19 patients, of whom 14 responded. Predictors of relapse were corticosteroid dependence, early introduction of AZA (CD), and late introduction of AZA (UC).Conclusions: Almost half of the patients in whom AZA was withdrawn were in remission at 5 years. The candidates for withdrawal could be better identified based on corticosteroid dependence, previous surgery, timing of initiation, and indication for AZA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dear editor, Vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cardiovascular risk factors is well known. On average, the patients who died were older (mean age: 76.6 years) than the patients who survived (mean age: 65.7 years; mean difference 10.97; 95% CI: 7.86-14.08; I P i < 0.001). To conclude, we unanticipatedly found a low proportion of patients with prior immunosuppressive therapy, did not observe any patients taking biologics and could not find significant differences in mortality rates with regards to prior treatment with immunosuppressants among COVID-19 inpatients. [Extracted from the article]

Objective To assess the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis. Methods We conducted a multicenter study of patients with JIA-associated uveitis that was refractory to conventional immunosuppressive drugs and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Results We assessed 25 patients (21 female; 47 affected eyes) with a mean ± SD age of 18.5 ± 8.3 years. Uveitis was bilateral in 22 patients. Cystoid macular edema was present in 9 patients. Ocular sequelae found at initiation of TCZ included cataracts (n = 13), glaucoma (n = 7), synechiae (n = 10), band keratopathy (n = 12), maculopathy (n = 9), and amblyopia (n = 5). Before TCZ, patients had received corticosteroids, conventional immunosuppressive drugs, and biologic agents (median 2 [range 1-5]), including adalimumab (n = 24), etanercept (n = 8), infliximab (n = 7), abatacept (n = 6), rituximab (n = 2), anakinra (n = 1), and golimumab (n = 1). Patients received 8 mg/kg TCZ intravenously every 4 weeks in most cases. TCZ yielded rapid and maintained improvement in all ocular parameters. After 6 months of therapy, 79.2% of patients showed improvement in anterior chamber cell numbers, and 88.2% showed improvement after 1 year. Central macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in patients with cystoid macular edema decreased from a mean ± SD of 401.7 ± 86.8 μm to 259.1 ± 39.5 μm after 6 months of TCZ ( P = 0.012). The best-corrected visual acuity increased from 0.56 ± 0.35 to 0.64 ± 0.32 ( P < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 12 months, visual improvement persisted, and complete remission of uveitis was observed in 19 of 25 patients. Significant reduction in the prednisone dosage was also achieved. The main adverse effects were severe autoimmune thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, pneumonia and then autoimmune anemia and thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, and viral conjunctivitis and bullous impetigo in 1 patient. Conclusion TCZ appears to be a useful therapy for severe refractory JIA-associated uveitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are numerous clinical trials proving efficacy and safety profiles of etanercept. Newer studies, however, include patients with significant comorbidities, unstable psoriasis, or concomitant treatments.Objective: The objective of this study was to provide data on long-term response to etanercept and estimate the cost in daily practice.Methods: This is an observational retrospective study including patients with plaque-type psoriasis receiving etanercept 50 mg/wk for more than 6 months at the Dermatology Department of the University Hospital of La Coruña (Spain). Psoriasis severity was determined using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline and then at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and annually until treatment discontinuation.Results: A total of 102 patients aged 24 to 78 years were included. Response rates of 58.8% and 66.3% for PASI 75 score (reduction of at least 75% in PASI score compared with baseline) were achieved after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. Among patients who continued treatment, the PASI 75 score was maintained by 75.3% at 1 year, 82.5% at 2 years, and 88.2% at 3 years. The percentage of patients receiving other systemic treatments was 38.2%. Adverse effects were reported in 13.7%, all of them mild, except one case of urinary sepsis. The average cost per patient was €244.68 ± €45.27 per week and €34.95 ± €6.46 per day.Conclusions: We provide data on long-term response to etanercept and its costs in a real-world setting. Response rates were higher than in some clinical trials, with progressive efficacy and not related to body mass index. Etanercept cost was comparable with that estimated in other studies. Combination with a conventional systemic agent can enhance efficacy without additional adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to know the epidemiology and the changes of antifungal resistance in invasive candidiasis (IC) we carried out this prospective study of Candida strains belonging to patients admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals from June 2011 to June 2012 diagnosed with IC. Clinical information and the identity of the Candida species were collected and antifungal susceptibility was tested using broth microdilution in five agents: amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin and anidulafungin. A total of 705 cases-isolates were documented. Most of the patients suffered from candidemia and several underlying diseases and more than half of them were neutropenic or under immunosuppressive therapy, factors associated with higher mortality. Thirty percent of global mortality was documented. C. albicans was the most frequently isolated species, although an increase of non- C. albicans species was observed. Resistance to fluconazole was of 3.4%, lower than in previous years (6.3%). C. parapsilosis presented a higher MIC 90 of echinocandins compared to other species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This phase I trial assessed safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sorafenib plus ifosfamide in patients with advanced sarcoma. Methods Twelve sarcoma patients (9 soft-tissue, 3 bone sarcoma) were treated with sorafenib plus ifosfamide (starting doses 200 mg bid and 6 g/m respectively). A 3 + 3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. A study to assess the in vitro efficacy of the combination was also conducted. Results Three DLTs were observed: fatigue grade 4 with sorafenib 400 mg bid plus ifosfamide 6 g/m and encephalopathy and emesis grade 3 with sorafenib 400 mg bid plus ifosfamide 7.5 g/m. Other toxicities included diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, neutropenia, skin rash and thrombocytopenia. There were no relevant effects on PK of sorafenib but an increase in ifosfamide active metabolite 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide was observed. Eight patients achieved stable disease lasting more than 12 weeks. An additive effect was observed in vitro. Conclusions RD was sorafenib 400 mg bid plus ifosfamide 6 g/m, allowing administration of active doses of both agents. Limited preliminary antitumor activity was also observed. A phase II study is currently ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Doxorubicin/ifosfamide is a first-line systemic chemotherapy for the majority of advanced sot tissue sarcoma (ASTS) subtypes. Trabectedin is indicated for the treatment of ASTS after failure of anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide; however it is being increasingly used of-label as a first-line treatment. This study estimated the cost effectiveness of these two treatments in the first-line management of ASTS in Italy, Spain, and Sweden. Methods. A Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost effectiveness of doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy, defined as the cost per QALY gained, in each country. Results. First-line treatment with doxorubicin/ifosfamide resulted in lower two-year healthcare costs and more QALYs than first-line treatment with trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a cost per QALY threshold of €35,000, >90% of a cohort would be cost effectively treated with doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries. Conclusion. Within the model's limitations, first-line treatment of patients with ASTS with doxorubicin/ifosfamide instead of trabectedin monotherapy affords a cost-effective use of publicly funded healthcare resources in Italy, Spain, and Sweden and is therefore the preferred treatment in all three countries. These findings support the recommendation that trabectedin should remain a second-line treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective-To compare the effects of calcitonin, etidronate, and alendronate in preventing bone loss during the first 2 years after heart transplant. Methods-A total of 222 heart transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 52.4 [10] years, 85% male) were evaluated. Patients with normal bone mineral density (reference group, n = 102) received 1000 mg/d calcium plus 800 IU/d vitamin D3. The rest were assigned to 200 IU/d of calcitonin (n=42), 400 mg/d etidronate orally for 14 days quarterly (n = 33), or 10 mg/d alendronate (n = 45). All patients received calcium and vitamin D. Bone mineral density was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine, the entire femur, and the femoral neck at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after transplant. Results-At 2 years after transplant, bone mineral density in the lumbar spine had decreased in the reference group (-3.07%), calcitonin group (-0.93%), and etidronate group (-1.87%) but not in the alendronate group (+4.9%; P< .001). After 2 years, bone mineral density in the entire femur decreased in all groups (-3.2% in the reference group, -3.6% in the calcitonin group, -4.6% in the etidronate group, and -0.5% in the alendronate group) but bone loss was significantly lower in the alendronate group (P< .001). Bone mineral density in the femoral neck also decreased in all groups. The incidence of vertebral fractures did not differ among groups. Adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusions-Alendronate therapy in heart transplant recipients was associated with a significant increase in bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and less bone loss at the hip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess maternal, neonatal and graft outcomes after pregnancy in patients with kidney transplantation, and to compare the immunosuppressive therapies used. Methods: Review of 29 pregnancies in 23 patients with kidney transplantation, managed at La Fe University Hospital, Valencia. Immunosuppressive therapies with Cyclosporine-A, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil and Azathioprine were compared. Results: No statistical differences were found in perinatal or maternal complications, with respect to the immunosuppressive therapy used. There were no differences between therapy and graft survival. Maternal complications occurred in 25 out of 28 deliveries. The most common were anemia (75%) and hypertension (53.6%). Of the 29 pregnancies, 26 were live deliveries, two were stillbirths and one was a miscarriage. The median birth weight of newborns was 2650 g (900-4350 g). From the 28 deliveries, maternal complications were reported in 25 patients. Perinatal complications were recorded in 55.6% of the patients, with prematurity being the most common (44.4%) type. One malformation was reported, this was a cleft palate in a 25 year old patient who was treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusion: Pregnancies in patients with kidney transplantation should be considered high-risk pregnancies because of the higher rate of maternal and perinatal complications. Immunosuppressive therapies have not shown differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Morales JM, Varo E, Lázaro P. Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain. Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01544.x. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: To assess the adherence to immunosuppressant therapy (IST) and perceived barriers affecting IST adherence and quality of life (QOL) in patients who had received a renal (RT) or liver transplant (LT), a questionnaire was sent to over 9000 RT and LT recipients in Spain. Questionnaire comprised questions about patient's socio-demographic, organ transplant and medication characteristics; IST adherence and patient's perceived barriers to adherence; and patient's QOL using the EuroQol. Data from 1983 RT patients and 1479 LT patients were analyzed. Self-reported adherence to IST in RT (92.6%) and LT (88.5%) recipients was high. Daily medication intake (mean of 2-3 doses/d per patient) was considered a lifestyle restriction in about 25% of transplant recipients and was the most common barrier to adherence perceived by over 30% of RT and LT patients. Overall, high-intensity treatment regimens were associated with poorer QOL (EuroQol <70) compared with low-intensity treatment regimens. Most RT (71.0%) and LT (61.4%) patients would prefer to suppress the evening dose if they were able to. Although high adherence rates to IST were reported in this first large Spanish survey in RT and LT patients, adjustment of daily treatment intensity by less frequent dosing may be an adequate strategy to minimize barriers to adherence and improve QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: To explore the main factors that make it difficult to empirically monitor tacrolimus (TAC) in the early period post-liver transplantation (LTx), with a specific focus on those aspects related to patient idiosyncrasy and clinical status as well as to the pharmacokinetic (PK) assumptions on which drug individualization in clinical practice is based. Methods: Retrospective monitoring data from 75 de novo liver transplant patients treated with twice daily with TAC and followed for up to 15 days were analyzed. An extensive battery of laboratory measurements were available. Dose adjustment was performed empirically using trough levels (C). The population was separated into two major background groups according to low or high values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (Group 1 and 2, respectively) based on AST measurements made during the first 4 days post-LTx. Each of these two major groups was then further subdivided into two subgroups based on elevated (Groups 1A, 2A) or reduced (Groups 1B, 2B) combined albumin (cut-off 2.5 g/dl) and hematocrit (cut-off 28%). Results: The C/Dose ratio [inversely proportional to systemic clearance (CL)] had a variability [coefficient of variation (CV) >80%) that was incongruently higher for the ratio than for C and Dose separately. This was attributed to most patients not being at steady state or physiologically stable in the early post-LTx period. Group 1 patients were more predictable than Group 2 patients, who were responsible for the variability in the ratio. C was lower in the reduced ALB and HCT patient groups when AST conditions were similar (1A vs. 1B and 2A vs. 2B), likely due to increased TAC metabolic clearance (reduced C/Dose). This situation existed for two periods: 0-15 days post-LTx and 4-15 days post-LTx observations. Group 2A patients were the main source of the paradoxical variability in C/Dose (higher ratio of 2.7; CV = 100%), suggesting a lower clearance and difficulty in the recovery of stability. In contrast, Group 2B patients had the lower ratio (1.4; 47%) but required the highest number of dose adjustments as the variability was hard to identify clinically. Group 1A patients were the most predictable empirically. When observations from 15 new patients who entered the clinic in 2007 and 2008 were used for the analysis, the same sub-groups existed in the same proportions in both years. Conclusion: The difficulty in empirical dose adjustment of TAC is associated to the inevitable non-fulfillment of PK assumptions early post-LTx and also to the inherent complexity of the clinical condition, leading to increased uncertainty for the clinician regarding dose selection. Identifying these sub-categories provides a rational means of classifying patients akin to a phenotype. The complexity of the kinetics in LTx and TAC treatment does not invalidate C as a biomarker, but a Bayes algorithm including a full PK structure and these covariates would be optimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:Cell transplantation strategies are gaining increasing interest for spinal cord injury (SCI) with the objective of promoting spinal cord repair. To avoid allogenic graft rejection, an adequate immune suppression is required, and one of the most potent and commonly used immunosuppressives is cyclosporin A (CsA). In SCI, permanent sensory motor loss is combined with modifications of drug absorption, distribution and elimination.Objectives:The objectives of this study were to thoroughly explore histological and functional outcomes of CsA treatment in a rat model of spinal cord compression.Setting:Experiments were carried out at the Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (France), the Integrative Biology of Neurodegeneration Laboratory (Spain) and in the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (Switzerland) for CsA blood concentration determination.Methods:We first evaluated histological outcomes of CsA treatment on kidneys and spinal cord after SCI. We then investigated whether SCI modified CsA blood concentration. Finally, using behavioral analysis, we assessed the potential CsA impact on functional recovery.Results:When spinal-cord-injured rats were treated with a CsA dose of 10 mg kg−1 per day, we observed deleterious effects on kidneys, associated with modifications of CsA blood concentration. Adding an antibiotic treatment reduced kidney alteration without modifying CsA blood concentration. Finally, we showed that CsA treatment per se modified neither functional recovery nor lesion extension.Conclusion:This study pinpoints the absolute requirement of careful CsA monitoring in the clinical setting for patients with SCI to minimize potential unexpected effects and avoid therapeutic failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aflatoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2) are immunosuppressant, mutagenic, teratogenic and carcinogenic agents with a widespread presence in foodstuffs. Since human exposure to aflatoxins occurs primarily by contaminated food intake, and given the greater susceptibility of infants to their adverse effects, the quantification of these mycotoxins in infant food based on cereals is of relevance. Aflatoxin levels were determined in 91 Spanish infant cereals classified in terms of non- and organically produced and several types from 10 different manufacturers, using a extraction procedure followed by inmunoaffinity column clean-up step and HPLC with fluorescence detection (FLD) and post-column derivatisation (Kobra Cell system). Daily aflatoxin intake was also assessed. Preliminary analysis showed a valuable incidence of detected infant cereal samples at an upper concentration level than the detection limit for total aflatoxin (66%), corresponding to a 46, 40, 34 and 11% for AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2, respectively. Lower aflatoxin values (median, Q1, Q3) in conventional infant cereal (n = 74, AFB1:

To evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) after renal transplantation we established a CVD database (no-intervention) including all patients transplanted among 2000–2002 in 14 hospitals from Spain (Renal Forum Group) (n=2600). They were prospective followed annually thereafter and we present herein the most important results concerning survival figures and CVD at four years. Mean recipient age was 49.7±13.7 years: 16% retransplanted and 12.5% hyperimmunized. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was used in 63%. Acute rejection (AR) rate at 1 year was 14.8%. Graft and patient survival at 48 months were 85.6% (death censored) and 91.7% respectively. The first cause of graft loss was vascular in the first year, death with function during the 2–3 years, and chronic allograft nephropathy at the 4th year. Donor age, time on dialysis, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), AR, SCr at 6 months, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers in the first year, and systolic blood pressure at 24 months were independent risk factors for graft loss at 4th year. The first cause of death was CVD (predominantly ischemic heart disease (IHD) in the first year). Recipient age, ATN, and SCr at 6 months were independent predictors of mortality. Despite worsening of donor age, comorbidity, and advanced age of recipients, survival figures at four years are considered good in our Spanish non-selected population. Cardiovascular mortality is the most important cause of death and graft loss particularly, IHD in the first year. Therefore, to decrease post-transplant mortality a careful cardiovascular evaluation and treatment in the waiting list and a close follow-up of patients after transplantation is mandatory.Kidney International (2008) 74, S94–S99. doi:10.1038/ki.2008.547 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study assessed pharmacoeconomic costs associated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with other available second-line therapies for chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGvHD) in a tertiary Spanish institution., Methods: Patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with steroid-refractory cGvHD were eligible. Data were collected retrospectively from index date until 1 year or relapse. Patients were distributed in two cohorts (ECP vs non-ECP), matched by age (≤ or > 40), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HLA-identical sibling donor or other) and number of previous immunosuppressive lines (1, 2, or ≥ 3). Costs were assigned using the 2016 diagnosis-related group (DRG) system: DRG 579 (€22 383) overnight stay due to major complication (ie, sepsis, pneumonia, parenteral nutrition, or respiratory failure), and DRG 875 (€5154) if no major complication. The primary endpoint was healthcare resource utilization per patient., Results: Forty patients (n = 20 per cohort) were included. Median age was 49, and 37.5% were female. Mean total cost per patient was €25 319 (95% CI: €17 049-€33 590) across the two cohorts, with a slightly lower mean cost per ECP-treated patient (€23 120) compared with the non-ECP cohort (€27 519; P = .597). Twenty-seven inpatient hospitalizations occurred among ECP-treated patients, vs 33 in the non-ECP cohort. Day hospital and external consultations were more frequent in the ECP cohort. However, fewer inpatient admissions included DRG 579 compared with the non-ECP cohort (44% vs 58%). Inpatient length of stay was slightly shorter in the ECP cohort (30 vs 49 days; P = .298)., Conclusions: ECP treatment may yield economic savings in Spain through resource savings and moving costs toward outpatient care., (© 2021 Hospital Universitari i Politechnic La Fe. Journal of Clinical Apheresis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The authors discuss a case of a 79-year-old woman with a 3-year history of rheumatoid arthritis who was treated with bisphosphonate therapy after which she developed spontaneous osteonecrosis of the right jaw (ONJ). She was treated with teriparatide for 8 months but her condition did not improve. Teriparatide is generally used in treatment of ONJ, however, the lack of response to teriparatide in this case could be attributed to the immunosuppressive drugs used to treat her rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: Registry studies broadly describing the safety of systemic drugs in psoriasis are needed., Objective: To describe the safety findings of the systemic drugs acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, cyclosporine, etanercept, infliximab, methotrexate, secukinumab, and ustekinumab used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events for Biological Therapy in Dermatological Diseases (BIOBADADERM) Registry., Methods: The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR (including propensity scores) of identified adverse events for each drug, using methotrexate as reference, were determined by means of a prospective cohort., Results: Our study included 2845 patients (8954 treatment cycles; 9642 patient-years). Ustekinumab and secukinumab had the lowest rate of adverse events for several of the system organ classes, with a statistically significant decreased rate ratio (IRR of <1), whereas cyclosporine and infliximab had the highest, with an increased rate ratio (IRR of ≥5)., Limitations: Observational study, drug allocation not randomized, depletion of susceptibles, and prescribed doses not registered., Conclusion: Our data provide comparative safety information in the real-life setting that could help clinicians selecting between available products., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background. Steroids are largely effective for the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant patients, but cause severe side effects. Whether steroid withdrawal confers long-term beneficial effects remains unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The article provides information on the outcomes of renal transplantation in Spain. It states that the new immunosuppressants permitted reduced the occurrence of acute rejection. It discusses the importance of evaluating how these changes affect the patients and their survival. It mentions that the Allograft Dsyfunction Study Group was created to monitor the modifications in the donor and recipient characteristics and the changes on treatments in Spain.

Background: The objectives of this epidemiological, prospective study were to describe the characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in heart transplant (HT) recipients and to identify the variables that may influence the development of CMV viremia and CMV disease in these patients., Methods: HT recipients ≥18 years of age (n=199) were included in the study. Variables studied included CMV serostatus, immunosuppressive treatment, and administration of anti-CMV prophylaxis., Results: The mean age of the population was 52 years, and 84% were males. Immunosuppressive regimens were administered as induction therapy to 92.5% of patients; 88.5% of patients received calcineurin inhibitors as maintenance therapy. Anti-CMV treatment was given to 59% of 199 patients as prophylaxis (70%), preemptive therapy (10%), or to treat CMV infection (20%). Overall, 43% of patients had at least 1 positive viremia test. No patient with a high-risk serostatus (donor+/recipient-) receiving prophylaxis developed CMV syndrome, and only 2.5% of 199 patients developed CMV invasive disease. Multivariate analysis showed that having a positive donor CMV serostatus was associated with an increased risk of developing CMV viremia (P<0.012), while use of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk (P=0.005)., Conclusions: In a population of HT recipients, the CMV infection rate was similar to that seen in previous studies, but the progression to overt CMV disease was very low. Having a CMV-positive donor was identified as an independent risk factor for developing CMV viremia, while the use of mTOR inhibitors was protective against viremia., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)