Search

Copyright of Cuestiones Políticas is the property of Revista Cuestiones Politicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studia Migracyjne Przegląd Polonijny is the property of Wydzial Studiow Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych UJ oraz Polska Akademia Umiejetnosci and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho UNED is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental is the property of Universitat Rovira I Virgili and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho UNED is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This research focuses on an analysis of the sociological variables that affect the way that custody is awarded after a marital breakup, specifically after the divorce of married heterosexual couples. A quantitative methodology has been used based on Statistics on Annulments, Separations and Divorces and data for various rates in Autonomous Communities gathered from the Spanish National Statistics Institute (INE). The main obtained results confirm that these variables have a significant effect on the way that child custody is awarded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The person constitutes the supreme good of the right, it is considered the end and the middle of this. This ancient and limited protection of the person began in the field of public law, with solemn statements in constitutions and declarations of human rights (American cases of 1776, and French, of 1789), and through administrative and law law Criminal, which was insufficient when not effective. The civil systems for a long time limited their guardianship to the simple compensation when there were damages derived directly from an injury or one of those physical and spiritual manifestations of the person, which also left a broad Unprotected field. This led to the encouragement of the civil legislator the need to regulate the rights of personality and its special tutelage from a new and broader perspective, sometimes in a unitary way, although not always total or omnicompresiva. So he tried, with surprising sense of anticipation and modernity, the first project of Spanish Civil Code, of 1821, influenced by the political philosophy of the Constitution of Cadiz. Then, and with the antecedent of the Portuguese Civil Code, of 1867, it deals with the partial issue and still poorly, the German BGB and the Swiss code, and more recently the Italian of 1942, more broadly and mode Keywords: right, person, protection of the person, right of damages, damages to the persons, but not complete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some scholars have presented codification as a means to both nationalise and denationalise European legal traditions. This seems to be a paradox. On the one hand, the fact that laws needed to be approved by national parliaments and theius commune– which was somehow regarded as a foreign law – ceased to be in force, gives evidence of how much codification contributed to the nationalisation of law. On the other hand, the fact that national parliaments enacted codes whose content had been highly influenced by foreign codes reveals that codification also contributed to the denationalisation of law. Different perspectives and arguments may lead to completely opposite outcomes. This debate has been particularly present in the Spanish scholarship. In the end, it seems that the view of codification as a means of denationalisation of law has prevailed, giving either a biased and partisan view of codification, or simplifying its richness. The consequences of such an approach have been notable in describing the codification of all legal branches, particularly in the civil law domain. After the Introduction (I), the paper will explore the Spanish historiography on this matter in a European context (II.1), paying particular attention to Belgium (II.2) and Romania (II.3). I will finish with some concluding considerations (III). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (00347922) is the property of Editorial Reus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Firstly, the authors of this article put forward the rules of the Spanish General Commission of Codification, to review its origin, evolution and functions, as well as its internal organization and operation. Secondly, they analyze the contents and the principles that have inspired the different reform proposals that the General Commission of Codification has made for the modernization of the Contract Law, especially the recent Propuesta de Anteproyecto de Ley de modernización del Derecho de obligacionesy contratos de 2009. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Firstly, the authors of this article put forward the rules of the Spanish General Commission of Codification, to review its origin, evolution and functions, as well as its internal organization and operation. Secondly, they analyze the contents and the principles that have inspired the different reform proposals that the General Commission of Codification has made for the modernization of the Contract Law, especially the recent Propuesta de Anteproyecto de Ley de modernización del Derecho de obligacionesy contratos de 2009. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]