1. Chiari malformation Type I surgery in pediatric patients. Part 1: validation of an ICD-9-CM code search algorithm.
- Author
-
Ladner TR, Greenberg JK, Guerrero N, Olsen MA, Shannon CN, Yarbrough CK, Piccirillo JF, Anderson RC, Feldstein NA, Wellons JC 3rd, Smyth MD, Park TS, and Limbrick DD Jr
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Databases, Factual, False Negative Reactions, Female, Humans, Infant, International Classification of Diseases, Male, Midwestern United States, New England, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Southeastern United States, Treatment Outcome, Algorithms, Arnold-Chiari Malformation surgery, Decompression, Surgical, Laminectomy
- Abstract
OBJECTIVE Administrative billing data may facilitate large-scale assessments of treatment outcomes for pediatric Chiari malformation Type I (CM-I). Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code algorithms for identifying CM-I surgery are critical prerequisites for such studies but are currently only available for adults. The objective of this study was to validate two ICD-9-CM code algorithms using hospital billing data to identify pediatric patients undergoing CM-I decompression surgery. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed the validity of two ICD-9-CM code algorithms for identifying pediatric CM-I decompression surgery performed at 3 academic medical centers between 2001 and 2013. Algorithm 1 included any discharge diagnosis code of 348.4 (CM-I), as well as a procedure code of 01.24 (cranial decompression) or 03.09 (spinal decompression or laminectomy). Algorithm 2 restricted this group to the subset of patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of 348.4. The positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity of each algorithm were calculated. RESULTS Among 625 first-time admissions identified by Algorithm 1, the overall PPV for CM-I decompression was 92%. Among the 581 admissions identified by Algorithm 2, the PPV was 97%. The PPV for Algorithm 1 was lower in one center (84%) compared with the other centers (93%-94%), whereas the PPV of Algorithm 2 remained high (96%-98%) across all subgroups. The sensitivity of Algorithms 1 (91%) and 2 (89%) was very good and remained so across subgroups (82%-97%). CONCLUSIONS An ICD-9-CM algorithm requiring a primary diagnosis of CM-I has excellent PPV and very good sensitivity for identifying CM-I decompression surgery in pediatric patients. These results establish a basis for utilizing administrative billing data to assess pediatric CM-I treatment outcomes.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF