Search

Purpose: Blood (EOS-B) and sputum (EOS-S) eosinophil counts may contribute differently to asthma pathogenesis. We compared the impact of the baseline EOS-B and EOS-S levels on lung function, asthma control, and exacerbation in Korean asthma patients. Methods: Asthma patients with baseline EOS-B (n = 4257) and EOS-S (n = 1049) levels from a multicenter cohort (COREA) were included. Pulmonary function test (%FEV1 predicted), asthma control test (ACT), and asthma exacerbation incidence were followed-up every 3 months for one year. Linear mixed-effect models and survival analyses were used to examine the association between eosinophilic groups defined by EOS-B or EOS-S and outcomes. Results: High eosinophilic groups were associated with a low baseline value and a high improvement in the %FEV1 predicted and ACT scores over time. The magnitude of group difference in %FEV1 predicted was twofold higher in the EOS-S versus EOS-B classification [mean and 95% CI: 4.7 (0.6–8.8) versus 2.0 (0.2–3.7) for the baseline value and − 1.5 (− 2.3 to − 0.8) versus − 0.8(− 1.1 to -0.4) for the slope of change], whereas it was identical in ACT score. The magnitude of the impact increased linearly with the elevation of the cut-off level for the EOS-B but remained stable for the EOS-S classification. Patients with an elevation of both their EOS-B and EOS-S showed a higher increment in the %FEV1 predicted and ACT over time. Neither the EOS-B nor EOS-S was associated with asthma exacerbation. Conclusion: EOS-S and EOS-B contribute differently to the clinical outcomes and should be taken into account independently to improve asthma care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Routinely collected data (RCD) from electronic health records (EHR) are useful for studying disease epidemiology in the real world. We examined cough presentation and cough-related healthcare utilization using an academic institutional EHR database in Korea. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with subacute (3–8 weeks) or chronic cough (> 8 weeks in duration) referred to allergy and asthma clinics were studied. Cases were identified using the search term "cough" or "coughing," which is the chief complaint, in the data fields. Structured data, including demographics, medical history, symptoms, and diagnostic tests, were analyzed. Healthcare utilization was assessed for drug prescriptions, additional tests, or outpatient visits for 1 year. Results: Cough was the chief complaint in 13,223 cases (46.7%) among 28,312 new referrals for 8 years. A total of 3810 subacute and 7150 chronic cough patients were analyzed. The common demographic profile was middle-aged woman (mean age 52.1 years), reported in 63% of the cases. Cough was frequently accompanied by anterior nasal (about 50%), lower airway (30%), or acid reflux disease symptoms (20%), and by test abnormalities in chest X-rays (14%), spirometry (23%), or T2 inflammation markers (40%). Chronic cough patients frequently required additional tests (chest CT scan: 24%), drug prescriptions (codeine: 21.5% and oral steroids: 9.9%), and long-term healthcare utilization (16.0%) for 1 year. Conclusions: Cough is a common chief complaint at allergy and asthma clinics, but the clinical presentation may be heterogeneous. Further studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes and reduce the disease burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Targeted therapies have broadened the available treatment options for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). However, differences in the magnitude of treatment responses among patients indicate the presence of various underlying pathophysiological processes and patient subgroups. Objectives: We aimed to describe the characteristics of SEA and identify its patient subgroups. Methods: Clinical data from the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea were analyzed. Cluster analysis was performed among those with SEA using 5 variables, namely, prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s, body mass index, age at symptom onset, smoking amount, and blood eosinophil counts. Results: Patients with SEA showed prevalent sensitization to aeroallergens, decreased lung function, and poor asthma control status. Cluster analysis revealed 3 distinctive subgroups among patients with SEA. Cluster 1 (n = 177) consisted of patients reporting the lowest blood eosinophils (median, 346.8 cells/μL) and modest severe asthma with preserved lung function during the 12-month treatment period. Cluster 2 (n = 42) predominantly included smoking males with severe persistent airway obstruction and moderate eosinophilia (median, 451.8 cells/μL). Lastly, cluster 3 (n = 95) included patients with the most severe asthma, the highest eosinophil levels (median, 817.5 cells/μL), and good treatment response in terms of improved lung function and control status. Conclusions: Three subgroups were identified in SEA through the cluster analysis. The distinctive features of each cluster may help physicians predict patients who will respond to biologics with greater magnitude of clinical improvement. Further research regarding the underlying pathophysiology and clinical importance of each subgroup is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]