Search

Background: This study describes the 20-year experience of managing common arterial trunk (CAT) in a low-and-middle-income country and compares the early and medium-term outcomes following the transition from conduit to nonconduit repair at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital., Methods: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients aged less than 18 years who underwent repair of CAT from January 1999 to December 2018 at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital. Patients with interrupted aortic arch or previous pulmonary artery banding were excluded., Results: Fifty-four patients had CAT repair during the study period. Thirty-four (63.0%) patients had a conduit repair, and 20 (37.0%) patients had a nonconduit repair. There were two intraoperative deaths. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 22.2% (12/54). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 29.6% (16/54). Eight (21.1%) late mortalities were observed. The actuarial survival for the conduit group was 77.5%, 53.4%, and 44.5% at 6, 12, and 27 months, respectively, and the nonconduit group was 58.6% at six months. The overall freedom from reoperation between the conduit group and nonconduit group was 66.2% versus 86.5%, 66.2% versus 76.9%, and 29.8% versus 64.1% at 1, 2, and 8 years, respectively., Conclusions: The outcomes following the transition to nonconduit repair for CAT in a low- and middle-income setting appear to be encouraging. There was no difference in mortality between conduit and nonconduit repairs, and importantly the results suggest a trend toward lower reintervention rates., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.