Search

Twenty-one free-ranging warthogs ( Phacochoerus africanus ) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, were immobilized with a combination of medetomidine (0.07 ± 0.01 mg/kg), butorphanol (0.26 ± 0.04 mg/kg), tiletamine-zolazepam (0.69 ± 0.15 mg/kg), and ketamine (1.43 ± 0.21 mg/kg) administered intramuscularly by dart. Induction, immobilization, and recovery characteristics were evaluated using a standardized scoring system. In the immobilized warthogs, physiological variables were measured every 5 min and arterial blood gases were analyzed at 15-min intervals. At 45 min after initial drug administration, atipamezole (0.34 ± 0.050 mg/kg) and naltrexone (0.53 ± 0.079 mg/kg) were administered intravenously. Overall, induction quality after darting was scored as excellent and the mean time to safe handling was 5.9 ± 2.0 min. Based on muscle relaxation, and loss of palpebral and pedal reflexes, most subjects (17 out of 21) reached a plane of surgical anesthesia by 10 and 15 min; 20 out of 21 warthogs were in this plane for the duration of the monitoring period. In the immobilized warthogs the overall mean heart rate was 65 ± 15.3 beats per minute, mean respiratory rate was 14.7 ± 5.6 breaths per minute, and the mean rectal temperature was 37.9 ± 1.4°C during the 40 min. Arterial blood gas results showed hypoxemia (mean PaO 2 62.1 ± 16.2 mmHg), hypercapnia (mean PaCO 2 47.1 ± 5.1 mmHg), and acidemia (mean pH = 7.36 ± 0.04). Values for PaO 2 and pH improved over the immobilization period. After antagonist administration, overall recovery quality from immobilization was scored as good, with animals standing at a mean time of 7.3 ± 4.9 min. The drug combination proved to be effective in the immobilization of free-ranging warthogs with rapid induction, good anesthesia, and limited cardiorespiratory changes. This anesthetic protocol produces effective, safe, and partially reversible immobilization in warthogs.

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis infection, causes morbidity and mortality in free-ranging lions in bTB-endemic areas of South Africa. However, the only currently used diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST). This test is logistically challenging to perform because it requires immobilization of lions twice in a 72-hr period. Blood-based diagnostic tests, such as serological assays, have been previously reported for M. bovis detection in lion populations, and have the advantage of only requiring a single immobilization. In addition, serological assays can be used for retrospective testing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test free-ranging lions with the STAT-PAKt (Chembio Diagnostics Systems, Medford, NY 11763, USA) and DPPt VetTB (Chembio Diagnostics Systems) serological assays and compare those results with the tuberculin skin test. The serological assays were also used to determine prevalence in bTB-endemic and uninfected lion populations. The results showed that the serological assays could distinguish between M. bovis culture-positive and -negative lions. In addition, antigen-specific humoral responses were present in lions that had clinical signs of bTB disease or were shedding M. bovis antemortem. Although the seroprevalence of M. bovis infection in Kruger National Park lions was similar to that obtained from antemortem mycobacterial culture (4.8 and 3.3%, respectively), it was less than that estimated by the TST (72%). These findings support the hypothesis that assays based on cell-mediated immune responses are more sensitive than serology is in detecting M. bovis infection in lions. However, serological assays can have a role in bTB disease detection in lions and are especially useful for retrospective studies., (© 2019 by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians.)