Search

Curriculum reform was high on the agenda of South Africa's post-apartheid governments. Yet as time passed, the initial reforms were seen as increasingly problematic, especially when pedagogical realities met policy priorities. There was reluctance on the part of policymakers to give up what was seen as the democratic imperative behind the reforms. Yet as schools struggled, public responses blamed inadequate attention to practical issues as undermining the implementation of the reforms. This perspective on curriculum implementation, blaming teachers for the failure of policy reforms, is not uncommon. This paper argues, however, that such a perspective is very often misinformed because it deflects attention from the specific nature of policies and the role of policymaking in neglecting key issues that might have better facilitated implementation. South Africa's democratic curriculum reforms were essential for dismantling a key aspect of the apartheid state. The paper highlights this point arguing that an understanding of policies rather than a focus on the failure of schools provides a better lens for understanding the trajectory of curriculum reform processes in South Africa.

We analyze the sustainable seafood movement as a maturing social-ecological issue. Using a timeline of events over more than a decade and other indicators of growth, we identified key points during its six developmental stages, and evidence of entrance into the final (Normative) phase. After distilling and evaluating the main criticisms and claims attributed to sustainable seafood initiatives globally, we concur that the movement has successfully cultivated a demand for solutions to the challenges of seafood sustainability by creating novel interactions along the value chain – even with the modest investment of our South African example. The global movement is best considered as a dynamic process with interplay at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and asynchronous phases of maturation. We recommend future investment in compliance, governance, credibility, and trust-building as key interventions to reduce risks of problem displacement, in support of a stable Normative phase across the seafood supply chain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As countries commit to developing their ocean-based economies sustainably, it is critical to secure the underlying marine biodiversity and ecological processes. Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) can support achieving this; however, because competition for ocean space is increasing, biodiversity prioritisation must be spatially efficient, conflict-averse, and robust to secure marine biodiversity appropriately. South Africa has a long history and real-world success in spatial planning on land; we aim to draw on this experience to develop an approach by which the biodiversity sector's input to MSP can be developed, in the context of MSP unfolding in South Africa. We used Marxan to develop the first National Coastal and Marine Map of Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and Ecological Support Areas (ESAs). There were 976 biodiversity features and design elements, and the cost layer aimed to avoid conflict with 19 sea-use sectors and avoid more heavily impacted areas. Biodiversity targets were met in 27.0% of the planning domain (5.4% Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), 21.6% CBAs), with 6.6% for ESAs. Sea-use guidelines were developed based on a matrix of activity compatibility with the management objective for CBAs (keep or restore to natural) and ESAs (avoid further degradation), with MPAs managed through their gazetted regulations. The CBA Map and sea-use guidelines formed the basis for the marine biodiversity sector plan for inclusion in MSP. This approach can be broadly applied, even with limited data, as the basis for multi-sector negotiations. We share seven recommendations from our experience to guide planners from other countries. [Display omitted] • A framework for developing the biodiversity sector's input to MSP is conceptualised. • Efficient network of marine biodiversity priorities is identified for South Africa. • Priorities comprise: MPAs; Critical Biodiversity Areas; Ecological Support Areas. • Sea-use guidelines: based on activity compatibility with zone management objectives. • Outputs are the basis for formal multi-sector stakeholder engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an increasingly crowded ocean facing global drivers for economic expansion, many fisheries could benefit from spatial management that enhances traditional fisheries management strategies. In order to reduce risks to ocean health and promote social-ecological resilience, a diversity of spatial management instruments is needed to provide rapid responses and longer-term interventions that promote sustainability and security. To support marine spatial planning (MSP) in South Africa, existing legal instruments were investigated by: (i) describing the prevailing legal framework for spatial fisheries management; (ii) identifying existing legal instruments that are or could be implemented to support spatial fisheries management; (iii) assessing the way in which these instruments could be implemented; and (iv) providing research recommendations to enhance integration of fisheries management measures into MSP. Seven Acts were examined. Within these, nine instruments support fisheries management. Six instruments that could directly contribute to spatial fisheries management were analysed for diversity by comparing them against seven criteria that reflect the complexity and time for implementation, longevity in terms of security and permanence and, transgression consequences. Results show that there is a diversity of instruments available that, if used together in an integrated MSP framework, can provide rapid responses as well as address longer-term goals. Although South Africa does have diversity in the instruments available, two of them, namely fisheries management areas (FMAs) and priority fishing areas (PFAs), have never been implemented, representing missed opportunities. As South Africa begins to implement its new MSP process, we recommend integration of FMAs and PFAs in this process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]