Search

Copyright of Collegium Antropologicum is the property of Croatian Anthropological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Objective: An organized cervical cancer (CC) screening program was introduced in Slovenia in 2003. With the purpose of clinical audit we analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of CC patients for the period between 2003 and 2005. Study design: The retrospectively collected data of 450 CC patients were presented at three Advisory Boards of Gynecologic Oncology in Slovenia. They were stratified for stage, tumor characteristics and treatment methods according to gynecologic examination attendance in the last 5 years preceding the diagnosis of CC (attenders vs. nonattenders). Results: In the period of observation, 242 women (53.8%) visited their gynecologists in the 5-year period prior to diagnosis of CC. Squamous cell carcinoma was present in 378 women (84.0%), adenocarcinoma in 45 (10.0%), adenosquamous carcinoma in 24 (5.3%) and other types in 3 women (0.7%). Attenders were significantly more frequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma than nonattenders (chi-square=5.13; P <0.05). Attenders were significantly more frequently diagnosed in stage IA than in stage IB (chi-square=22.35; P <0.01). Similarly, in attenders stage I was significantly more frequent than stage II (chi-square=18.81; P <0.01). Pathologic smears of women with CC in the last 5-year period were most frequently evaluated as Pap II in the years 2003 and 2004 (in 39.1 and 26.4% of women, respectively) and as Pap III (in 27.9% of women) in 2005. Surgery was performed in 282 women (62.7%), radiotherapy in 158 (35.1%), symptomatic therapy in 9 (2.0%) and chemotherapy alone in 1 (0.2%) woman. In attenders, surgery alone was the most frequent treatment method (chi-square=91.18; P <0.01). Conclusion: Only in attenders a significant redistribution of CC stages in favor of early stages is observed, and in these women more conservative and less extensive treatment methods could be applied. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: The interpretation of postmenopausal smears and the gynecological treatment of these patients can often be difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology as a triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade intraepithelial lesion cytology results in postmenopausal women., Methods: All consecutive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade intraepithelial lesion smears in 1-year period were collected and p16/Ki-67 immunostaining was performed retrospectively. The results were compared with histology results or long-term cytology follow-up in cases with no biopsy., Results: The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN 3 was 57.1% and 85.0%, respectively. The specificity for the detection of CIN 2 was 94.3% and CIN 3 92.4%. Negative predictive values for the detection of CIN 2 and CIN 3 were 96.3% and 99.6%, respectively., Conclusions: Dual p16/Ki-67 immunostaining is a useful additional method in postmenopausal patients with low-grade cytology. Considering the high specificity and negative predictive value in our study, we believe that it could be helpful in avoiding unnecessary referrals to colposcopy and thus reduce the cost of the program.

Background: p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining (DS) has been proven as a sensitive and specific test for triage of HPV positive women with good reproducibility and accuracy. However, implementation of the test into an organized screening program (OSP) is not easy. The aims of this study were to compare the performance and agreement of DS results among three Slovenian cytopathological laboratories involved in the national OSP, and to define cases where staining results can be difficult to interpret., Methods: Cervical smears were obtained for DS from 129 women referred to colposcopy. Smears were evaluated blindly in three laboratories by a cytotechnologist and a cytopathologist after initial training. Results were positive, suspicious, negative or inadequate. Five characteristics of DS staining were recorded. After primary evaluation, an extensive expert-led additional training was undertaken, including a discussion of difficult cases and a practical exam. Smears were re-evaluated and results compared to primary evaluation., Results: After the additional training, the overall percentage of agreement among the three laboratories increased from 77.5 to 89.9% and kappa increased from 0.70 to 0.86. Sensitivity for CIN2+ increased in two laboratories, to 90.5 and 85.7%, without the loss of specificity (75.8%). In one laboratory, the sensitivity slightly decreased from 90.5 to 88.9%, but the specificity increased from 63.6 to 68.2%. Difficult cases had significantly less DS cells, weak intensity of p16 staining, suboptimal cell morphology and background staining compared to positive cases., Conclusion: Additional expert-led training and discussion of difficult cases are necessary for accurate interpretation of DS in laboratories involved in OSP. The most difficult cases were those with single stained cells and weak p16 staining. Training protocol for safe implementation of p16/Ki-67 DS in OSP is proposed.