Search

Introduction: Given the importance placed on awareness and participation in research by Speciality and Training organisations, we sought to survey Scottish trainee attitudes to exposure to research practice during training and research in or out of programme., Methods: An online survey was distributed to core and specialist trainees in general surgery in Scotland., Results: Over a 4-month period, 108 trainees (75 ST/SPRs and 33 CTs) completed the survey. In their current post, most were aware of ongoing research projects (77%) and 55% were aware of trial recruitment. Only 47% attend regular journal clubs. Most believe that they are expected to present (89%) and publish (82%) during training. Most (59%) thought that participation in research is well supported. 57% were advised to undertake time out of programme research, mostly by consultants (48%) and training committee (36%). Of the 57 with time out of programme research experience, most did so in early training (37%) or between ST3-5 (47%). 28 out of the 36 (78%) without a national training number secured one after starting research. Most undertook research in a local academic unit (80%) funded by small grants (47%) or internally (33%). Most research (69%) was clinically orientated (13/55 clinical, 25/55 translational). 56% of those completing time out of programme research obtained an MD or PhD. About 91% thought that research was relevant to a surgical career., Conclusions: Most trainees believe that research is an important part of training. Generally, most trainees are exposed to research practices including trial recruitment. However, <50% attend regular journal clubs, a pertinent point, given the current 'exit exam' includes the assessment of critical appraisal skills.

Significant numbers of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) also report symptoms of sexual dysfunction (SD). The prevalence of SD in patients referred to a prostate assessment clinic, was assessed using a confidential questionnaire. Fifty-six percent of patients reported difficulties in maintaining an erection and 48% felt that improving their sexual function would benefit their quality of life. None of the referral letters from primary care mentioned symptoms of SD. Patients with LUTS seen in primary and secondary care should be assessed for SD and offered appropriate advice and management.

Background: The recent liberalisation of public access to information, including surgical performance, emphasises the necessity for accurate data collection. The Information and Statistics Division of the Scottish Executive (ISD) collect such data for each patient episode, but there is concern about the reliability of this information compared with that collected in local surgical departmental audit., Aim: To determine if diagnostic and operative details were consistent between local audited and national non-audited data sets., Methods: Three surgical units comprising eight consultants were studied. Epidemiological, diagnostic and operative data for each consultant were accessed from the eScrips Internet resource (ISD Data) and from the departmental database. A unique patient number and date of birth matched individual patient episodes and the correlation between datasets graded for accuracy and consistency., Results: 8375 individual data entries were recorded (ISD 4642, local databases 3733). 3402 pairs, 6408 (76.5%) of the total, matched accurately. 742 (16%) of the ISD entries were duplicates, and in 21% of unpaired entries the wrong consultant was recorded. Overall a clinically acceptable match occurred in 86.9% of paired entries for diagnosis and 84.0% for operation. The highest match with ISD data for diagnosis (88.8%) and operation (91.8%) occurred in the unit which holds a weekly audit meeting to validate information., Discussion: There are significant discrepancies in surgical data between the local audit databases and central data. There is significant duplication of entries and inaccurate consultant allocation in ISD data. The promulgation of inaccurate information could threaten reputation or career and clinicians should play a more active role in ensuring clinical data are correct.