Search

Background: Stomach pain and discomfort have been reported since antiquity., Aim: To follow the time trends since the 18th century of dyspepsia, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and benign oesophageal disease to test when dyspepsia started to become a major clinical problem., Methods: The annual in- and out-patient records of the last three centuries from the Scottish Royal Infirmaries of Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Glasgow and Dundee were analysed. In addition, dispensary attendances, clinicians' casebooks, students' notebooks and medical texts have been scrutinized for historic statistics of upper gastrointestinal disease., Results: Dyspepsia was first recorded in the 1750s and increased markedly subsequently. Such dyspepsia persisted after gastric and duodenal ulcers appeared in the late 19th century and then declined again in the late 20th century. Non-ulcer dyspepsia has remained the commonest diagnosis made after endoscopy for stomach pain in the beginning of the 21st century., Conclusion: The current commonest diagnosis of stomach pain, dyspepsia dates from the mid-18th century. Any explanations of its causation need to consider this timing.

Objectives: To determine the incidence and case fatality of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the west of Scotland and to identify associated factors., Design: Case ascertainment study., Setting: All hospitals treating adults with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the west of Scotland., Subjects: 1882 patients aged 15 years and over treated in hospitals for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage during a six month period., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage per 100,000 population per year, and case fatality., Results: The annual incidence was 172 per 100,000 people aged 15 and over. The annual population mortality was 14.0 per 100,000. Both were higher among elderly people, men, and patients resident in areas of greater social deprivation. Overall case fatality was 8.2%. This was higher among those who bled as inpatients after admission for other reasons (42%) and those admitted as tertiary referrals (16%). Factors associated with increased case fatality were age, uraemia, pre-existing malignancy, hepatic failure, hypotension, cardiac failure, and frank haematemesis or a history of syncope at presentation. Social deprivation, sex, and anaemia were not associated with increased case fatality after adjustment for other factors., Conclusions: The incidence of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage was 67% greater than the highest previously reported incidence in the United Kingdom, which may be partially attributable to the greater social deprivation in the west of Scotland and may be related to the increased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori. Fatality after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage was associated with age, comorbidity, hypotension, and raised blood urea concentrations on admission. Although deprivation was associated with increased incidence, it was not related to the risk of fatality.

Introduction: Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR1) data are coded by trained clerical staff from case records and discharge summaries. They form the basis of many strategic NHS decisions. Their accuracy for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) diagnosis is unknown and the study was undertaken to assess this accuracy in Tayside., Method: Patients who fulfilled the following criteria were identified using a record-linkage pharmacoepidemiological database, and their case records retrieved: over 50 years of age, had encashed at least one prescription for a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at a Tayside pharmacy and who had SMR1 records containing one or more symptom/diagnosis codes between January 1989 and December 1991. Medically qualified staff were trained to examine case records and to code UGI diagnoses. They searched the case records for every UGI SMR1 entry for these patients from 1980-1992 and produced re-coded diagnoses (RCD) for each hospital event (admission and discharge), using all the data available in the case records. They also abstracted data on the clinical presentation, investigations and management of patients. Each event was then examined by a single medically qualified researcher who compared the original SMR1 codes with the RCDs., Results: 2,101 patients had a total of 3,764 events in 1989-1991. 317 events were either day case procedures or elective surgery or the case records were not found. They were therefore excluded. Of the remainder, the SMR1 and RCD codes were judged equivalent in 1,608 events (46.6%). However, 1,005 SMR1 events (29.2%) contained a symptom code but no diagnosis code and the remaining 834 (24.2%) were judged suboptimal for other reasons. Of those with a symptom code only, 406 could not be improved upon and were transformed into RCD symptom codes only, 435 were assigned symptom and diagnostic RCDs and 164 were assigned diagnostic RCDs only. In the other 834 events, 279 had one or more diagnoses missing, 425 had one or more diagnoses inaccurate, 23 had both missing and inaccurate diagnoses and 107 were not UGI. Thus 1,433 (41.6%) of UGI SMR1 events could be more accurately coded. Examination of investigation data revealed that coding inaccuracy was not due to diagnostic procedures being carried out after admission., Conclusion: UGI SMR1 data were satisfactory in about half of all events. In about a quarter there were symptom codes but no satisfactory diagnosis codes, whilst in another quarter the data were inaccurate. These findings have implications for health care activities and research that use these data.