Search

This article presents the views of the author on a paper by Roscoe R. Braham, Jr. which focused on involvement of statisticians in weather modification work. As Professor Braham states, the replication of the Climax I experimental results in the Climax II experiment did strengthen both the statistical evidence and the compatibility with meteorological physical reasoning. For the past several years, meteorologists at Colorado State University have advocated planned research to study possible extended-area effects from intentional weather modification. Very recently, in connection with design studies for a possible experiment of this type in the central and northern Colorado mountains, station-by-station precipitation analyses of the Climax I and II experimental units were made for all available hourly stations in Colorado. Even though the wintertime mountain precipitation process may be simple compared to summertime precipitation such as rainfall from thunderstorms, it is still extremely complex. Further, it is controlled by so many scales of influences that highly heterogeneous samples may be difficult to avoid, even in carefully planned randomized experiments which use partitioning on many but not all of the influences.