Search

The article presents the author's views on U.S. conservatives' criticism on San Francisco, California's proposed ban on male circumcision. He provides a brief history of circumcision in the country which started as a way to prevent or treat masturbation that was believed to be a sinful act. He discusses several reasons why uncircumcised penises are not dirty and unhealthy contrary to popular myth. He offers several arguments to convince Conservatives to support San Francisco's proposal.

The article reports on the numerous products and activities which have been banned by the city of San Francisco, California. These include declawing cats, selling cell phones without posted levels of radiation emission, and plastic shopping bags. Proposed bans on the circumcision of minors and the distribution of yellow pages telephone books are also noted.

The article reports that voters in San Francisco, California will vote on a ballot measure that would outlaw circumcision on boys under the age of 18. It mentions that the issue has caused much concerns for Jews in the area since they see it as a violation of the Constitution's protection of religious rights. It states that circumcision is a fundamental aspect of the Jewish custom and identity.

The article reports on the proposal of human rights activist Lloyd Schofield and like-minded advocates who call themselves as intactivists to ban all male circumcisions in San Francisco, California. The proposal indicates that those who violate the ban could be fined not more than 1,000 dollars or could be jailed for not more than one year. It notes that Schofield and advocates seek to make it unlawful to circumcise or mutilate the whole or any part of the child's foreskin, penis, or testicles.

The article reports on the latest ban being proposed in San Francisco, California which is male circumcision wherein it would be a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.

The article reports that San Francisco, California, will vote on the legality of performing male circumcision in November 2011, noting how Jewish and Muslim groups are opposing the proposal.

The article reports that gay man Lloyd Schofield successfully secured a measure proposing to criminalize male circumcision on the ballot for the November 2011 municipal election in San Francisco, California.

The article focuses on the new law passed in California in response to a proposed referendum in San Francisco to prohibit the genital clipping. It reports that the under the new law, Californians will have the right to choose whether to circumcise their sons. It informs that Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi shut down the referendum in July 2011, on justification that it violated a California law that makes regulating medical procedures a function of the state, not cities.

The article focuses on the new law passed in San Francisco, California in response to a proposed referendum that would prohibit genital clipping, wherein, the Californians will retain their rights to circumcise their sons under the law. It states that the ballot measure sponsored by anti-circumcision activist Lloyd Schofield has been struck down by Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi in July 2011. The court held that the refrendum violated a California law governing medical procedures.