Search

The UK government is cautioning the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) about overstepping its role as it prepares to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda. Minister for Europe Nusrat Ghani will emphasize the importance of the ECHR adhering to its promise to only issue injunctions against deportations in exceptional circumstances and if there is a risk of irreparable harm. The UK's plan to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda has faced controversy, but the government argues that it is consistent with international commitments and has resulted in a decline in migrants arriving in small boats across the English Channel. [Extracted from the article]

The UK government has begun detaining asylum seekers with the intention of deporting them to Rwanda, as part of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's migration policy. The first deportation flights are expected to take place in the next nine to eleven weeks. This policy has become a divisive issue in British politics, with the Conservatives arguing that it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the English Channel, while the Labour Party believes it is unworkable. The UK government has declared Rwanda a "safe" destination for deportees, despite a Supreme Court ruling stating otherwise. The Home Office has not disclosed the number of migrants detained, but data shows that crossings have increased to a record high in 2024. Additionally, there are concerns about the ability to locate and detain all the migrants that Rwanda has agreed to accept. There is also a dispute between the UK and Ireland regarding migration across the border from Northern Ireland, with the UK seeking clarification on the issue. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has successfully passed legislation declaring Rwanda a safe destination for asylum-seekers, despite facing opposition within his own Conservative Party. The legislation, which aims to stop migrants from reaching the UK by boat, has been seen as a potential game-changer for Sunak's government. However, it has drawn criticism from opposition parties, human rights groups, and some members of the Conservative Party. The first deportation flights to Rwanda are expected to take place in 10 to 12 weeks, but there are doubts about the effectiveness of the plan and concerns about legal challenges. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has successfully passed legislation declaring Rwanda a safe destination for asylum-seekers, despite facing opposition within his own Conservative Party. The legislation, which aims to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel, includes exemptions for those who have supported the British military abroad. Sunak sees this policy as a potential game-changer for his government, which has historically low poll numbers. However, the passing of the bill has drawn criticism from opposition parties, human rights groups, and some members of Sunak's own party, who argue that it undermines international legal protections and is an expensive solution for a small number of refugees. The first deportation flights to Rwanda are expected to take place in 10 to 12 weeks. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has successfully passed legislation declaring Rwanda a safe destination for asylum-seekers, despite facing opposition within his own Conservative Party. The passage of this legislation is seen as a significant victory for Sunak, who hopes it will help improve the ruling party's historically low poll numbers. The government plans to begin deportation flights to Rwanda in the next few months, with the aim of deterring migrants from crossing the English Channel. However, there are concerns about the effectiveness of this strategy and whether Rwanda has the capacity to process a large number of migrants. [Extracted from the article]

The UK government, led by Rishi Sunak, is set to begin deportation flights to Rwanda by July after a law declaring Rwanda a "safe" destination for asylum seekers passed its final hurdle in Parliament. The law was introduced to bypass a Supreme Court ruling that blocked deportations on human rights grounds. The first flights will take place in 10 to 12 weeks, according to Sunak. The government sees this policy as a potential game-changer, aimed at showing that they are delivering on their promise to "stop the boats" bringing migrants across the English Channel. However, there are concerns about the effectiveness of the deportations as a deterrent and whether Rwanda has the capacity to process a large number of migrants. [Extracted from the article]

UK lawmakers have rejected amendments proposed by the House of Lords to a plan that would deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's administration argued that the amendments would weaken the migration bill. The legislation will now return to the Lords for further consideration. Sunak's government aims to begin deportation flights to Rwanda by spring, but progress may be delayed if the Lords resist pressure. This vote is seen as an important step for Sunak, who is facing poor poll numbers and potential defeat in an upcoming election. The rejected amendments included provisions related to determining Rwanda's safety and preventing the deportation of wrongly assessed unaccompanied children. If the Lords ultimately back down, the bill could become law this week. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's attempt to prevent further court challenges to his migrant deportation policy has raised constitutional concerns in the UK. The government's legislation aims to declare Rwanda a safe country for migrants and remove grounds for asylum-seekers to legally fight their deportation. Some constitutional lawyers argue that this bill could undermine the relationship between Parliament and the courts, asserting supremacy over the judiciary and potentially violating centuries of English Common Law. The bill faces opposition from both anti-immigration right-wing members of the Conservative Party and Tory moderates who support the rule of law. The clash between factions mirrors the conflicts seen during the Brexit negotiations, and the bill's passage could lead to legal challenges if it becomes law. [Extracted from the article]

Rishi Sunak, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, expressed frustration over the delay in implementing the country's Rwanda deportation plan. The plan, seen as crucial for the Conservative Party's electoral prospects, was recently blocked by the UK Supreme Court. Sunak is facing pressure from within his party to push through the plan, but he is aware that disregarding human rights laws could harm international relations and the Northern Ireland peace deal. The government is currently working on new legislation to address the concerns raised by the court while allowing the deportation flights to proceed. [Extracted from the article]

Rishi Sunak, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, expressed frustration over the delay in implementing the government's Rwanda deportation plan. The plan, seen as crucial for the Conservative Party's electoral prospects, was recently blocked by the UK Supreme Court. Sunak is facing pressure from within his party to push through the plan, but he is aware that disregarding human rights laws could harm international relations and the Northern Ireland peace deal. The government is currently working on new legislation to address the concerns raised by the court while allowing the deportation flights to proceed. [Extracted from the article]

The European Union has privately expressed concerns to the UK about its commitment to international human rights agreements, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Refugee Convention. These agreements have hindered the UK's efforts to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda but also support other important deals, like the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland. UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak is facing pressure from some members of the Conservative Party to disapply these obligations, but this could have significant consequences for international relations and agreements. Sunak's team is working on a new treaty with Rwanda and emergency legislation, but no final decisions have been made. [Extracted from the article]

The UK government, led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, is facing pressure from members of his Conservative Party to publish a new treaty with Rwanda and begin deporting asylum seekers to the country. This comes after a ruling by the Supreme Court deemed the deportation of asylum seekers to Rwanda unlawful. Sunak's government plans to publish the treaty and introduce legislation to address this issue, but there are concerns about the parliamentary process and potential legal challenges. The government's approach is already facing backlash, with critics questioning the role of courts and Parliament in declaring Rwanda a safe country. [Extracted from the article]

Rishi Sunak, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, is facing a challenge to his plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. The Supreme Court ruled the plan illegal due to concerns about the safety of asylum seekers. Sunak is now proposing a new treaty with Rwanda and legislation to declare it a "safe" country, but it is uncertain whether this will satisfy the courts. Some right-wing Tories support Sunak's plan, while others believe it is insufficient. Sunak's leadership is also being questioned, with some Tory MPs submitting letters of no-confidence. The issue of immigration is a contentious one, with some MPs arguing it is a matter of sovereignty and Brexit. Sunak's approach risks alienating both the right and the more moderate MPs. The Bar Council and former Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption have raised concerns about legislating around a Supreme Court ruling. Sunak's firing of Home Secretary Suella Braverman has further fueled criticism. The pressure on Sunak is heightened by the upcoming general election, with the Tories trailing in the polls. [Extracted from the article]

Rishi Sunak, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, is facing a challenge to his plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. The Supreme Court recently ruled the plan illegal, citing concerns about the safety of asylum seekers. Sunak is now proposing a new treaty with Rwanda and legislation to declare it a "safe" country, but it is unclear if this will satisfy the courts. Some right-wing Tories support Sunak's plan, while others believe it is insufficient and predict further legal challenges. Sunak's leadership is also being questioned, with some Tory MPs submitting letters of no-confidence. The issue of immigration is seen as a wedge issue for the Conservative Party, but Sunak's response risks alienating both the right and the more moderate MPs. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is facing backlash from his own Conservative Party after the Supreme Court ruled his plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda as illegal. Sunak remains committed to stopping migrants from arriving in small boats across the English Channel and is working on a new treaty with Rwanda to address the court's concerns. However, legal experts believe it will be difficult for the government to persuade the courts, and time is running out for Sunak to show progress before the upcoming general election. Some Tory MPs are calling for new domestic human rights legislation to override international obligations, while others argue that leaving the European Convention on Human Rights would be a confidence issue in Sunak's leadership. [Extracted from the article]

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is facing backlash from his own Conservative Party after the Supreme Court ruled his plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda as illegal. Sunak remains committed to stopping migrants from arriving in small boats across the English Channel and is considering changing British laws to make the deportation plan happen. However, it is uncertain whether a new treaty with Rwanda will satisfy the courts or appease right-wing Tory politicians. The court's decision plays into the febrile Tory mood, and some MPs are calling for more extreme measures, such as ignoring the law and pushing through new domestic human rights legislation. [Extracted from the article]

The UK's highest court has ruled that Rishi Sunak's plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful, dealing a blow to the government's efforts to curb cross-channel arrivals. The court found that there was a real risk that asylum seekers processed by Rwanda could be sent back to their home countries. The decision is seen as a political setback for Sunak, who had made stopping the arrival of asylum seekers a key promise. The government may now consider sending asylum seekers to other countries such as Turkey, Egypt, or Iraq. [Extracted from the article]

The UK's highest court has ruled that Rishi Sunak's plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful, dealing a blow to the government's efforts to curb cross-channel arrivals. The court found that there was a real risk that asylum seekers processed by Rwanda could be sent back to their home countries. This decision is a setback for Sunak, who had made stopping the boats a key promise to voters. The government may now consider sending asylum seekers to other countries instead. [Extracted from the article]