Search

Aim: The aim of this study has been to measure the distress of workers at a large hospital in Rome, immediately after the lockdown with relaxed national restrictions except the indication to wear masks FP2 and to maintain the interpersonal distance of at least one meter., Method: A web-based anonymous survey has been conducted. Of the 324 responders (23-69 years; 78.09% females), 41.05% was nurse, 31.17% medical doctor, 7.72% employee with administrative function, 3.09% psychologist, 1.54% biologist, 13.58% grouped in the "other" category. 60.49% worked in a no-covid-19 ward, 20.37% in the covid-19 ward, 13.58% in outpatient clinics, and 5.56% outside the hospital. 45.06% have been exposed to covid-19 and 7.72% tested positive for covid-19. 66.67% were satisfied with the safety measures taken by the hospital. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, as measured by IES-R, and peritraumatic distress, measured by CPDI, were frequently reported (41.05% and 43.21%, respectively). PTSD resulted independently associated with peritraumatic distress (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR 49.83), perception of being avoided by family and/or friends due to work performed (AOR= 4.05), low hope for the future (AOR= 2.25) and female gender (AOR= 2.90). Age and profession were considered confounding variables., Results: These results showed that even in times of reduced restrictions, the prevalence of peritraumatic distress and PTSD is high, regardless of work and professional specialization, length of service, more or less direct contact with covid-19 patients., Conclusions: Since the biological damage resulting from a PTSD is known, it is important to activate screening programs followed by specific interventions to reduce long-term risks to mental health.

The purpose of this study is to verify the usefulness of a multidisciplinary Trauma Registry in the evaluation of trauma, particularly in relation to the number of specialists involved, and to analyze the effective role of the general trauma surgeon in an integrated trauma care system. The present study was performed by analyzing data from the Trauma Registry of the University Hospital Sant'Andrea in Rome, which was set up in March 2006. Data recorded between March 2006 and March 2009 was considered for the present study. The severity of trauma was categorized by dividing patients into 4 subgroups based on the value of ISS: minor injuries (ISS 1-8), moderate (ISS 9-15), severe (ISS 16-24) and very severe (ISS> 24). Patients who had an ISS greater than 9 were taken into account for further analysis and comparison. To evaluate the significance of the multidisciplinarity the patients were stratified in subgroups considering the number of specialists involved in relation to the anatomic location of injuries. In the 1386 trauma patients entered in the registry, the mean and median ISS value were 10.7 ± 8.4 and 9 respectively. The overall mortality and morbidity were 4.1% and 7.4% respectively. There was a statistically significant linear relationship between the number of specialists involved and the ISS (multidisciplinarity / ISS r = 0.493, p <0.001). Patients with ISS greater than 9 were 358, 25.8% of all cases. The mean ISS was 21.4 ± 10.3. Mortality and morbidity rates were 9.8% (35 patients) and 22.1% (79 patients) respectively. The average number of specialists involved was 2.4 ± 1.1, median 2 (range 1- 6). Results confirmed the significance of the multidisciplinary treatment for patients with trauma and the central role played by the general surgeon.

The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic significance of thoracic and abdominal trauma in severely injured patients. A retrospective analysis was performed based on data from the period from March 1 2006 to December 31 2007, taken from the Trauma Registry of the University Hospital "SantAndrea" in Rome. A total of 844 trauma patients were entered in a database created for this purpose, and only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, (163 patients, 19.3%), were selected for the present study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (103 patients, 63.2%), consisting of patients with at least one thoracic injury, and Group B (46 patients, 28.2%) consisting of patients with concomitant thoracic and abdominal injuries. The impact of thoracic and abdominal trauma was studied by analyzing mortality and morbidity, in relation to patient age, cause and dynamics of trauma, length of hospital stay, and both ISS and New ISS (NISS). In a vast majority of cases, the cause of trauma was a road accident (126 patients, 77.3%). The mean age of patients with ISS > 15 was 45.2 +/- 19.3 years. The mean ISS and NISS were 25.7 +/- 10.5 and of 31.4 +/- 13.1 respectively. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 18.4% (30 patients) and 28.8% (47 patients) respectively. In Group A the mortality rate was 23.3% (24 patients) and the morbidity rate was 33.9% (35 patients). In Group B mortality and morbidity rates were 369% (17 patients) and 43.5% (20 patients) respectively. It was shown that the presence of both thoracic and abdominal injuries significantly increases the risk of mortality and morbidity. In patients with predominantly thoracic injuries, NISS proved to be the more reliable score, while ISS appeared to be more accurate in evaluating patients with injuries affecting more than one region of the body.