Search

Simple Summary: Invasive species are common on islands and, increasingly so, in urban ecosystems. They can pose serious ecological and socioeconomic impacts, making research on how invasions are promoted critically important. We examined different traits of guttural toads (Sclerophrys gutturalis) in their natural and invasive ranges (both natural and urban populations in native and invasive sites) to understand if divergences in habitats in their native range could increase their invasive potential. We found that invasive island populations on Mauritius and Réunion (Indian Ocean) have reduced body sizes, proportionally shorter limbs, slower escape speeds, and reduced endurance capacities compared to the native South African populations. In short, these changes occurred post-invasion. However, increase climbing ability was seen within the urban-native toads, a trait maintained within the two invasions, suggesting that it may have been an advantageous prior adaptation. Becoming climbers may have benefited the toad during colonization, increasing navigation and hunting ability within the urbanized areas where they were introduced, prior to their spread into natural areas. This change in climbing performance is an example of how the urbanization of native taxa may be increasing the ability of certain species to become better invaders should they be introduced outside their native range. A prominent feature of the modern era is the increasing spread of invasive species, particularly within island and urban ecosystems, and these occurrences provide valuable natural experiments by which evolutionary and invasion hypotheses can be tested. In this study, we used the invasion route of guttural toads (Sclerophrys gutturalis) from natural-native and urban-native populations (Durban, South Africa) to their urban-invasive and natural-invasive populations (Mauritius and Réunion) to determine whether phenotypic changes that arose once the toads became urbanized in their native range have increased their invasive potential before they were transported (i.e., prior adaptation) or whether the observed changes are unique to the invasive populations. This urban/natural by native/invasive gradient allowed us to examine differences in guttural toad morphology (i.e., body size, hindlimb, and hindfoot length) and performance capacity (i.e., escape speed, endurance, and climbing ability) along their invasion route. Our findings indicate that invasive island populations have reduced body sizes, shorter limbs in relation to snout-vent length, decreased escape speeds, and decreased endurance capacities that are distinct from the native mainland populations (i.e., invasion-derived change). Thus, these characteristics did not likely arise directly from a pre-transport anthropogenic "filter" (i.e., urban-derived change). Climbing ability, however, did appear to originate within the urban-native range and was maintained within the invasive populations, thereby suggesting it may have been a prior adaptation that provided this species with an advantage during its establishment in urban areas and spread into natural forests. We discuss how this shift in climbing performance may be ecologically related to the success of urban and invasive guttural toad populations, as well as how it may have impacted other island-derived morphological and performance phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many biological invasions occur within and between urban areas. If native species adapted to anthropogenically altered habitats are subsequently moved from an urban area in their native range to one within a novel region, then their urban-specialized phenotypes may provide them an advantage via prior adaptation. Here we examine if urban-derived behavioral traits are present within native guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis, populations (Durban, South Africa) and investigate whether these localized phenotypes persisted within their invasive populations in Mauritius and Réunion. In our study, we measured boldness and exploration in populations along the toad's invasion route and found that toads were significantly bolder in urban populations, within both native and invasive ranges. This suggests boldness increased when toads transitioned to urban living in their native range and these heightened levels of boldness were maintained within invaded urban areas. This provides evidence that a bolder phenotype was a prior adaptation that likely increased guttural toad's invasion success. Interestingly, toad boldness returned to pre-urbanization levels within invasive populations that spread into natural areas, replicated on both islands. Exploration, on the other hand, was not increased above pre-urbanization, or pre-invasion, levels for any of the populations, and was lower in toads from Mauritius. Overall, our findings suggest that increased boldness is favored in urban habitats and that urban-derived behavioral traits may provide individuals an advantage when invading new urban landscapes. Significance statement: Species adapting to anthropogenic landscapes have the ability to increase their invasive potential if the altered phenotypes they accrue can provide them advantages once they are transported outside their native range. Our study examined differences in behavioral traits, boldness, and exploration, along the invasion route of guttural toads, Sclerophrys gutturalis, between natural and urban sites from their native origin populations around Durban, South Africa, to their invasive populations in Mauritius and Réunion. We determined that populations were bolder in urban areas in their native range and that this increased boldness persisted in the other anthropogenic habitats within their invasive ranges, but reverted back to natural-native levels within populations that had spread into natural areas on both islands. Our findings support the growing trend that anthropogenically altered landscapes favor bolder individuals, as well as the assertion that urban-derived traits may bolster a species' ability to establish and spread within novel landscapes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Altered environments in urban areas are known to impact and change animal behaviour. In particular, artificial light at night (ALAN) affects behaviour across taxonomic groups, including reptiles. Geckos in the genus Phelsuma are predominantly diurnal, but some have been documented to alter their foraging behaviour from a diurnal to nocturnal activity period when they have access to artificial light sources. Herein, we report new observations of six Phelsuma spp. (Andaman day geckos, P. andamanensis; blue‐tailed day geckos, P. cepediana; Madagascar giant day geckos, P. grandis; Réunion ornate day geckos, P. inexpectata; gold dust day geckos, P. laticauda; Mahé day geckos, P. sundbergi longinsulae) using artificial lights to engage in nocturnal activity that includes foraging, courtship, and agonistic behaviour. Artificial light at night augments the amount of time predators, especially visual predators, can spend foraging. This can increase their overall daily activity period (i.e. the amount of time spent active within 24 h), and research is yet to fully understand the cost–benefit trade‐offs this altered behaviour has on individual fitness. Overall, our novel accounts of six Phelsuma spp. contribute to knowledge regarding the diversity of animals that have altered their behaviour in response to ALAN and highlight the behavioural flexibility of this group of geckos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]