Search

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2-3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All authors report that the KGOG paid for their 2-night hotel stay and basic meals during the 2 days of the ECCC on Clinical Research meeting. CLC reports a research grant paid to her institution from Varian; payment to her institution for participation on a data safety monitoring board from Merck; and unpaid roles as chair of GCIG Endometrial Committee and member of Guidelines Committees for Endometrial cancer of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology. GE reports personal consulting fees from MSD, personal fees from Eisai, and support for attending a meeting or travel from MSD. LE reports personal consulting fees AstraZeneca, GSK, and MSD; personal fees from AstraZeneca and GSK, and support for attending a meeting or travel from AstraZeneca and GSK. RAN reports research grants paid to his institution from Elekta, Varian, and Accuray; and payment to his institution for presentations from Elekta and MSD. DL reports research grants both personal and paid to her institution from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Novartis, Pharmamar, and Seagen; personal grants from Corcept, Oncoinvest, and Sutro; and grants to her institution from Incyte and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Novartis, Oncoinvest, Pharmamar, Seagen, and Sutro; payment for presentations from Clovis Oncology, Corcept, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Novartis, Oncoinvest, Pharmamar, Seagen, and Sutro; support for attending a meeting or travel from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, MSD and GSK; and payments for participation on a data safety monitoring board from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Novartis, Oncoinvest, Pharmamar, Seagen, and Sutro. AO reports research grants paid to his institution from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, uncompensated participation on data and safety monitoring boards of studies funded by AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; and unpaid roles as principal investigator on investigator-initiated trials and on steering committees of trials funded by AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. BP reports research grants from Tesaro/GSK, Merck, AstraZeneca, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sutro, Incyte, Clovis Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Mersana, Celsion/Immunon, Imab, Takeda, Toray, VBL Therapeutics, InxMed, Agenus, Seagen, NRG Oncology, Duality Bio, Xencor, Onconova, Celgene, Sutro Biopharma, Novocure, Immunogen, Eisai, Acrivon, and Alkermes; consulting fees from Tesaro/GSK, AstraZeneca, Merck, Immunogen, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Foundation, SeaGen, Lily, Eisai, Signatera, Celsion, Butro Biopharma, Imvax, Incyte, InxMed, Onconova Therapeutics, R Pharm, Regeneron, and Duality Bio; payment for presentations from Bioascend, PERS, Vanium, Curio, OncLive, Yale University and PeerView; support for attending a meeting or travel from GOG Partners, payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Sutro, AstraZeneca, GOG Foundation, Celsion/Immunon, Toray, InxMed, Imvax, Imab, Tesaro/GSK, Merck, Mersana, Nuvation, and BioNtech; and unpaid leadership roles in boards, societies and committees: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee Chair, SGO Board of Directors, SGO COVID-19 Taskforce co-chair, GOG Partners, and New York Obstetrical Society Second VP. BH reports textbook royalties from Elsevier; consulting fees from Tempus; honoraria for lectures from Leica and Projects in Knowledge; and unpaid leadership roles on the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Board of Directors (as member at large) and on the Endometrial Cancer MSI Committee of the College of American Pathologists. IR-C reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK, Mersana, BMS, and MSD; payment for presentations from AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK, Mersana, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pharmamar, Seagen, Eisai, and Novartis; support for attending a meeting or travel from Roche, GSK, AstraZeneca, Pharmamar, and MSD; and payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Clovis, Deciphera, Adaptimmue, Sutro, and Immunogen. DG reports support for attending meetings or travel from IGCS Board of Directors; payment for participation on a data and safety monitoring board from Merck, and a leadership role in NRG Oncology. AM reports payment for participation as independent statistician on data safety monitoring boards from ONY Biotech, Regeneron, and Genentech/Roche. NC reports payments or honoraria for presentations from GSK, Seagen, Akesobio, AstraZeneca, eTheRNA immunotherapies NV, Kartos, MSD, Mersana, ImmunoGen, Eisai, Seattle Genetics, TouchIME, and Medscape Oncology; support for attending a meeting or travel from Roche, Genmab, and Amgen; payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from GSK, Mersana, Seagen, ImmunoGen, Akesobio, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, eTheRNA immunotherapies NV, and Kartos; and leadership roles as President of ESGO and Chair of European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups Early Drug Development Network. MAP reports grants paid to his institution from GSK; payment for participation on a data and safety monitoring board from GSK, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck, Immunogen, Clovis Oncology, Jazz Pharma, and SeaGen; and payment to his institution for a leadership role on a board or committee from NRG Oncology. MAB reports payment to his institution for participation on a data and safety monitoring board from Immunogen; and employment as physician at The Permanente Medical Group. J-WK, EA, SIK, J-YP, LM, PBO, AB, DM, VG, TB, CG, TM, HW, XM-G, WS, and GS declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: To investigate the impact of conization on survival outcomes and to identify a specific population that might benefit from conization before radical hysterectomy (RH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer., Methods: From six institutions in Korea, we identified node-negative, margin-negative, parametria-negative, 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2006 and 2021. The patients were divided into multiple groups based on tumor size, surgical approach, and histology. We performed a series of independent 1:1 propensity score matching and compared the survival outcomes between the conization and non-conization groups., Results: In total, 1254 patients were included: conization (n = 355) and non-conization (n = 899). Among the matched patients with a tumor size of >2 cm, the conization group showed a significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate compared with the non-conization group when RH was conducted via minimally invasive surgery (MIS), in those with squamous cell carcinoma (96.3% vs. 87.4%, P = 0.007) and non-squamous cell carcinoma (97.0% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.021). However, no difference in DFS was observed between the two groups among the matched patients with a tumor size of ≤2 cm, regardless of surgical approach or histological type. In patients who underwent MIS RH, DFS significantly worsened as the residual tumor size increased (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Cervical conization was associated with a lower recurrence rate in patients with early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size of >2 cm who underwent primary MIS RH. Cervical conization may be performed prior to MIS RH to minimize the uterine residual tumor., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To investigate the incidence and survival rates of primary uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) in Korea., Methods: From the Korea Central Cancer Registry, we identified patients diagnosed with primary UCS between 1999 and 2018 and collected their information, including age at diagnosis, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage, and treatment. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated. Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared by study periods, ages, and stages at initial diagnosis., Results: Overall, the incidence rate of primary UCS increased markedly during the time period: ASRs, 0.02 per 100,000 in 1999 and 0.25 per 100,000 in 2018 (APC, 13.9%; p<0.001). No difference in OS was observed between patients diagnosed in 1999-2008 and those diagnosed in 2009-2018 (5-year survival rate, 46.0% vs. 48.6%; p=0.871). Considering the mean patient age at diagnosis of UCS, we divided the study population into 2 groups. Patients aged ≥60 years had a more frequent prior radiation history, received less multi-modality treatment, and showed worse OS than those aged <60 years (5-year survival rate, 42.7% vs. 53.6%; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, both old age at diagnosis (≥60 years) and the SEER summary stage were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS, whereas radiation history before the diagnosis of UCS was not., Conclusion: The incidence rate of UCS in Korea increased significantly from 1999 to 2018. Advanced stage and old age (≥60 years) at diagnosis might be poor prognostic factors for survival, but not prior radiation history., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2023. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: Given the expanding clinical use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), there is a significant need for optimal strategies with which to treat patients whose cancer progresses while using a PARPi. However, the treatment consensus after PARPi has not been established. The aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3056/NIRVANA-R trial is to investigate the efficacy of niraparib in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients who were previously treated with a PARPi., Methods: The KGOG 3056/NIRVANA-R is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer recruited from seven KGOG sites. This study included patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy and had been treated with a PARPi. Mucinous histology type was excluded. Patients who had responded to the last platinum regimen (either complete or partial response) were eligible to participate in this study. Forty-four patients will be recruited. All enrolled patients are treated with niraparib and bevacizumab for maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The primary endpoint of the study is 6-month progression-free survival rate. Accrual is expected to be completed in 2022, followed by presentation of results in 2023., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734665., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: To compare survival outcomes between bevacizumab (BEV) and olaparib (OLA) maintenance therapy in BRCA -mutated, platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC)., Methods: From 10 institutions, we identified HGSOC patients with germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, who experienced platinum-sensitive recurrence between 2013 and 2019, and received second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were divided into BEV (n=29), OLA (n=83), and non-BEV/non-OLA users (n=36). The OLA and non-BEV/non-OLA users were grouped as the OLA intent group. We conducted 1:2 nearest neighbor-matching between the BEV and OLA intent groups, setting the proportion of OLA users in the OLA intent group from 65% to 100% at 5% intervals, and compared survival outcomes among the matched groups., Results: Overall, OLA users showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than BEV users (median, 23.8 vs. 17.4 months; p=0.004). Before matching, PFS improved in the OLA intent group but marginal statistical significance (p=0.057). After matching, multivariate analyses adjusting confounders identified intention-to-treat OLA as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS in the OLA 65P (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.505; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.280-0.911; p=0.023) to OLA 100P (aHR=0.348; 95% CI=0.184-0.658; p=0.001) datasets. The aHR of intention-to-treat OLA for recurrence decreased with increasing proportions of OLA users. No differences in overall survival were observed between the BEV and OLA intent groups, and between the BEV and OLA users., Conclusion: Compared to BEV, intention-to-treat OLA and actual use of OLA maintenance therapy were significantly associated with decreased disease recurrence risk in patients with BRCA -mutated, PSR HGSOC., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2021. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: This study aimed to determine the association of serum GGT levels with the risk of developing endometrial cancer. Women's obesity and menopausal status were also taken into account in our analysis., Methods: We used a nationwide cohort to examine the association between serum GGT levels and endometrial cancer development in Korean women. Data were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) healthcare system. Women aged over 19 years who participated in the Korea National Health Screening Examination in 2009 and were not diagnosed with endometrial cancer 1-year post-examination were included in our study (n = 2,736,588)., Results: Obese (BMI, ≥25 kg/m 2 ) women with increased GGT levels were at high risk of endometrial cancer (HR = 1.415, 95% CI: 1.236-1.621). Interestingly, in pre-menopausal women, high GGT level (Q4) was associated with the increased endometrial cancer risk only for obese women (HR = 1.482, 95% CI: 1.205-1.821). In post-menopausal women, only a high GGT level (Q4) was also associated with the increased cancer risk for obese women (HR = 1.313, 95% CI: 1.096-1.573). We observed a significant association between high GGT levels and increased risk of endometrial cancer in pre-menopausal women with abdominal obesity (WC, ≥85 cm) (HR = 1.647, 95% CI: 1.218-2.227)., Conclusions: Increased GGT level is an independent risk factor of endometrial cancer, especially for post-menopausal women and obese pre-menopausal women. These results may suggest that serum GGT levels might be useful in the risk stratification of endometrial cancer. Adopting a healthy lifestyle for lowering serum GGT level is warranted, especially for women with a higher risk of developing endometrial cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to present a single institutional experience with BRCA1/2 gene tests and the effects of pathogenic mutations in epithelial peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancer (POFTC) on survival outcomes., Materials and Methods: We identified patients with epithelial POFTCs who underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing by either germline or somatic methods between March 2007 and March 2020. Based on the BRCA1/2 test results, patients were divided into BRCA mutation and wild-type groups, followed by comparisons of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes after primary treatment., Results: The annual number of POFTC patients who received BRCA1/2 gene tests increased gradually. In total, 511 patients were included and BRCA1/2 mutations were observed in 143 (28.0%). Among 57 patients who received both germline and somatic tests, three (5.3%) showed discordant results from the two tests. Overall, no differences in progression-free survival (PFS; p=0.467) and overall survival (p=0.641) were observed between the BRCA mutation and wild-type groups; however, multivariate analyses identified BRCA1/2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.765; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.593 to 0.987; p=0.040). In 389 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV, different results were shown depending on primary treatment strategy: while BRCA1/2 mutation significantly improved PFS in the subgroup of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (aHR, 0.619; 95% CI, 0.385 to 0.995; p=0.048), it did not affect patient PFS in the subgroup of primary debulking surgery (aHR, 0.759; 95% CI, 0.530 to 1.089; p=0.135)., Conclusion: BRCA1/2 mutations are frequently observed in patients with epithelial POFTCs, and such patients showed better PFS than did those harboring wild-type BRCA1/2.

Objective: To investigate pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) of the cervix and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs)., Methods: We retrospectively identified 297 patients who underwent both CDB and LEEP for HSILs in cervical cytology between 2015 and 2018, and compared their pathologic results. Considering the LEEP to be the gold standard, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of CDB for identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, and cancer (HSIL+). We also performed age subgroup analyses., Results: Among the study population, 90.9% (270/297) had pathologic HSIL+ using the LEEP. The diagnostic performance of CDB for identifying HSIL+ was as follows: sensitivity, 87.8%; specificity, 59.3%; balanced accuracy, 73.6%; positive predictive value, 95.6%; and negative predictive value, 32.7%. Thirty-three false negative cases of CDB included CIN2,3 (n=29) and cervical cancer (n=4). The pathologic HSIL+ rate in patients with HSIL- by CDB was 67.3% (33/49). CDB exhibited a significant difference in the diagnosis of HSIL+ compared to LEEP in all patients (p<0.001). In age subgroup analyses, age groups <35 years and 35-50 years showed good agreement with the entire data set (p=0.496 and p=0.406, respectively), while age group ≥50 years did not (p=0.036)., Conclusion: A significant pathologic discrepancy was observed between CDB and LEEP results in women with cytologic HSILs. The diagnostic inaccuracy of CDB increased in those ≥50 years of age., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2020. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: To compare survival outcomes of primary laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH) in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer., Methods: We retrospectively identified stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer patients who received either LRH (n = 343) or ORH (n = 222) at two tertiary institutional hospitals between 2000 and 2018. To adjust for confounders, we conducted Mahalanobis distance-based sample matching for stage, histology, cervical mass size, parametrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Then, survival outcomes were compared between the matched groups. Through the independent matching processes, we narrowed the study population to stage IB1 patients and stage IB1 patients with tumor size ≤2 cm on pre-operative MRI., Results: After matching, LRH group showed poorer progression-free survival (PFS) than ORH group (3-year: 85.4% vs. 91.8%; P = 0.036), whereas no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was found. Regarding recurrence patterns, no significant differences in the incidences of pelvic, retroperitoneal lymph node and abdominal recurrences, or distant metastasis were observed between the two groups. Among the matched patients with stage IB1 who had cervical mass size ≤2 cm, the LRH and ORH groups showed similar PFS (3-year: 90.0% vs. 93.1%; P = 0.8) and OS (5-year: 98.6% vs. 96.4%; P = 0.6)., Conclusions: Despite the retrospective design, our matched cohort study suggests that ORH might be preferable for the surgical treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer. However, in stage IB1 patients with tumor size ≤2 cm, LRH might be applicable, as equivalent outcomes were found regardless of the surgical approach. Further prospective studies are warranted., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare survival outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy (RH) among patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC)., Methods: We retrospectively identified stage IB1-IIA2 CC patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open Type C RH between 2000 and 2018. Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were compared according to the surgical approach. For a more robust statistical analysis, we narrowed the study population down to the patients with stage IB1 who underwent pre-operative MRI., Results: In total, 435 and 158 patients were assigned to open surgery and MIS groups, respectively. MIS group had significantly less parametrial invasion (6.3% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.004). Despite similar proportions of patients received adjuvant treatment, concurrent chemoradiation therapy was performed less frequently in MIS group. After a median follow up of 114.8 months, the groups showed similar overall survival; however, MIS group displayed poorer progression-free survival (PFS; 5-year rate, 78.5% vs. 89.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified MIS as an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 2.883; 95% CI, 1.711-4.859; P < 0.001). Consistent results were observed among 349 patients with stage IB1: MIS was associated with higher recurrence rates (adjusted HR, 2.276; 95% CI, 1.039-4.986; P = 0.040). However, MIS did not influence PFS of stage IB1 patients with cervical mass size ≤2 cm on pre-operative MRI (adjusted HR, 1.146; 95% CI, 0.278-4.724; P = 0.850)., Conclusions: Overall, MIS RH was associated with higher recurrence rates than open RH in patients with early-stage CC. However, MIS was not a poor prognostic factor among those with stage IB1 and cervical mass size ≤2 cm on pre-operative MRI., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze whole exome sequencing (WES) data on ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in Korean patients via the technique of next generation sequencing (NGS). Genomic profiles were compared between endometriosis-associated OCCC (EMS-OCCC) and Non-EMS-OCCC., Methods: We used serum samples and cancer tissues, stored at the Seoul National University Hospital Human Biobank, that were initially collected from women diagnosed with OCCC between 2012 and 2016. In total, 15 patients were enrolled: 5 with pathologically confirmed EMS-OCCC and 10 with Non-EMS-OCCC. We performed NGS WES on 15 fresh frozen OCCC tissues and matched serum samples, enabling comprehensive genomic characterization of OCCC., Results: OCCC was characterized by complex genomic alterations, with a median of 178 exonic mutations (range, 111-25,798) and a median of 343 somatic copy number variations (range, 43-1,820) per tumor sample. In all, 54 somatic mutations were discovered across 14 genes, including PIK3CA (40%), ARID1A (40%), and KRAS (20%) in the 15 Korean OCCCs. Copy number gains in NTRK1 (33%), MYC (40%), and GNAS (47%) and copy number losses in TET2 (73%), TSC1 (67%), BRCA2 (60%), and SMAD4 (47%) were frequent. The significantly altered pathways were associated with proliferation and survival (including the PI3K/AKT, TP53, and ERBB2 pathways) in 87% of OCCCs and with chromatin remodeling in 47% of OCCCs. No significant differences in frequencies of genetic alterations were detected between EMS-OCCC and Non-EMS-OCCC groups., Conclusion: We successfully characterized the genomic landscape of 15 Korean patients with OCCC. We identified potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of this malignancy., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the uptake rate of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and the factors affecting this rate among female BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers at the National Cancer Center of Korea., Methods: Between April 2007 and December 2014, 450 women underwent BRCA gene testing, and 97 women were found to have BRCA1/2 mutations. Through the review of medical records, 42 candidates for RRSO were identified. Of these, 22 underwent RRSO. Demographic, clinical, and consultation-related factors were compared between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups., Results: The uptake rate of RRSO was 52.4 %. The mean time interval between genetic testing and surgery in the RRSO group was 7.3 months (range 0.6-33.9). The prevalence of amenorrhea was greater in the RRSO group than in the non-RRSO group (59.1 % vs. 20.0 %; P = 0.010). More women in the RRSO group were consulted with gynecologic oncologists (95.5 % vs. 60.0 %; P = 0.008). In multivariate analyses, amenorrhea at the time of genetic counseling (OR 16.44; 95 % CI 1.16-232.82; P = 0.038) and consultation with gynecologic oncologists (OR 30.78; 95 % CI 1.34-707.21; P = 0.032) were identified as factors affecting the carrier's decision to undergo RRSO. One patient in the non-RRSO group (5.0 %) developed primary peritoneal carcinoma, which was diagnosed 4.6 years after genetic testing., Conclusions: The uptake rate of RRSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was affected by the presence of amenorrhea and consultation with gynecologic oncologists. Gynecologic oncologists with clinical experience with ovarian cancer should play a major role in aiding carriers' decision-making concerning RRSO.

Objective: To investigate trends in the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), according to histologic subtypes, in Korean women between 1999 and 2012., Methods: Data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry recorded between 1999 and 2012 were evaluated. The incidences of EOC histologic subtypes were counted. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percentage changes (APCs) in incidence rates were calculated. Patient data were divided into three groups based on age (<40, 40 to 59, and >59 years), and age-specific incidence rates were compared., Results: Overall, the incidence of EOC has increased. Annual EOC cases increased from 922 in 1999 to 1,775 in 2012. In 1999, the ASR was 3.52 per 100,000 and increased to 4.79 per 100,000 in 2012 (APC, 2.53%; p<0.001). The ASRs in 2012 and APCs between 1999 and 2012 for the four major histologic subtypes were as follows (in order of incidence): serous carcinoma (ASR, 2.32 per 100,000; APC, 4.34%; p<0.001), mucinous carcinoma (ASR, 0.73 per 100,000; APC, -1.05%; p=0.131), endometrioid carcinoma (ASR, 0.51 per 100,000; APC, 1.48%; p=0.032), and clear cell carcinoma (ASR, 0.50 per 100,000; APC, 8.13%; p<0.001). In the sub-analyses based on age, clear cell carcinoma was confirmed as the histologic subtype whose incidence had increased the most since 1999., Conclusion: The incidence of EOC is increasing in Korea. Among the histologic subtypes, the incidence of clear cell carcinoma has increased markedly across all age groups since 1999.

Breast cancer is the most common type of female cancer. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is widely used to decrease breast cancer recurrence and mortality among patients. However, it also increases the risk of endometrial cancer. This study aimed to assess knowledge and decisional conflict regarding tamoxifen use. Between June and October 2014, breast cancer patients using tamoxifen were consecutively screened and requested to complete a survey including the EQ-5D, Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and a self-developed, 15-item questionnaire measuring tamoxifen-related knowledge. The study sample comprised 299 patients. The mean total knowledge score was 63.4 of a possible 100.0 (range, 13.3-93.3). While 73.9% of the participants knew that tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence, only 57.9% knew that the drug increases endometrial cancer risk. A higher education level (≥ college) was associated with a higher, total knowledge score (β = 4.291; P = 0.017). A higher knowledge score was associated with a decreased DCS score (β = -0.366; P < 0.001). A higher SWD score was also associated with decreased decisional conflict (β = -0.178; P < 0.001). In conclusion, the breast cancer patients with higher levels of tamoxifen-related knowledge showed lower levels of decisional conflict regarding tamoxifen use. Clinicians should provide the exact information about tamoxifen treatment to patients, based on knowledge assessment results, so as to aid patients' decision-making with minimal conflict.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of lower limb lymphedema (LLL) on quality of life (QOL) in cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer survivors after pelvic lymph node dissection., Study Design: A cross-sectional case-control study was performed using the Korean version of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ-K) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). In total, 25 women with LLL and 28 women without LLL completed both questionnaires., Results: The GCLQ-K total symptom score and scores for swelling-general, swelling-limb, and heaviness were significantly higher in the LLL group than in the control group. In the EORTC QLQ-C30, the LLL group reported more financial difficulties compared to the control group (mean score, 16.0 vs. 6.0; P=0.035). Global health status was poorer in the LLL group with borderline statistical significance (mean score, 62.7 vs. 71.4; P=0.069). Spearman's correlations suggested that global health status in the EORTC QLQ-C30 correlated with the GCLQ-K total symptom score (in the LLL group, R=-0.64, P=0.001; in the control group, R=-0.42, P=0.027)., Conclusions: QOL decreases due to LLL-related symptoms and financial difficulty in women with LLL. Well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)