Search

We evaluated the efficacy of tenofovir (TDF)-based rescue therapy and compared the outcomes of TDF monotherapy and TDF-based nucleoside analog (NA) combination therapy in patients with suboptimal response (SOR) to adefovir (ADV) with or without NAs in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B. All study subjects received ADV with or without NAs due to prior LAM resistance, and were then switched to TDF-based rescue therapy due to SOR (hepatitis B virus DNA >20 IU/ml after at least 6 months of therapy). A total of 125 patients were eligible. The overall cumulative proportion of complete virologic response (CVR) was 64 of 74 patients (86.5%) at 48 weeks of treatment. During the follow-up period of 48 weeks, there was no significant difference in CVR rate (P = 0.750) between the TDF monotherapy (n = 18) and the TDF with NA groups (n = 107). Patients with ADV genotypic mutations showed inferior antiviral responses to TDF compared with the patients without ADV genotypic mutations, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.069). Partial virological response to prior ADV therapy showed higher CVR rates compared to patients with non-response at 12 weeks (P = 0.013), but there was no significant difference after 24 (P = 0.076) and 48 weeks (P = 0.198) of treatment. TDF monotherapy is as effective as TDF plus NA combination therapy in patients with SOR to ADV-based rescue therapy and LAM resistance. TDF, with or without NAs, was effective even in cases of ADV resistance., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy is one of the useful treatment option for the patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had failed on prior nucleos(t) ide analogue (NA) treatments. This study compared the efficacies of the combinations of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV in patients who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments. This retrospective analysis included 148 consecutive patients with CHB infection in Korea (n = 37 with ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and n = 111 with ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV). The virological and biochemical responses were compared between the two groups. The cumulative probability of viral suppression of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV was not inferior to that of ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.08; P = 0.094). The changes in serum HBV DNA level in the ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV group were not different between the two groups over 12 months. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in acquiring ETV-resistant variants between the two groups during the treatment (HR, 0.95; P = 0.953). This study suggests the proof-of-concept that the lower dose of NA in combination with other NA might be the theoretical option for rescue combination therapy in patients with CHB who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments in order to reduce systemic exposure and possible side effects of NA., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)