Search

Parental substance misuse has a pervasive impact on family functioning, parenting, and, ultimately, child wellbeing and development. Subsequently, linkages with informal and formal support networks are crucial for ameliorating risk. To facilitate engagement with these families prior to identification in child protection systems, it is vital to understand the factors inhibiting and promoting engagement with informal and formal support. This paper examines how different factors influence informal and formal help‐seeking by alcohol‐misusing parents with regard to parenting and family concerns. Parents reporting alcohol problems in a clinical range (n = 322) were drawn from a representative parent sample (n = 1991). Alcohol‐misusing parents reported low help‐seeking for parenting‐focused support services. The findings particularly highlight the role of age, education, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, parenting stress, empowerment and trust in support services for predicting parents' help‐seeking. 'Examines how different factors influence informal and formal help‐seeking by alcohol‐misusing parents with regard to parenting and family concerns' Key Practitioner Messages: The role of practitioners working in family welfare and child protection services in identifying and facilitating support for alcohol-misusing families is described.Parenting‐focused support services need to be promoted, especially for vulnerable parent populations.Education of service providers along with the wider community is required to foster and increase trust and support uptake before alcohol-misusing families become involved with statutory systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To test, under randomized field trial conditions, the impact of police using the principles of procedural justice during routine encounters with citizens on attitudes towards drink-driving, perceptions of compliance, and their satisfaction with the police. Methods: We conducted the first randomized field trial-the 'Queensland Community Engagement Trial' (QCET)-to test the impact of police engaging with citizens by operationalizing the key ingredients of procedural justice (neutrality, citizen participation, respect, and trustworthy motives) in a short, high-volume police-citizen encounter. We randomly allocated 60 roadside Random Breath Testing (RBT) operations to control (business-as-usual) and experimental (procedural justice) conditions. Driver surveys were used to measure the key outcomes: attitudes towards drinking and driving, satisfaction with police and perceptions of compliance. Results: Citizen perceptions of the encounter revealed that the experimental treatment was delivered as planned. We also found significant differences between the experimental and control groups on all key outcome measures: drivers who received the experimental RBT encounter were 1.24 times more likely to report that their views on drinking and driving had changed than the control group; experimental respondents reported small but higher levels of compliance ( d = .07) and satisfaction ( d = .18) with police during the encounter than did their control group counterparts. Conclusions: Our results show that the way citizens perceive the police can be influenced by the way in which police interact with citizens during routine encounters, and demonstrate the positive benefits of police using the principles of procedural justice. Our study was limited by the use of paper-only surveys and low response rate. We also recognize that the experiment setting (RBT road blocks) is limiting and non-reflective of the wider set of routine police-citizen encounters. Future research should be undertaken, using experimental methods, to replicate our field operationalization of procedural justice in different types of police-citizen encounters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]