Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has put chronic pressure on worldwide healthcare systems. While the literature regarding the prevalence of psychological distress and associated risk factors among healthcare workers facing COVID-19 has exploded, biological variables have been mostly overlooked., Methods: 467 healthcare workers from Quebec, Canada, answered an electronic survey covering various risk factors and mental health outcomes three months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of them, 372 (80%) provided a hair sample, providing a history of cortisol secretion for the three months preceding and following the pandemic's start. We used multivariable regression models and a receiver operating characteristic curve to study hair cortisol as a predictor of burnout and psychological health, together with individual, occupational, social, and organizational factors., Results: As expected, hair cortisol levels increased after the start of the pandemic, with a median relative change of 29% (IQR = 3-59%, p < 0.0001). There was a significant association between burnout status and change in cortisol, with participants in the second quarter of change having lower odds of burnout. No association was found between cortisol change and post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression symptoms. Adding cortisol to individual-occupational-socio-organizational factors noticeably enhanced our burnout logistic regression model's predictability., Conclusion: Change in hair cortisol levels predicted burnout at three months in health personnel at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This non-invasive biological marker of the stress response could be used in further clinical or research initiatives to screen high-risk individuals to prevent and control burnout in health personnel facing an important stressor., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac arrest is a tragic event that causes 1 death roughly every 90 seconds worldwide. Survivors generally undergo a workup to identify the cause of arrest. However, 5% to 10% of cardiac arrests remain unexplained. Because cardiac arrhythmias underlie most cardiac arrests and increasing evidence strongly supports the involvement of autoantibodies in arrhythmogenesis, a large-panel autoantibody screening was performed in patients with cardiac arrest., Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study of patients from the Montreal Heart Institute hospital cohort, a single-center registry of participants. A peptide microarray was designed to screen for immunoglobulin G targeting epitopes from all known cardiac ion channels with extracellular domains. Plasma samples from 23 patients with unexplained cardiac arrest were compared with those from 22 patients with cardiac arrest cases of ischemic origin and a group of 29 age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched healthy subjects. The false discovery rate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, and random forest methods were carried out jointly to find significant differential immunoglobulin G responses., Results: The autoantibody against the pore domain of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel was consistently identified as a biomarker of idiopathic cardiac arrest ( P =0.002; false discovery rate, 0.007; classification accuracies ≥0.83). Functional studies on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes demonstrated that the anti-L-type voltage-gated calcium channel immunoglobulin G purified from patients with idiopathic cardiac arrest is proarrhythmogenic by reducing the action potential duration through calcium channel inhibition., Conclusions: The present report addresses the concept of autoimmunity and cardiac arrest. Hitherto unknown autoantibodies targeting extracellular sequences of cardiac ion channels were detected. Moreover, the study identified an autoantibody signature specific to patients with cardiac arrest.

Background and Purpose: Data on oral anticoagulant (OAC) uptake and pattern of use are limited. Real-life data in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are important for understanding patient exposure. A cohort study of new OAC users was built to assess trends of drug use from 2011 to 2017, persistence rate, switching rate, adherence level, and predictors of adherence., Methods: We built a cohort using the Régie d'Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and Med-Echo administrative databases of new adult OAC users within 1 year following hospitalization with a diagnosis of AF. New users of OAC were defined as having no OAC claims in the year before cohort entry. We assessed trends of OAC use; persistence rate, defined as a gap between refills of no longer than two times the duration of the previous prescriptions; and adherence level, defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a 1-year period following initiation. Predictors of nonadherence (PDC less than 80%) were analyzed using logistic regression models., Results: The cohort consisted of 33,311 incident OAC users. Of total OAC claims, the proportions of warfarin claims decreased from 77.9% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2017, with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) accounting for 87.3% of claims, of which apixaban and rivaroxaban accounted for 60.1% and 23.4%, respectively, by the end of 2017. One year after OAC initiation, persistence rates ranged from 53% with warfarin to 77% with a high dose of apixaban. Approximately 75% of incident OAC users were considered "adherent" (PDC 80% or more), with a mean PDC of 95.6-98.1%, compared with "nonadherent," with a mean PDC varying between 43.1% and 50.7%. Older age, female sex, higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (to predict thromboembolic risk in AF), prior stroke, and treatment with chronic cardiovascular disease drugs were associated with high adherence levels., Conclusion: The clinical uptake of DOACs increased over time, accounting for 87.3% of prescriptions in 2017. In our study, 25% of new OAC users presented a low adherence level. Adherence to OACs remains a significant challenge in patients with AF., (© 2019 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Given the healthcare risks and societal impacts associated with CAD, their clinical management would benefit from improved prevention and prediction tools. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on an individual's genome sequence are emerging as potentially powerful biomarkers to predict the risk to develop CAD. Two recently derived genome-wide PRS have shown high specificity and sensitivity to identify CAD cases in European-ancestry participants from the UK Biobank. However, validation of the PRS predictive power and transferability in other populations is now required to support their clinical utility., Methods: We calculated both PRS (GPS CAD and metaGRS CAD ) in French-Canadian individuals from 3 cohorts totaling 3639 prevalent CAD cases and 7382 controls and tested their power to predict prevalent, incident, and recurrent CAD. We also estimated the impact of the founder French-Canadian familial hypercholesterolemia deletion ( LDLR delta >15 kb deletion) on CAD risk in one of these cohorts and used this estimate to calibrate the impact of the PRS., Results: Our results confirm the ability of both PRS to predict prevalent CAD comparable to the original reports (area under the curve=0.72-0.89). Furthermore, the PRS identified about 6% to 7% of individuals at CAD risk similar to carriers of the LDLR delta >15 kb mutation, consistent with previous estimates. However, the PRS did not perform as well in predicting an incident or recurrent CAD (area under the curve=0.56-0.60), maybe because of confounding because 76% of the participants were on statin treatment. This result suggests that additional work is warranted to better understand how ascertainment biases and study design impact PRS for CAD., Conclusions: Collectively, our results confirm that novel, genome-wide PRS is able to predict CAD in French Canadians; with further improvements, this is likely to pave the way towards more targeted strategies to predict and prevent CAD-related adverse events.

Background          Adherence to statins is often sub-optimal and declines over time. Direct costs incurred by patients are frequently cited as responsible for inadequate statin adherence. To determine whether survivors of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who benefit from low or no cost drug dispensation, have optimal long-term adherence to statins, we aimed to evaluate the ten-year adherence to statin of these patients. Methods          The AMI-QUEBEC Study follows a cohort of STEMI survivors hospitalized at 17 hospitals in Quebec, Canada during the year 2003. We obtained their 10-year data on lipid lowering therapy (LLT) consumption. Optimal adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered of ≥80%. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine factors independently associated with optimal adherence to statins. Results          Complete 10-year data on statin dispensation was available for 524 patients. Optimal adherence remained stable over time at 80% and more during the 10-year follow-up period. During the last five years, 12% of patients did not use any LLT. Older age, living in less socially deprived areas, concomitant use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and admission to hospitals with percutaneous coronary interventions facilities (PCI-hospitals) were associated with improved statin adherence.   Conclusion Future studies are needed to explore the potential factors associated with concomitant use of ACEI/ARB, and admission to PCI-hospitals that may have optimized statin adherence. Socially deprived patients may benefit from more support and encouragement to enhance their long-term statin adherence.

The characteristics and predictors of long-term recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events (RICEs) after myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) have not yet been clarified. We aimed to characterize the 10-year incidence, types, and predictors of RICE. We obtained 10-year follow-up of STEMI survivors at 17 Quebec hospitals in Canada (the AMI-QUEBEC Study) in 2003. There were 858 patients; mean age was 60 years and 73% were male. The majority of patients receive reperfusion therapy; 53.3% and 39.2% of patients received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and fibrinolytic therapy, respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients underwent in-hospital PCI (elective, rescue, and primary). At 10 years, 42% of patients suffered a RICE, with most RICEs (88%) caused by recurrent cardiac ischemia. The risk of RICE was the highest during the first year (23.5 per patient-year). At 10 years, the all-cause mortality was 19.3%, with 1/3 of deaths being RICE-related. Previous cardiovascular event, heart failure during the index STEMI hospitalization, discharge prescription of calcium blocker increased the risk of RICE by almost twofold. Each point increase in TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) score augmented the risk of RICE by 6%, whereas discharge prescription of dual antiplatelets reduced the risk of RICE by 23%. Our findings suggested that survivors of STEMI remain at high long-term risk of RICE despite high rate of reperfusion therapy and in-hospital PCI. Patients with previous cardiovascular event, in-hospital heart failure, and high TIMI score were particularly susceptible to RICE. Future studies are needed to confirm the impacts of calcium blocker and dual antiplatelets on long-term risk of RICE., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrated the superior efficacy of enoxaparin (ENOX) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The external validity of randomized controlled trials may be limited by selective inclusion of patients who are younger and healthier than the 'real-life' population., Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ENOX compared with UFH in unselected STEMI patients., Methods: The safety and effectiveness of ENOX and UFH were compared in STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy at 17 Quebec hospitals in 2003., Results: A total of 498 STEMI patients received systemic anticoagulation, with ENOX and UFH administered in 114 and 384 patients, respectively. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two patient groups. The rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebral events were 11.4% in the ENOX group compared with 14.0% in the UFH group (P=0.51). In-hospital death or nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 7.9% of patients who received ENOX compared with 9.9% of patients who received UFH (P=0.52). Major bleeding occurred in 4.4% of patients who received ENOX versus 6.0% in patients who received UFH (P=0.51)., Interpretation: There was no significant difference in the rates of in-hospital adverse events in the ENOX group compared with the UFH group, when used in the real-life context. Larger observational studies may further confirm the safety, effectiveness and optimal duration of the administration of ENOX in unselected STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis.

The Génome Québec and Montreal Heart Institute Pharmacogenomics Centre (Montreal, Canada), created in 2006, is a translational pharmacogenomics platform whose main objectives are to conduct pharmacogenomics research, provide pharmacogenomics services to the academic, biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors, and integrate pharmacogenomics solutions into the healthcare system. The Centre has brought together a multidisciplinary team of researchers with expertise in genomics, bioinformatics and clinical trial research. All the Centre's clinical research studies are supported by the Centre's unique Good Laboratory Practice facility framework, which has the ability to perform pharmaceutical clinical trials and deliver clinical diagnostics under the highest standards. The Centre has successfully leveraged its experience and expertise in technology development and pharmacogenomics clinical trial work to attract funding and collaborative partnerships in both the public and private sectors.

Self-reported leisure-time physical activity level correlates well with both cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV mortality in subjects without coronary heart disease (CHD). The impact of leisure-time physical activity on long-term outcomes has not been well studied in patients with preexisting CHD, who are often physically limited because of symptoms, medications, and co-morbid conditions. The aim was to determine the long-term prognostic value of self-reported leisure-time physical activity in a large CHD cohort. Leisure-time physical activity was evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire and categorized using a 4-level scale (sedentary, mild, moderate, and strenuous) in 14,021 of 24,958 subjects from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registry with suspected or proven CHD who underwent cardiac catheterization from 1974 to 1979. Median long-term follow-up was 14.7 years (interquartile range 9.8 to 16.2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to physical activity level and adjusted for potential confounders. Long-term all-cause and CV mortality progressively increased from most to least active subjects, with sedentary patients showing a 1.6-fold increase in mortality for both these outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34 to 1.97, p <0.0001 for all-cause mortality). Similar trends were noted for men and women and in adjusted models, although HRs were attenuated after adjusting for age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, body mass index, and ejection fraction (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.49, p = 0.03 for all-cause mortality; adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.57, p = 0.05 for CV mortality). In conclusion, leisure-time physical activity independently predicted long-term survival in men and women with chronic stable CHD.

Although stent under-deployment (SU) has been associated with increased risk of in-stent restenosis, little data have been reported on the incidence of SU in patients presenting with clinical in-stent restenosis. In 59 patients referred for vascular brachytherapy and showing angiographic in-stent restenosis, we sought (1) to determine the incidence of SU using standard intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria (2) to evaluate the effects of repeat angioplasty on further stent expansion. Stented length was 32+/-17 mm and diameter stenosis was 75+/-14%. Before re-intervention, the incidence of reduced absolute values of minimal stent cross-sectional area (MSCSA) varied from 69% (< or =8 mm2) to 15% (< or =5 mm2). After re-intervention, the incidence decreased to 24% (< or =8 mm2) (p = 0.0001) and 0% (< or =5 mm2) (p = 0.005). Before re-intervention, SU as assessed by relative criteria varied from 21% (80% mean reference lumen area or 90% minimum distal reference lumen area) to 28% (100% minimum reference lumen area). After re-intervention, the incidence of SU varied from 7% (90% minimum distal reference lumen area) (p = 0.0001 vs. pre) to 24% (55% mean reference EEM area) (p = ns). No change in strut apposition (97% pre vs. 100% post) nor in symmetry index (100% pre vs. post) was noted. From all criteria, the 90 and 100% minimum reference lumen area criteria were the most altered by repeat balloon dilatation, 21% pre vs. 7% post and 28% pre vs. 11% post, respectively. In conclusion, among patients presenting with severe angiographic in-stent restenosis, a significant number showed signs of SU whose incidence varied according to applied criteria. Significant stent re-expansion can be obtained following IVUS-guided repeat angioplasty irrespective of initial SU criteria.