Search

Postgraduate residency programs must ensure that residents are properly trained in all core competencies. The CanMEDS framework of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada has established seven such competencies: medical expert, communicator, collaborator, manager, health advocate, scholar, and professional. The authors describe an integrated, one-month multispecialty rotation for first-year residents, Introduction to CanMEDS Core Competencies, at Laval University, Quebec, Canada. The goal of the rotation was to offer an in-depth and simultaneous training in each of the seven competencies. A pilot rotation was offered from February 9 to March 7, 2004 and involved 42 residents from seven programs and 30 faculty. It addressed 12 content areas related to the core competencies, through teaching formats promoting experiential and reflective learning. It involved three significant innovations: an intensive month-long format, during which residents were freed from most clinical duties; a multispecialty teaching and socialization strategy between peers and with faculty; and an integrated reflective approach, to ensure residents' understanding of the relevance and application of the core competencies in their own specialty. Although demanding to organize, the pilot rotation was well received. Residents were rapidly introduced to all competencies, and they developed an integrated perspective of them. An evaluation of impact is underway.

A 90-minute interactive workshop, offered to small groups on request, was developed to help physicians include evidence-based preventive interventions in their practices. Between 25 September 1996 and 10 December 1997, 593 family physicians throughout the Province of Quebec (Canada) participated in one of the 40 workshops presented in all the regions of Quebec. Almost all participants (98%) completed the self-administered questionnaire. Their opinion of the achievement of three workshop objectives were evaluated using a seven-point Likert scale (-3 to +3)as their perception of the direct impact of the workshop on their practice. The workshop objectives were reached to a high degree: 2.1 (sd 0.90) for prescribing a proper check-up for adults; 1.83(sd 1.02) for explaining to the patient the reasons motivating his/her choice to include or exclude certain tests; 2.09 (sd 0.93)for using concrete and useful tool facilitating the integration of preventive measures in his/her professional practice. Female physicians and those under 40 perceived that the objectives were reached to a greater degree. Participants indicate their intention to modify their practice according to the clinical practice guidelines presented in the workshop.

Objective: To determine and classify the difficulties of first-year family medicine residents observed during clinical interviews., Design: Retrospective, descriptive study., Setting: Family practice unit at a teaching hospital., Participants: Forty-seven of the 56 first-year family medicine residents during their 2-month compulsory rotation in ambulatory family medicine, between July 1983 and December 1988, and 4 physicians who supervised the residents., Main Outcome Measure: The residents' difficulties noted on the observation forms., Main Results: A total of 1500 difficulties were observed during 194 interviews, an average of 7.7 (standard deviation 5.2) per interview. There were 167 different difficulties, which were classified into seven categories (introduction, initial contract, body of the interview, techniques and organization, interpersonal aspects, final contract and miscellaneous) and 20 subcategories. The 17 most frequently noted difficulties accounted for 40% of the total., Conclusions: The results constitute a useful starting point for developing a classification of residents' difficulties during clinical interviews. We believe that the list of difficulties is applicable to residents at all levels and in other specialties, especially in ambulatory settings. The list can be used to develop learning materials for supervisors and residents.