Search

Background: Hypertension guidelines recommend moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for the primary or secondary prevention of hypertension. However, alternative modalities, such as high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on dry land or in water, have been studied less widely., Aim: To assess chronic blood pressure (BP) response to a 2-week training programme involving six sessions of either MICT or HIIT performed on dry land or HIIT performed in an immersed condition, in participants with baseline office systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP)≥130/85mmHg., Methods: We randomly assigned 42 individuals (mean age 65±7 years; 52% men) with baseline office SBP/DBP≥130/85mmHg to perform six 24-minute sessions on an ergocycle (three times a week for 2 weeks) of either MICT on dry land, HIIT on dry land or HIIT in a swimming pool, and assessed BP responses using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring., Results: While 2-week MICT and HIIT on dry land modified none of the 24-hour average haemodynamic variables significantly, immersed HIIT induced a significant decrease in 24-hour BP (SBP -5.1±7.3 [P=0.02]; DBP -2.9±4.1mmHg [P=0.02]) and daytime BP (SBP -6.2±8.3 [P=0.015]; DBP -3.4±4.0mmHg [P=0.008]), and slightly improved 24-hour and daytime pulse wave velocity (PWV) (24-hour PWV -0.17±0.23m/s [P=0.015]; daytime PWV -0.18±0.24m/s [P=0.02])., Conclusion: HIIT on an immersed stationary ergocycle is an innovative method that should be considered as an efficient non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension. As such, it should now be implemented in a larger cohort to study its long-term effects on the cardiovascular system., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to compare anaerobic running capacity (ARC, i.e., the distance that can be run using only stored energy sources in the muscle) determined from a 3-parameter systems model with other anaerobic indices and with running performance in the 800 m. Seventeen trained male subjects (.VO(2max) = 66.54 +/- 7.29 ml . min (-1) . kg (-1)) performed an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of .VO(2max) and peak treadmill velocity (PTV), five randomly ordered constant velocity tests at 95, 100, 105, 110, and 120 % of PTV to compute ARC and oxygen deficit (O(2)def, at 110 % of PTV), and a 800-m time trial to determine running performance (mean velocity over the distance, V (800 m)) and peak blood lactate concentration ([La (-)] (b, peak)). ARC (467 +/- 123 m) was positively correlated with O(2)def (56.35 +/- 18.47 ml . kg (-1); r = 0.57; p < 0.05), but not with [La (-)] (b, peak) (15.08 +/- 1.48 mmol . l (-1); r = - 0.16; p > 0.05). The O(2) equivalent of ARC (i.e., the product of ARC by the energy cost of running; 103.74 +/- 28.25 ml . kg (-1)), which is considered as an indirect estimation of O(2)def, was significantly higher than O(2)def (p < 0.01, effect size = 1.99). It was concluded that ARC is partially determined by anaerobic pathway, but that it probably does not provide an accurate measure of anaerobic capacity, if, however, O(2)def can be considered as a criterion measure for it.