Search

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as a rapidly spreading contagious disease across the globe. Recent studies showed that people with diabetes mellitus, severe obesity, and cardiovascular disease are at higher risk of mortality from COVID-19. It has been suggested that the increased risk is due to the chronic inflammatory state associated with type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pioglitazone, a strong insulin sensitizer with anti-inflammatory properties, in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted with moderate-severe COVID-19., Method: We enrolled 350 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to hospitals in Qatar and Kuwait with COVID-19. Patients were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, pioglitazone ( n = 189) or a matching placebo ( n = 161) for 28 days. The study had two primary outcomes: (1) the incidence of a composite outcome composed of (a) the requirement for mechanical ventilation, (b) death, and (c) myocardial damage; and (2) an increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels., Results: The first primary outcome occurred in 28 participants (8%), and the secondary outcome occurred in 17. Treatment with pioglitazone showed a significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-3 levels compared with placebo treatment (mean (SD) 2.73 (± 2.14) [95% CI: 0.02, 1.1], p = 0.043 vs. 2.28 (± 1.67) [95% CI: - 0.23, 0.86], p = 0.3, respectively), with no effect seen in the levels of other inflammatory markers. Even though not significant, a few of the patients on pioglitazone exhibited serum troponin levels > 3 times higher than the normal range seen in patients on placebo. On the other hand, more patients on pioglitazone were admitted to the ICU than those with placebo, and no significant difference in the CRP reduction was observed between the two groups., Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that pioglitazone treatment did not independently provide any additional clinical benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes admitted with a COVID-19 infection., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04604223., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Baagar, Alessa, Abu-Farha, Abubaker, Alhumaidi, Franco Ceruto, Hamad, Omrani, Abdelrahman, Zaka-Ul Haq, Safi, Alhariri, Barman, Abdelmajid, Cancio, Elmekaty, Al-Khairi, Cherian, Jayyousi, Ahmed, Qaddoumi, Hajji, Esmaeel, Al-Andaleeb, Channanath, Devarajan, Ali, Thanaraj, Al-Sabah, Al-Mulla, Abdul-Ghani and Jayyousi.)

Objective: The Qatar Study was designed to examine the efficacy of combination therapy with exenatide plus pioglitazone versus basal/bolus insulin in patients with long-standing poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin plus a sulfonylurea.Research Design and Methods: The study randomized 231 patients with poorly controlled (HbA1c >7.5%, 58 mmol/mol) T2DM on a sulfonylurea plus metformin to receive 1) pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy) or 2) basal plus prandial insulin (insulin therapy) to maintain HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol).Results: After a mean follow-up of 12 months, combination therapy caused a robust decrease in HbA1c from 10.0 ± 0.6% (86 ± 5.2 mmol/mol) at baseline to 6.1 ± 0.1% (43 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) compared with 7.1 ± 0.1% (54 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) in subjects receiving insulin therapy. Combination therapy was effective in lowering the HbA1c independent of sex, ethnicity, BMI, or baseline HbA1c. Subjects in the insulin therapy group experienced significantly greater weight gain and a threefold higher rate of hypoglycemia than patients in the combination therapy group.Conclusions: Combination exenatide/pioglitazone therapy is a very effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with long-standing poorly controlled T2DM on metformin plus a sulfonylurea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To assess the effect of exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Research Design and Methods: This is a substudy of the Qatar Study, an open-label, randomized controlled trial. 38 subjects with poorly controlled T2D were studied at baseline and 1-year follow-up and 18 control subjects were assessed at baseline only. A combination of exenatide (2 mg/week) and pioglitazone (30 mg/day) or glargine with aspart insulin were randomly assigned to patients to achieve an HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (<7%). DPN was assessed with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), DN4, vibration perception and sudomotor function., Results: Subjects with T2D had reduced corneal nerves, but other DPN measures were comparable with the control group. In the combination treatment arm (n=21), HbA1c decreased by 35.2 mmol/mol (3.8 %) (p<0.0001), body weight increased by 5.6 kg (p<0.0001), corneal nerve branch density increased (p<0.05), vibration perception worsened (p<0.05), and DN4 and sudomotor function showed no change. In the insulin treatment arm, HbA1c decreased by 28.7 mmol/mol (2.7 %) (p<0.0001), body weight increased by 4.6 kg (p<0.01), corneal nerve branch density and fiber length increased (p≤0.01), vibration perception improved (p<0.01), and DN4 and sudomotor function showed no change. There was no association between the change in CCM measures with change in HbA1c, weight or lipids., Conclusions: Treatment with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin results in corneal nerve regeneration, but no change in neuropathic symptoms or sudomotor function over 1 year., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Because of the unique mechanism of action of sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors (SGLT2i), which is independent of insulin secretion and insulin action, members of this class of drugs effectively lower plasma glucose concentration when used in combination with all other antidiabetic agents, including insulin. Increased plasma ketone concentration has been reported in association with SGLT2i initiation, which, under certain clinical conditions, has developed into diabetic ketoacidosis. The daily insulin dose often is reduced at the time of initiating SGLT2i therapy in insulin-treated patients to avoid hypoglycaemia. However, reduction of insulin dose can increase the risk of ketoacidosis. In the present study, we examined the effect of the addition of dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone on plasma ketone concentration in insulin-treated T2DM patients and compared the results to the effect of dapagliflozin alone. A total of 18 poorly controlled, insulin-treated T2DM participants in the Qatar Study received dapagliflozin (10 mg) plus pioglitazone (30 mg), and 10 poorly controlled non-insulin-treated T2DM patients received dapagliflozin (10 mg) alone for 4 months. Dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone produced a robust decrease in HbA1c (-1.4%) and resulted in a 50% reduction in daily insulin dose, from 133 to 66 units, while dapagliflozin alone caused a 0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Dapagliflozin caused a four-fold increase in fasting plasma ketone concentration, while the combination of pioglitazone plus dapagliflozin was not associated with a significant increase (0.13 vs 0.15 mM) in plasma ketone concentration or in risk of hypoglycaemia. These results demonstrate that the addition of pioglitazone to dapagliflozin prevents the increase in plasma ketone concentration associated with SGLT2i therapy., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The present study aims to identify predictors for response to combination therapy with pioglitazone plus exenatide vs basal/bolus insulin therapy in T2DM patients who are poorly controlled with maximum/near-maximum doses of metformin plus a sulfonylurea. Participants in the Qatar study received a 75-g OGTT with measurement of plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentration at baseline and were then randomized to receive either treatment with pioglitazone plus exenatide or basal/bolus insulin therapy for one year. Insulin secretion measured with plasma C-peptide concentration during the OGTT was the strongest predictor of response to combination therapy (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) with pioglitazone plus exenatide. A 54% increase in 2-hour plasma C-peptide concentration above the fasting level identified subjects who achieved the glycaemic goal (HbA1c < 7.0%) with 82% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Only baseline HbA1c was a predictor of response to basal/bolus insulin therapy. Thus, the increment in 2-hour plasma C-peptide concentration above the fasting level provides a useful tool to identify poorly controlled T2DM patients who can achieve glycaemic control without insulin therapy, and thereby, can be used to individualize antihyperglycaemic therapy in poorly controlled T2DM patients., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)