Search

Background: Previous studies have shown that histamine skin reactivity (the dimensions of a skin wheal elicited by a prick with histamine 10 mg/ml) in unselected school children has increased in Italy during the past two decades and is higher in Italy than in Poland. Hence this variable can probably be influenced by a changing or different lifestyle. The aim of this study was to compare skin reactivity to histamine and codeine (a marker of histamine releasability from mast cells) in schoolchildren from countries with different lifestyles., Methods: Six previously unstudied unselected populations of 9-year-old schoolchildren (two each from Poland, Italy, and Libya; n = 863 subjects; 49.0% males) were pricked with two concentrations of histamine (10 and 1 mg/ml) and codeine (90 and 9 mg/ml)., Results: The higher concentrations of both pharmacologic agents tested yielded significantly different wheal areas in the three countries: Poland < Italy < Libya (histamine, 11.8, 16.1 and 20.7 mm2; codeine, 9.2, 13.2 and 16.2 mm2; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The lower concentrations elicited almost matching results. Histamine wheal areas correlated closely with areas elicited by codeine in the same individual: angular coefficients of the histamine to codeine regression lines were 0.535, Italy; 0.551, Libya; 0.612, Poland; and 0.581 for the whole population. More histamine was needed to produce a wheal in Poland than in Libya: a 20-mm2 wheal required an injected histamine concentration of about 8.8 mg/ml in Libya, 29.5 mg/ml in Italy and 102.1 mg/ml in Poland., Conclusion: More studies are necessary to explain the observed international differences in skin histamine reactivity and their effect on the prevalence of positive allergen skin tests.

Several studies have shown a higher prevalence of positive skin-prick tests to airborne allergens in Western than in Eastern European countries. We have recently reported that skin histamine reactivity significantly increased in Italy over the past 15 years. Population differences in skin histamine reactivity could, at least in part, explain the reported differences in positive allergen skin tests. To test this hypothesis we compared histamine skin reactivity and the prevalence of allergen positive skin-prick tests in a sample of Italian and Polish schoolchildren. A total of 336 unselected 9-year-old-schoolchildren (198 in Italy and 138 in Poland) underwent skin-prick tests with three different histamine concentrations (10, 1 and 0.2 mg/ml) and with a panel of common airborne allergens according to the ISAAC protocol, phase two. Mean wheals elicited by skin-prick tests with the three serial concentrations of histamine were significantly larger (p < 0.001) and shifted more toward higher values (p < 0.001) in Italian than in Polish children. The differences were greater for the intermediate histamine concentration tested (1 mg/ml) than for the highest concentration (10 mg/ml). Skin-prick tests for airborne allergens were more frequently positive in Italian children: wheals >or= 3 mm induced by any allergen [odds ratio (OR) 1.69; confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.92] by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (OR 1.92; CI 0.97-3.80) and by D. farinae (OR 3.15; CI 1.16-8.63). Labeling as positive allergen wheal reactions half the size of the 10 mg/ml histamine wheal or larger reduced but did not abolish the Italian-Polish differences. The significantly higher skin histamine reactivity observed in Italian children could help to explain why allergen skin-test reactions differ in the East and West European populations. Moreover, differences in nonallergen-specific factors among populations should be considered in the interpretation of skin test results (e.g. cut-off points). To obtain meaningful results, epidemiological studies of allergies should include serial histamine dilutions.