Search

Background: Neonatal infections are a major cause of death worldwide. Simple procedures for identifying infants with infection that need referral for treatment are therefore of major public health importance., Methods: We investigated 3303 infants <2 months of age presenting with illness to health facilities in Ethiopia, The Gambia, Papua New Guinea and The Philippines, using a standardized approach. Historical factors and clinical signs predicting sepsis, meningitis, hypoxemia, deaths and an ordinal scale indicating severe disease were investigated by logistic regression, and the performance of simple combination rules was explored., Results: In multivariable analysis, reduced feeding ability, no spontaneous movement, temperature >38 degrees C, being drowsy/unconscious, a history of a feeding problem, history of change in activity, being agitated, the presence of lower chest wall indrawing, respiratory rate >60 breaths/min, grunting, cyanosis, a history of convulsions, a bulging fontanel and slow digital capillary refill were independent predictors of severe disease. The presence of any 1 of these 14 signs had a sensitivity for severe disease (defined as sepsis, meningitis, hypoxemia, or radiologically proven pneumonia) of 87% and a specificity of 54%. More stringent combinations, such as demanding 2 signs from the list, resulted in a considerable loss of sensitivity. By contrast only slight loss of sensitivity and considerable gain of specificity resulted from reducing the list to 9 signs. Requiring the presence of fever and any other sign produced a diagnostic rule with extremely low sensitivity (25%)., Conclusions: Physical signs can be used to identify young infants at risk of severe disease, however with limited specificity, resulting in large numbers of unnecessary referrals. Further studies are required to validate and refine the prediction of severe disease, especially in the first week of life, but there appear to be limits on the accuracy of prediction that is achievable.

Background: The broad antimicrobial spectrum and affordable price of chloramphenicol make it an attractive first line treatment option for children with severe illnesses in developing countries. Little is known, however, about its pharmacokinetics in young infants in these settings., Methods: We studied infants younger than 3 months of age hospitalized in Manila, Philippines and The Gambia with possible severe bacterial infections likely to benefit from treatment with chloramphenicol. Infants in the first week of life received intramuscular doses of 25 mg/kg chloramphenicol once daily, twice daily in the second through fourth week of life and three times daily from 5 to 12 weeks of age. Blood samples were taken at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 h after the first dose, 1 h before the second dose and before the repetition doses on subsequent days. In the Philippines a second group of infants was treated with oral chloramphenicol according to the same dosage schedule., Results: Thirty-eight infants received intramuscular chloramphenicol, and 20 received oral drug. Intramuscular administration resulted in therapeutic concentrations (10 to 25 microg/ml) in 73 to 86% of children in each of the three age groups in the first 6 h and in 50 to 80% on Days 2 and 3. Between 33 and 38% of children had potentially toxic values on Days 2 and 3. In contrast, after oral administration, only about one-half of the children reached therapeutic values in serum at any time up to Day 3 after start of treatment., Conclusions: Intramuscular chloramphenicol can be used as a second line drug for the treatment of severe infections in infants younger than 90 days of age, where third generation cephalosporins are not available. It quickly achieves therapeutic values in a high proportion of children. However, severe infections should not be treated with oral chloramphenicol in this age group, because therapeutic serum concentrations were inconsistently achieved.

The World Health Organization recommends the use of raised respiratory rate and chest wall indrawing to enable health workers in developing countries to diagnose pneumonia. We evaluated the current World Health Organization guidelines for management of the child with cough or difficult breathing in Manila, Philippines and Mbabane, Swaziland using an identical protocol in both countries. Raised respiratory rate was defined as greater than or equal to 50/minute for children ages 2 to 12 months and greater than or equal to 40/minute for children 12 months to 5 years. Chest wall indrawing was defined as inward movement of the bony structures of the lower chest wall with inspiration. In the Philippines raised respiratory rate or chest wall indrawing, when applied by a pediatrician, was found to have a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.77 for predicting pneumonia as determined by a pediatrician with the aid of a chest roentgenogram. In Swaziland the sensitivity was 0.77 and the specificity was 0.80. When applied by health workers the sensitivity was similar but the specificity was lower. The current World Health Organization ARI case management guidelines predicted pneumonia with similar sensitivity and specificity in two very different developing countries, the Philippines and Swaziland.