1. Customized disposable kit versus a conventional stainless steel instrument for an intravitreal injection: A comparison.
- Author
-
Khaqan HA, Imtiaz U, Malik IQ, and Qureshi BZ
- Subjects
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Disposable Equipment, Equipment Design methods, Female, Humans, Male, Materials Testing methods, Middle Aged, Ophthalmology methods, Ophthalmology trends, Pain Measurement methods, Pain Measurement statistics & numerical data, Pakistan, Intravitreal Injections adverse effects, Intravitreal Injections instrumentation, Intravitreal Injections methods, Pain, Procedural diagnosis, Pain, Procedural etiology, Pain, Procedural prevention & control, Surgical Instruments adverse effects, Surgical Instruments standards
- Abstract
Comparison of a customized disposable kit with a conventional stainless steel instrument was performed for an intravitreal injection. A total of 2700 eyes of 2250 patients were enrolled in two groups. Comfort level of the patients was assessed using a 'Pain Scale' and any post intravitreal injection complications were examined clinically by a slit lamp biomicroscopy. Surgeon's ease was assessed by a questionnaire. In group A, no pain was recorded in 1231(82.06%) eyes, mild pain was d escribed in 184(12.27%), moderate pain was documented in 78 (5.2%) while, severe pain was noticed in 7(0.47%). In group B, no pain was seen in 1014(84.5%), mild pain was present in 123(10.25%), moderate pain was perceived in 58 (4.83%) while, severe pain was recorded in 5 (0.42%). With respect to surgeon's ease, 6 out of the 7 surgeons found the kit to be more convenient and cost effective as compared to the conventional instruments. Disposable intravitreal kit is beneficial for both the patients as well as the surgeons.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF