Search

Objective: The study objective was to characterize subgroups of Asia‐Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes who achieved different glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets on tirzepatide treatment. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the SURPASS AP‐Combo study. Baseline characteristics, changes in metabolic markers, and safety were compared between tirzepatide‐treated patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) and those achieving ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) at week 40. Among patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol), further comparisons were conducted among subgroups achieving HbA1c <5.7% (<39 mmol/mol), 5.7% to 6.5% (39 to 48 mmol/mol), and >6.5% to <7.0% (>48 to <53 mmol/mol). Results: Five hundred ninety‐eight patients on tirzepatide treatment without rescue medication were included (56.9% male; mean age: 53.1 years; mean baseline HbA1c: 8.7% [71.6 mmol/mol]). Patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) versus ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) were slightly younger with a shorter disease duration and lower HbA1c at baseline, and they had greater improvements in HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist‐height ratio, diastolic blood pressure, lipids, and self‐monitored blood glucose at week 40. Patients achieving HbA1c <5.7% (<39 mmol/mol) versus those achieving 5.7% to 6.5% (39 to 48 mmol/mol) and those achieving >6.5% to <7.0% (>48 to <53 mmol/mol) were much younger, had much lower HbA1c, and had further improvements in metabolic markers. Tirzepatide treatment was well tolerated irrespective of the HbA1c level achieved, with a low incidence of hypoglycemic events. Conclusions: These findings may help to inform clinical decisions in Asia‐Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tirzepatide is a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. In the SURPASS-AP-Combo trial, once-weekly tirzepatide was associated with improved glycemic control and weight loss versus insulin glargine and was generally well tolerated in an Asia-Pacific, predominately Chinese, population with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This post hoc subgroup analysis of SURPASS-AP-Combo assessed the potential influence of patient baseline characteristics on the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide. Methods: Changes from baseline to week 40 in HbA1c, body weight, fasting serum glucose (FSG), and daily glucose average from self-measured blood glucose profiles were analyzed by potential influential factors including age (< 65, ≥ 65 years), sex, baseline HbA1c (≤ 8.5, > 8.5%), body mass index (BMI) (< 25, ≥ 25 kg/m2), body weight (< 75, ≥ 75 kg), duration of diabetes (< 10, ≥ 10 years), and concomitant oral antihyperglycemic medications (metformin, metformin plus sulphonylurea). Gastrointestinal adverse events and hypoglycemia were also evaluated. Results: At week 40, all tirzepatide doses were associated with reduced HbA1c, body weight, FSG, and daily glucose average from baseline in all subgroups. Greater HbA1c reductions were achieved in patients with higher baseline HbA1c across all tirzepatide doses, higher body weight with 10 mg and younger age with 15 mg tirzepatide. Greater reductions in body weight were observed in patients with higher body weight across all tirzepatide doses, lower baseline HbA1c with 5 mg and higher BMI with 5 mg tirzepatide. Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide was associated with reduced blood glucose and body weight in a predominantly Chinese population with T2D across different subgroups, consistent with previous reports for tirzepatide. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04093752. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to provide recommendations regarding effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins (glargine U‐300, degludec U‐100, glargine U‐100, detemir, and insulin protamine Hagedorn) in insulin‐naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes in the Asia‐Pacific region. Based on evidence from a systematic review, we developed an Asia‐Pacific clinical practice guideline through comprehensive internal review and external review processes. We set up and used clinical thresholds of trivial, small, moderate, and large effects for different critical and important outcomes in the overall certainty of evidence assessment and balancing the magnitude of intervention effects when making recommendations, following GRADE methods (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). The AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation) and RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) guideline reporting checklists were complied with. After the second‐round vote by the working group members, all the recommendations and qualifying statements reached over 75% agreement rates. Among 44 contacted external reviewers, we received 33 clinicians' and one patient's comments. The overall response rate was 77%. To solve the four research questions, we made two strong recommendations, six conditional recommendations, and two qualifying statements. Although the intended users of this guideline focused on clinicians in the Asia‐Pacific region, the eligible evidence was based on recent English publications. We believe that the recommendations and the clinical thresholds set up in the guideline can be references for clinicians who take care of patients with type 2 diabetes worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]