Search

Purpose: The Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario (POGO) supported an effort to implement infection management care pathways based on clinical practice guidelines, to improve the consistency of infection management in pediatric cancer patients. The objective of this qualitative study was to describe the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) following implementation., Methods: Four tertiary pediatric oncology centers in Ontario, Canada, implemented the pathways. We randomly identified three HCPs per group (clinical pharmacists; nurse case managers, educators or practitioners and physician assistants; pediatric oncology fellows; or pediatric oncology staff physicians) per site and invited them to participate in a qualitative interview. One-on-one interviews were conducted remotely, followed by thematic analysis of interview transcripts., Results: A total of 66 invitations were extended and 42 HCPs participated. Identified themes were: (1) implementation approach, (2) access and navigation, (3) engagement, (4) concerns, (5) workplace benefits, (6) reception, and (7) provincial harmonization. HCPs preferred in-person implementation strategies over e-mail communication. They identified teaching/educational utility and benefits to non-oncology departments and non-tertiary centers participating in shared care of patients. Other positive aspects related to evidence-based practice, safety, supporting oncology HCPs, and benefits to patients and families. Concerns included need to ensure users applied clinical judgement and loss of autonomy. Provincial harmonization of practice was viewed positively, although potential logistical and institutional cultural barriers were raised., Conclusions: Following infection management care pathway implementation, HCPs described educational utility and benefits to non-oncology departments, oncology HCPs, patients, and families. Our findings may facilitate future infection management care pathway provincial harmonization., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: We described previously the development of a set of quality indicators (QIs) of a childhood cancer system in Ontario, Canada. The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptability of the proposed set of QIs among stakeholders of the childhood cancer system., Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to assess stakeholder agreement on the value of the proposed QIs. A QI evaluation survey was mailed to a stakeholder group of 23 multidisciplinary health care providers, survivors, parents, and policymakers who rated each QI on specific criteria. Prior to an in-person consensus meeting, the distribution of scores was provided to panel members. At the meeting, QIs were reevaluated and discussed in three successive rounds. QIs with 80% or more of panel agreement were considered endorsed., Results: Overall, 20 QIs were endorsed by the panel, measuring all seven quality dimensions of Ontario's Cancer System Quality Index framework. Five QIs were endorsed by 100% of the panel as follows: Five-year event-free survival, chemotherapy admission delay, drug availability, sufficient multidisciplinary staff, and parent satisfaction. Although none of the QIs relating to end-of-life or Satellite care were endorsed, panel members emphasized the need to measure these components of the system., Conclusions: Standardized implementation of the 20 pediatric cancer QIs endorsed by the multidisciplinary stakeholder panel will provide ongoing monitoring of various dimensions of system quality and the development of benchmarks over time, greatly augmenting the ability to identify needed system improvements across populations and jurisdictions., (Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)