Search

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over time in Ontario, Canada., Methods: We performed a population-based study of Ontario health administrative data, using validated case definitions for psoriasis and PsA. We computed the crude and age- and sex-standardized cumulative prevalence and incidence of psoriasis from 2000 to 2015., Results: Among the 10,774,802 individuals ages ≥20 years residing in Ontario in 2015, we identified 273,238 patients with psoriasis and 18,655 patients with PsA, equating to cumulative prevalence estimates of 2.54% and 0.17%, respectively. Correcting the prevalence estimates for imperfect sensitivity and specificity resulted in similar estimates. The male:female ratio was approximately 1.0 for both conditions. For psoriasis, the age- and sex-standardized cumulative prevalence increased from 1.74% in 2000 to 2.32% in 2015. For PsA, the age- and sex-standardized cumulative prevalence increased from 0.09% in 2008 to 0.15% in 2015. Between 2008 and 2015, annual incidence rates for psoriasis decreased, whereas those for PsA remained relatively stable., Conclusion: The prevalence and incidence of psoriasis and PsA in Ontario are similar to those observed in Europe and the US. The steady increase in the prevalence of psoriasis and PsA over the past decade may be due to a combination of population aging, population growth, and increasing life expectancy., (© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To estimate the incidence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis, and to identify risk factors for its development., Methods: The study was designed as a prospective cohort study involving psoriasis patients who did not have a diagnosis of arthritis at the time of study enrollment. Information was collected about lifestyle habits, comorbidities, psoriasis activity, and medications. Patients who developed inflammatory arthritis or spondylitis were classified as having PsA if they fulfilled the criteria of the Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis Study group. The annual incidence of PsA was estimated using an event per person-years analysis. Cox proportional hazards models, involving fixed and time-dependent explanatory variables, were fitted to obtain estimates of the relative risk (RR) of the onset of PsA, determined in multivariate models stratified by sex and controlled for age at onset of psoriasis., Results: The data obtained from the 464 patients who were followed up for 8 years were analyzed. A total of 51 patients developed PsA during the 8 years since enrollment. The annual incidence rate of PsA was 2.7 cases (95% confidence interval 2.1-3.6) per 100 psoriasis patients. The following baseline variables were associated with the development of PsA in multivariate analysis: severe psoriasis (RR 5.4, P = 0.006), low level of education (university/college versus high school incomplete RR 0.22, P = 0.005; high school graduate versus high school incomplete RR 0.30, P = 0.049), and use of retinoid medications (RR 3.4, P = 0.02). In multivariate models with time-dependent variables, psoriatic nail pitting (RR 2.5, P = 0.002) and uveitis (RR 31.5, P = 0.0002) were associated with the development of PsA., Conclusion: The incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis is higher than previously reported. A severe psoriasis phenotype, presence of nail pitting, low level of education, and uveitis are predictive of the development of PsA in patients with psoriasis., (© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.)

Purpose: Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may be more effective than unfractionated heparin but also more likely to bioaccumulate and potentially cause bleeding in patients with renal insufficiency. The objectives of this study were to assess, among medical-surgical patients in the intensive care unit receiving dalteparin 5,000 IU daily for thromboprophylaxis, (1) the relationship between renal dysfunction and LMWH bioaccumulation as measured by trough anti-Xa levels, (2) the relationship between renal dysfunction and risk of bleeding as measured by a surrogate marker (peak anti-Xa levels), and (3) the relationship between anti-Xa levels, bleeding events, and thrombotic events., Materials and Methods: In this prospective single-center cohort study, we enrolled patients 18 years or older, expected to stay 72 hours or longer, and with a creatinine clearance 30 mL/min or higher at intensive care unit admission. We administered 5,000 IU dalteparin subcutaneously each day. The main phase 1 objective was to detect bioaccumulation of dalteparin by measuring trough anti-Xa levels (22-23 hours post dalteparin). The main phase 2 objective was to examine the relationship between renal dysfunction and peak anti-Xa levels (4 hours post dalteparin). We recorded creatinine clearance daily and bleeding and thrombotic events, blinded to anti-Xa levels., Results: We enrolled 19 patients aged 62.7 (13.2) years with an APACHE II score of 23.5 (9.4). We measured trough anti-Xa levels on 185 occasions in 19 patients; we measured peak anti-Xa levels on 113 occasions in 11 patients. We identified no bioaccumulation of LMWH in this study, as detected by trough anti-Xa levels. Most peak anti-Xa levels were in the conventional prophylactic range., Conclusions: When administered in prophylactic doses to critically ill patients with a wide range of calculated creatinine clearances, we found no evidence of bioaccumulation of dalteparin. If dalteparin does not bioaccumulate, it may be an attractive alternative agent for thromboprophylaxis.