Search

Background: Test-retest reproducibility is of utmost importance in follow-up of right ventricular (RV) volumes and function; optimal slice orientation though is not yet known. We compared test-retest reproducibility and intra-/inter-observer variability of right ventricular (RV) volumes and function assessed with short-axis and transverse cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods: Eighteen volunteers underwent cine CMR for RV assessment obtaining ventricular coverage in short-axis and transverse slice orientation. Additional 2D phase contrast flow imaging of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) was performed. After complete repositioning repeat acquisitions were performed. Data sets were contoured by two blinded observers. Statistical analysis included Student's t-test, Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and 2-way ANOVA, SEM and minimal detectable difference calculations. Results: Heart rates (65.0 ± 7.4 vs. 67.6 ± 9.9 bpm; P = 0.1) and MPA flow (89.8 ± 16.6 vs. 87.2 ± 14.9 mL; P = 0.1) did not differ between imaging sessions. EDV and ESV demonstrated an inter-study bias of 0.4 %[-9.5 %,10.3 %] and 2. 1% [-12.3 %,16.4 %] for short-axis and 1.1 %[-7.3 %,9.4 %] and 0.8 %[-16.0 %,17.6 %] for transverse orientation, respectively. There was no significant interaction between imaging orientation and interstudy reproducibility (p =0 . 395-0.824), intra-observer variability (p =0 . 7 2 6-0.862) or inter-observer variability (p =0 . 4 4 7-0.706) by 2-way ANOVA. Inter-observer agreement by ICC was greater for short axis versus transverse orientation for all parameters (0.769-0.986 vs. 0.625-0.983, respectively). Minimal detectable differences for short axis and transverse orientations were 10.1 mL/11. 5 mL for EDV, 8.3 mL/8.4 mL for ESV and 4.1 % vs. 4.7 % for EF, respectively. Conclusion: Short-axis and transverse orientation both provide reliable and reproducible measures for follow-up of RV volumes and global function. Therefore, additional transverse SSFP cine CMR may not necessarily be required if performed for the sole purpose of quantitative volumetric RV assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is an independent predictor of death and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with various cardiac conditions. Purpose To investigate whether RVEF, measured with cardiac MRI, is a predictor of appropriate shock or death in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Materials and Methods This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients who underwent cardiac MRI before ICD implantation between January 2007 and May 2017. Right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RVEF were measured with cardiac MRI. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or appropriate ICD shock. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. The association between RVEF and primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated by using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Potential interactions were tested between primary prevention, ischemic cause, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and RVEF. Results Among 411 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 60 years; 315 men) during a median follow-up of 63 months, 143 (35%) patients experienced an appropriate ICD shock or died. In univariable analysis, lower RVEF was associated with greater risks for appropriate ICD shock or death and for death alone (log-rank trend test, P = .003 and .005 respectively). In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for age at ICD implantation, LVEF, ICD indication (primary vs secondary), ischemic heart disease, and late gadolinium enhancement, RVEF was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 per 10% lower RVEF; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.41; P = .01) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.25 per 10% lower RVEF; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.55; P = .04). No evidence of significant interactions was found between RVEF and primary or secondary prevention ( P = .49), ischemic heart disease ( P = .78), and LVEF ( P = .29). Conclusion Right ventricular ejection fraction measured with cardiac MRI was a predictor of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock or death. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Nazarian and Zghaib in this issue. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on August 24, 2021.

Aim: Intensified haemodialysis is associated with regression of left ventricular (LV) mass. Compared to LV ejection fraction, LV strain allows more direct assessment of LV function. We sought to assess the impact of in-centre nocturnal haemodialysis (INHD) on global LV strain (radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) and torsion by cardiac MRI (CMR)., Methods: In this prospective, two-centre cohort study, 37 participants on conventional haemodialysis (CHD, 3-4 h/session for three sessions/week) converted to INHD (7-8 h/session for three sessions/week) and 30 participants continued CHD. Participants underwent CMR using a standardized protocol and had biomarker measurements at baseline and 52 weeks., Results: Among the 55 participants (mean age 55; 40% women) with complete CMR data, those who converted to INHD had a significant improvement in their global circumferential strain (GCS, P = 0.025), while those continuing CHD did not have any significant changes in LV strain. When the two groups were compared, there was significant improvement in torsion. LV strains were significantly correlated with each other, but not with troponin I, C-reactive protein, or brain natriuretic protein (NT-proBNP), except for global longitudinal strain (GLS) with troponin I (P = 0.001) and NT-proBNP (P = 0.038)., Conclusion: Conversion to INHD was associated with significant improvement in GCS over one year of study, although comparisons with the CHD group were not significant. There was also a significant decrease in torsion in the INHD group compared with CHD. Improvement in LV regional function would support the notion that INHD has favourable effects on both LV structure and function., (© 2018 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Objectives: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold-standard test for the assessment of heart function. Despite its importance, many jurisdictions lack specific billing codes that can be used to identify patient receipt of CMR in administrative databases, limiting the ability to perform 'big data' CMR studies. Our objective was to identify the optimal billing code combination to identify patients who underwent CMR using administrative data in Ontario., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Quaternary care academic referral centre in Ontario, Canada., Participants: We tested all billing code combinations in order to identify the optimal one to determine receipt of CMR. The reference gold standard was a list of all cardiothoracic magnetic resonance scans performed at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016, verified by chart audit. We assessed the diagnostic performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) for all code combinations., Results: Our gold-standard cohort consisted of 2339 thoracic MRIs that were performed at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016. Of these, 2139 (91.5%) were CMRs and 200 (8.5%) were chest MRIs. We identified the most accurate billing combination for the determination of patient receipt of CMR. This combination resulted in an accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI 94.4% to 96.2%), sensitivity of 97.4% (95% CI 96.6% to 98.1%), specificity of 86.4% (95% CI 83.1% to 89.6%), positive predictive value of 96.9% (95% CI 96.1% to 97.6%) and negative predictive value of 88.4% (95% CI 85.4% to 91.5%)., Conclusions: Our study is the first to verify the ability to accurately identify patient receipt of CMR using administrative data, facilitating more robust population-based CMR studies in the future., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is a clinically useful tool for detection of clinically significant myocardial ischaemia in adults. We report our 5-year retrospective experience with perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a large, quarternary adult congenital heart disease centre., Methods: We reviewed all cases of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients referred from the adult congenital heart disease service. Dipyridamole stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance was undertaken on commercially available 1.5 and 3 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance scanners. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging was performed 8-10 minutes after completion of the rest perfusion sequence. Navigator whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography was also performed where feasible. RESULTS of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance were correlated with complementary imaging studies, surgery, and clinical outcomes., Results: Over 5 years, we performed 34 stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations (11 positive). In all, 84% of patients had further investigations for ischaemia in addition to cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Within a subgroup of 19 patients who had definitive alternative assessment of their coronary arteries, stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 100%. Of the 34 studies, two were false negatives, in which the aetiology of ischaemia was extrinsic arterial compression rather than intrinsic coronary luminal narrowing. Coronary abnormalities were identified in 71% of cases who had coronary magnetic resonance angiography., Conclusion: Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance is a useful and accurate tool for investigation of myocardial ischaemia in an adult congenital heart disease population with suspected non-atherosclerotic coronary abnormalities.

Background: For the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, guidelines provide left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) criteria for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement without specifying the technique by which it should be measured. We sought to investigate the potential impact of performing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for EF on ICD eligibility., Methods: The study population consisted of patients being considered for ICD implantation who were referred for EF assessment by CMR. Patients who underwent CMR within 30 days of echocardiography were included. Echocardiographic EF was determined by Simpson's biplane method and CMR EF was measured by Simpson's summation of discs method., Results: Fifty-two patients (age 62±15 years, 81% male) had a mean EF of 38 ± 14% by echocardiography and 35 ± 14% by CMR. CMR had greater reproducibility than echocardiography for both intra-observer (ICC, 0.98 vs 0.94) and inter-observer comparisons (ICC 0.99 vs 0.93). The limits of agreement comparing CMR and echocardiographic EF were - 16 to +10 percentage points. CMR resulted in 11 of 52 (21%) and 5 of 52 (10%) of patients being reclassified regarding ICD eligibility at the EF thresholds of 35 and 30% respectively. Among patients with an echocardiographic EF of between 25 and 40%, 9 of 22 (41%) were reclassified by CMR at either the 35 or 30% threshold. Echocardiography identified only 1 of the 6 patients with left ventricular thrombus noted incidentally on CMR., Conclusions: CMR resulted in 21% of patients being reclassified regarding ICD eligibility when strict EF criteria were used. In addition, CMR detected unexpected left ventricular thrombus in almost 10% of patients. Our findings suggest that the use of CMR for EF assessment may have a substantial impact on management in patients being considered for ICD implantation.