Search

Purpose: To explore health care providers' (HCP) experiences related to transitions in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community for patients with limb loss. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Participants were eligible if they were HCPs currently working in amputation rehabilitation at a rehabilitation hospital in Ontario, Canada, with at least 1-year experience in this setting, and could speak and understand English. Data were analyzed thematically using the six-step process of the DEPICT model dynamic reading, engaged codebook development, participatory coding, inclusive reviewing and summarizing of categories, collaborative analyzing and translating. Results: Fourteen HCPs from a variety of health care professions participated in this study. Five key themes describe participants' perspectives on the factors impacting patients' transition in care following limb loss. Specifically, participants emphasized patient preparedness, HCP follow-up, finances and funding, patient self-management skills, and psychosocial support as factors that could influence the transition in care. Conclusion: This study identified challenges to transitions in care for people with limb loss. Future research is needed to evaluate solutions to address these challenges in transitions in care. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Suboptimal transitions in care can result in readmission to the hospital, emergency department visits, and increased health care costs. Patient preparedness, follow-up, finances and funding, patient self-management skills, and psychosocial support are perceived to influence transitions in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community. Improved access to follow-up and supports in the community and improved communication across the continuum of care could improve transitions for people with limb loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long surgical wait times have long plagued health systems in Canada and abroad. This backlog and associated strain on health human resources has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, affecting surgeries of varying degrees of urgency across all surgical specialties, including head and neck surgery. Single-entry models (SEMs) are being increasingly studied as one possible strategy to help manage surgical wait times, and a growing number of health systems have implemented SEMs within departments such as otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. We sought to evaluate the views of head and neck surgeons at all 8 designated head and neck cancer centers across Ontario on the role of SEMs in managing surgical backlogs. Results: We interviewed 10 Ontario head and neck surgeons on the role of SEMs in managing wait times within the field. The following themes were elicited from interview transcripts: (1) anticipated positive impact, (2) barriers to implementation, (3) patient experience, and (4) roadmap to implementation. Participants agreed that SEMs may have utility for certain types of surgeries if implemented to address local needs. They also believe this model would have the greatest impact if employed together with other approaches, such as increasing operating room time or nursing availability. Conclusion: Our results highlighted the necessity for a nuanced approach to single-entry model implementation in head and neck surgery. While participants recognized the utility of SEMs for high-volume and low-variation surgeries, participants remained divided on the optimal approach to triaging patients necessitating more complex oncologic treatments. Deliberate collaboration among stakeholder organizations and senior surgeons will be critical if SEMs are to succeed in an intricate and political healthcare environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional education (IPE) is prioritized as a critical component in preparing pre-licensure health professional students for effective teamwork and collaboration in the workplace to facilitate patient-centered care. Knowledge in anatomy is fundamental for healthcare professionals, making interprofessional anatomy education an attractive intervention for IPE and anatomy learning. Since 2009, the Education Program in Anatomy at McMaster University has offered an intensive 10-week IPE Anatomy Dissection elective to seven health professional programs annually. From 2011, students were invited to complete the Readiness for Interprofessional Scale (RIPLS) and Interprofessional Education Perception Scale (IEPS) before and after the elective. A total of 264 students from 2011 to 2020 completed RIPLS and IEPS. There were significant differences before and after the elective in students' total RIPLS scores and three of the four subscales: teamwork and collaboration, positive professional identity, and roles and responsibilities. Similarly, there were statistical differences in the total IEPS scores and two of three subscales: competency and autonomy and perceived actual cooperation. Statistically significant differences in RIPLS and IEPS total scores across several disciplines were also observed. This study demonstrates the elective's impact in improving students' IPE perceptions and attitudes, likely from the extended learning and exposure opportunity with other disciplines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional collaboration in palliative care is essential to ensuring high-quality care for seriously ill patients. Education interventions to increase competency in palliative care should incorporate team-building skills to encourage an interprofessional approach. We developed and piloted a virtual educational program named CAPACITI for interprofessional teams to promote a community palliative approach to care. Primary care teams from across Ontario, Canada, participated in CAPACITI which consisted of 10 facilitated sessions that emphasized how to operationalize a palliative care approach as a team. Pre- and post-study questionnaires were completed by each team, including the AITCS-II, a validated instrument that measures interprofessional collaboration. We analyzed individual paired differences in summary scores and in each of three subdomains of the AITCS-II questionnaire: partnership, cooperation, and coordination. Seventeen teams completed the AITCS-II post survey, representing 133 participants. Teams varied demographically and ranged from 5 to 16 members. After CAPACITI, the overall mean AITCS-II summary score among teams increased to 96.0 (SD = 10.0) for a significant paired mean difference increase of 9.4 (p =.03). There were also significant increases in the partnership (p =.01) and in the cooperation subdomains (p =.04). CAPACITI demonstrated the potential for improving collaboration among primary care teams, which can lead to improved provider and patient outcomes in palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and aims: This study examined critical care nurses', physicians', and allied health professionals' perceptions of factors that support, inhibit, or limit the use of sedation interruption (SI) to improve the use of this integral component of care for mechanically ventilated patients. Method: We conducted a theory-based, descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with critical care registered nurses, respiratory therapists, a pharmacist, and a physician in a hospital in Ontario, Canada. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Weidentified 9 facilitators and 20 barriers to SI use by nurses. Facilitators included the innovation (importance of protocols) and potential adopters (comfort with the skill). The barriers were the potential adopters' (nurses) knowledge gaps regarding the performance and goal of SI and the practice environment (lack of time, availability of extra staff, and lack of multidisciplinary rounds). Conclusion: This study identified facilitators and barriers to SI for mechanically ventilated patients. Implementation efforts must address barriers associated with nurses, the environment, and contextual factors. A team-based approach is essential, as the absence of interprofessional rounds is a significant barrier to the appropriate use or non-use of SI. Future research can focus on the indications, contraindications, and goals of SI, emphasizing a shared appreciation for these factors across disciplines. Nursing capacity to manage a patient waking up from sedation is necessary for point-of-care adherence; future research should focus on the best ways to do so. Implementation study designs should use theory and evidence-based determinants of SI to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives Healthcare services are rarely designed to meet the needs of Indigenous people, resulting in culturally unsafe care and assessment tools. This paper describes a collaboration between North East Behavioural Supports Ontario (NEBSO), university researchers, and Indigenous communities to adapt a biographical assessment tool used by NEBSO to be culturally appropriate and safe for Indigenous older adults (55+) in long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada. Research Design and Methods Over 36 months, this project applied an Indigenized, community-based participatory research (CBPR) and cultural safety framework to the adaptation process. Qualitative data sources include the guidance of an Indigenous Elder, an Anishinaabe Language Expert Group, and focus groups conducted along the North Shore of Lake Huron, Sudbury, and Cochrane, Ontario. Results The adapted tool shifts the focus from personhood to relationships, includes culturally relevant domains, and supports trauma-informed approaches. Five themes were identified during the adaptation process: (1) practicing a relational approach to care, (2) valuing Indigenous language, (3) understanding Indigenous trauma, (4) respecting cultural values and understandings, and (5) addressing systemic barriers to culturally safe care. Discussion and Implications Themes elucidated from this research process can inform future studies adapting mainstream practice tools and developing new tools for Indigenous populations. The collaboration and approach to this adaptation process demonstrated how cultural safety at systemic and practice levels can be addressed through CPBR partnerships between universities, organizations, and Indigenous communities. Findings support the need to evaluate the cultural safety of other assessments for older Indigenous adults in health care settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: At our institution's cancer palliative care (PC) clinic, new referrals from oncologists were scheduled for consultation and ongoing follow-up by PC physicians without input from the patients' family physicians (FPs). FPs reported that they felt out of the loop. We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed at systematically facilitating care coordination between FPs and PC physicians. METHODS: A coordination toolkit was sent from the PC physician to the FP whenever the PC physician received a consultation request from an oncologist. The toolkit included an introduction to the PC physician team; an opportunity for the FP to choose how best to collaborate with PC physicians to meet the patient's PC needs; and contact information for access to 24/7 PC physician support. Responses from FPs regarding their preferred level of engagement with PC determined further care planning in the clinic. We measured feasibility, response rate, and qualitative surveys of FPs about the usefulness of the intervention. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen new consultations were eligible for a standardized letter over the 6-month implementation period. Feasibility for sending the toolkit was 90.0% and response rate for collaborative care preference from FPs was 86.0%, with median response time of 3-4 days. 78.9% of FPs indicated they would prefer ongoing consultative care by the PC physician, while 18.6% indicated that PC physician consultation was not needed, or that the FP would provide primary PC after a one-time PC physician consultation. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented a QI initiative to improve care coordination between FPs and PC physicians for patients with cancer. The coordination toolkit can protect the patient-FP primary PC relationship and optimize specialist PC resource utilization for complex patients. This QI initiative used a standardized toolkit to improve care coordination for patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Older people admitted to hospital are highly susceptible to functional decline and related complications. Care supporting their functioning is complex and requires healthcare professionals working in concert, with nurses playing a central role. Yet, little is known about nurses' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in care supporting functioning in acutely admitted older people. To fill this knowledge gap, we elucidate the perspectives of nurses in Ontario, Canada, on IPC in care supporting older people's functioning during a hospital stay. Methods: We employed a qualitative methodology in conjunction with a qualitative descriptive design. Thirteen focus groups were held with a purposeful, criterion‐based sample of 57 acute care nurses practising in a range of acute care settings (e.g. Emergency, General Medicine, General Surgery, Intensive Care, Coronary Care). Data were thematically analysed. Results: We identified two overarching themes: (1) IPC is improving, but nurses are excluded from decision‐making and (2) nurse advocacy causes friction with other professionals. The first theme captures nurses' perception that IPC in older people's care is improving, but nurses are marginalised in interprofessional decision‐making. As a result, nurses perceive that their knowledge is devalued, and their contributions to care supporting older people's functioning are undermined. The second theme underlines a tension between interprofessional team practices and patient‐ and family‐centred care, while also demonstrating nurses' increasing willingness to act as patient and family advocates. Conclusions: Findings can be used to enhance IPC in care supporting the functioning of acutely hospitalised older people. To improve IPC, clinical and administrative leaders should cultivate more egalitarian team relationships that encourage nurses to contribute to decision‐making and advocate on behalf of older patients and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supportive housing programs such as the Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) that provide combined formal (off-site healthcare providers) and informal (on-site supports are effective in reducing erratic housing and homelessness. This study explored the views of the Community Mental Health Agency staff on their experiences with the CHO and related changes for further improvement of the program. We applied focused ethnographic techniques to recruit 47 agency staff from 28 group homes in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Focus group discussions were conducted at two-time points (baseline–spring 2018 and post-implementation – winter 2019). Data analysis guided by Leininger's ethnographic qualitative analysis techniques produced three main themes and 11 subthemes themes. The main themes include facilitators of CHO, challenges to the CHO implementation, and strategies for improving the CHO program. Overall, supportive housing models have been found to constitute an effective pathway to reducing precarious housing and ending chronic homelessness for those in need while enhancing their social integration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Residents in long-term care homes (LTCHs) are often diagnosed with chronic, life-limiting illnesses, and it is now a common site to provide high levels of care and eventual death. There is an urgent need to address communication gaps and uncertainties surrounding resident's end of life preferences. Nurses are well situated to be key facilitators of necessary advance care planning (ACP), ensuring residents have discussions with family, substitute decision-makers and healthcare providers regarding future health and personal care preferences. However, LTCHs present unique challenges for nurses due to not only complex comorbidities but also staffing dynamics. Purpose: This study explored the experiences and perceptions of Registered Nurses (RNs) and Registered Practical Nurse (RPNs) in LTCHs regarding their role in engaging residents and families in ACP discussions. Methods: Qualitative interpretive descriptive methodology was used. Data were collected from two LTCHs in Southern Ontario with a sample of 15 nurses (7 RNs and 8 RPNs). Analysis involved review of semistructured interviews, field notes, and utilizing constant comparison within an inductive approach. Results: Power and authority dynamics in LTCH's was an overarching theme in the data, with four subthemes: (1) Nurses lacking clarity about ACP, (2) nurses' uncertainty regarding their role in ACP, (3) nurses feeling uncomfortable engaging in ACP discussions, and (4) nurses struggling to support families in ACP discussions. Conclusion: Recommendations for nurses, healthcare providers, LTCH administrators, and policy makers include: (1) development of policies which support, from a systemic level, nurses to feel safe while engaging in ACP; (2) reassessing LTCH's hierarchical structure, and clarifying RN, RPN, and interdisciplinary team members roles in ACP; (3) developing culture change that allows a team and person-centered approach to ACP; and (4) providing ongoing education and mentorship for nurses to manage family dynamics and expand their understanding of ACP beyond a biomedical lens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Mental health and substance use services for youth in Canada continue to be fragmented. In response, Integrated Youth Services (IYS) has been proposed to address gaps in youth mental health services that can lead to improved youth outcomes. Youth Wellness Hubs Ontario (YWHO) was launched in 2017 as Ontario's IYS Network for youth ages 12–25, prioritizing continuous improvement through evaluation. Description: At the end of the first three years of the YWHO initiative, an evaluation was carried out to identify the barriers and facilitators to the initial implementation of YWHO and service delivery modifications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic across ten sites. Reporting on these is the focus of this article. Key informant interviews were conducted in early 2021 with Network Leads from all ten initial YWHO sites. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze all interview data. Discussion: Facilitators to the implementation of the YWHO model included diversified funding models, YWHO Provincial Office implementation supports, clear hub processes, robust community partnerships, organizational support and dedicated staff. Common barriers included certain challenges related to staffing and finances, implementation of the shared data collection platform, implementation of measurement-based care, partnerships, integrated service delivery, and branding and communications. Conclusion: Implementation of IYS is highly collaborative and quite complex. As interest in such models increase, so does the need for knowledge related to optimal implementation. Learnings have informed developments and improvements made to the YWHO model. Insights will also inform how stakeholders support youth in their communities in designing and implementing services that improve youth mental health and overall well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Volunteers are foundational in hospice programs. The purpose of this research was to address social, ethnic and demographic changes in Southwestern Ontario and understand how this may affect volunteer recruitment, and representation. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with hospice volunteers, key informants from leaders in ethnocultural communities, and hospice staff. Qualitative data from the interviews was analyzed using thematic analysis in five phases. Findings suggest ethnocultural interpretations of hospice can be very different than Westernized, Eurocentric ideas around end-of-life care. Systemic and structural barriers, information sharing, volunteer motivation and representation were found to influence and impact ethnocultural volunteer recruitment in hospice palliative care. Using a critical analysis allows us to identify the "imposition" of a Euro-ethnocentric hospice palliative care model that prevents recruitment of and impedes access of ethnocultural groups to hospice palliative care. To build bridges across predominantly White/Western models of care to ethnocultural racialized communities requires constant communication, relationship building, and determination in mutuality of learning on behalf of the dominant model. This research has implications for different regions of Canada providing hospice palliative care and hoping to increase ethnocultural accessibility and volunteer recruitment for hospice palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cocreation has the potential to engage people with lived and living experiences in the design and evaluation of health and social services. However, guidance is needed to better include people from equity‐deserving groups (EDGs), who are more likely to face barriers to participation, experience ongoing or historical harm, and benefit from accessible methods of engagement. Objective: The aim of this international forum (CoPro2022) was to advance a collective vision for equity‐based cocreation. Design: A participatory process of engagement in experiential colearning and arts‐based creative and reflective dialogue. Visual prototypes were created and synthesised to generate a collective vision for inclusive equity‐based cocreation. Setting and Participants: The Forum was held at the Gathering Place by the Grand River in Ohsweken, Ontario, Canada. A total of 48 participants attended the forum. They were purposely invited and have intersecting positionalities (21 academic experts, six experience experts, 10 trainees, and 11 members of EDGs) from nine countries (Bangladesh, Botswana, Canada, England, Italy, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Sweden). CoPro2022 Activities: CoPro2022 was an immersive experience hosted on Indigenous land that encouraged continuous participant reflection on their own worldviews and those of others as participants openly discussed the challenges and opportunities with engaging EDGs in cocreation activities. Visual prototypes and descriptions created in small groups were informed by participants' reflections on the panel presentations at the Forum and their own experiences with equity‐based cocreation. Following the event, the authorship team inductively coded themes from the prototype descriptions and met to discuss the cross‐cutting themes. These informed the design of an illustrated collective vision for Equity Based Co‐Creation (EqCC). Results: Six prototypes were cocreated by each small group to illustrate their vision for EqCC. Within these, four cross‐cutting themes were identified: (i) go to where people are, (ii) nurture relationships and creativity, (iii) reflect, replenish and grow, (iv) and promote thriving and transformation. These four themes are captured in the Collective EqCC Vision to guide a new era of inclusive excellence in cocreation activities. Patient or Public Contribution: Service users, caregivers, and people with lived experience were involved in leading the design of the CoPro2022 and co‐led the event. This included activities at the event such as presenting, facilitating small and large group discussion, leading art‐based activities, and reflecting with the team on the lessons learned. People with lived experience were involved in the analysis and knowledge sharing from this event. Several members of the research team (students and researchers) also identified as members of EDGs and were invited to draw from their personal and academic knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Community and healthcare organizations have not historically collaborated effectively, leaving gaps in the continuum of care for survivors of sexual assault. These gaps are particularly acutely felt by transgender (trans) survivors, who experience additional barriers to care and face higher rates of sexual assault. To bridge these gaps and enhance the provision of comprehensive support for trans people, we developed an intersectoral network of trans-positive community and hospital-based organizations in Ontario, Canada. As part of a baseline evaluation of the network, we conducted a social network analysis to determine the extent and nature of collaboration between members within and across these two sectors. Using a validated social network analysis tool (PARTNER survey), data were collected from June 22 to July 22, 2021. The extent of collaboration was examined by relationship type: intrasectoral (same sector) and intersectoral (different sectors). The nature of collaboration was examined using relational scores (value: power, level of involvement, potential resource contribution; trust: reliability, mission congruence, openness to discussion). Fifty-four community organizations (65.9% of 82 invited) and 24 hospital-based violence treatment centers (64.9% of 37 invited) responded. The majority of collaborations were within, rather than across, the two sectors: of all 378 collaborations described, 70.9% (n = 268) were intrasectoral collaborations and 29.1% (n = 110) were intersectoral collaborations. Intersectoral relationships were characterized by lower scores for level of involvement, trust, reliability, and mission congruence than intrasectoral relationships, but higher scores for power. These findings were shared in a virtual consultation session of key stakeholders, in which some participants expressed "surprise" and concern for the lack of collaboration and character of relationships across sectors. Recommendations to increase intersectoral collaboration, which included intersectoral program planning and service design and supporting increased opportunities for intersectoral training and knowledge exchange, are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy / Journal Canadien de la Pharmacie Hospitalière is the property of Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This mixed-methods study examined the feasibility of implementing a new six-month, theory-based, interprofessional education intervention, and explored its effects and impact on collaborative practice among home care providers caring for older adult stroke survivors (≥65) with multiple chronic conditions. The evaluation utilized a qualitative descriptive and one group repeated measures design which included participant questionnaires, focus groups and field notes. Participants included 37 home care providers (registered nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, personal support workers, care coordinators, and their supervisors) in Ontario, Canada. The intervention was feasible and acceptable to home care providers. Perceived benefits included improved communication and collaboration within teams, enhanced role understanding, increased learning with and from each other, and increased appreciation of all team members' expertise. From 3 to 6 months post initial IPE training, there was a statistically significant improvement in three domains of collaborative practice as measured by the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (communication/information exchange; community linkage and coordination of care; decision-making and conflict management) and one domain of collaborative practice, as measured by the 19-item Team Climate Inventory (task orientation). Implications for implementing interprofessional education in home care practice settings are described. Further testing in other populations and settings is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Quality integrated care, which involves primary care and mental health clinicians working together, can help identify and treat adolescent depression early. We explored systemic barriers to quality integrated care at the provincial level in Ontario, Canada using a learning system approach. Methods: Two Ontario Health Teams (OHTs), regional networks designed to support integrated care, completed the Practice Integration Profile (PIP) and participated in focus groups. Results: The OHTs had a median PIP score of 69 out of 100. Among the PIP domains, the lowest median score was case identification (50), and the highest one was workspace (100). The focus groups generated 180 statements mapped to the PIP domains. Workflow had the highest number of coded statements (59, 32.8%). Discussion: While the primary care practices included mental health clinicians on-site, the findings highlighted systemic barriers with adhering to the integrated care pathway for adolescent depression. These include limited access to mental health expertise for assessment and diagnosis, long wait times for treatment, and shortages of clinicians trained in evidence-based behavioral therapies. These challenges contributed to the reliance on antidepressants as the first line of treatment due to their accessibility rather than evidence-based guidelines. Conclusion: Primary care practices, within regional networks such as OHTs, can form learning systems to continuously identify the strategies needed to support quality integrated care for adolescent depression based on real-world data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Students with disabilities are far less likely than their peers to participate in work-integrated learning (WIL). This gap may contribute to the high levels of unemployment for people with disabilities. Unemployment rates compound when accounting for intersectional identities, with disabled people of color experiencing even higher rates of unemployment. Skill development through opportunities such as WIL is critical to ensure equity -deserving groups can transition successfully from post-secondary institutions into the workforce. Without a transparent, collaborative accommodations process in an environment that is actively reducing stigma and ableism, it is likely students with disabilities will continue to be underrepresented in WIL and the workforce after graduation. This paper presents an overview of disability, barriers to participation, and relevant Canadian legislation. The authors then propose an outline for developing a collaborative accommodations process for WIL opportunities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The virtual conference 'Transforming Care: Supporting Older Adults Post-COVID in Ontario' was held in October 2021. It was organized by Specialized Geriatric Services (SGS) East and held over three half-days. The guiding themes included: The Need, The Innovation, and The Transformation. Over 500 participants heard from -50 clinicians, researchers, administrators, older adults, care partners, and community partners. The pandemic uncovered and exacerbated existing issues and pushed us to explore new ways to support older adults living with complex health conditions. The following key priorities were identified: older adults and their care partners call for personalized care experiences, and a lifespan approach to care delivery; aging in the community remains the most common preference; an integrated community care system that supports aging at-home should be prioritized; care delivery by SGS interprofessional teams and specialists is paramount to providing comprehensive care; building health human resource capacity should be a system priority; and promising innovations should be scaled and spread. Evidence shows that we cannot return to status-quo; post-pandemic planning of both who we serve and how we serve needs to be anchored in system renewal, not just recovery. Renewal means integrating lessons learned during the pandemic into the redesign of our systems of care. Investments in innovative, upstream strategies that support home and community-based care, and target health promotion and prevention are necessary. The provincial and regional infrastructure of SGS has the expertise and capacity to assist Ontario Health Teams in responding to the evolving health and social needs of this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physician assistants (PAs) have been integrated into primary care settings to reduce wait times and to optimize continuity of care. Though previous studies suggest that PA utilization leads to improved healthcare access, few studies have investigated patient experience with primary care PAs in Canada. The objective of this study is to explore patient perspectives on primary care PAs in Ontario. A patient survey was developed and distributed to patients seen by PAs in 4 family medicine practices across Ontario, Canada. Results demonstrate that many patients are highly satisfied with their experience including the PA's ability to address their medical needs, establish rapport, and provide fast access to care (including same-day and after-hours appointments). Despite preferring to see a physician for more complex concerns, participants felt that PAs demonstrate similar medical knowledge, competencies, and scope of practice as family physicians. Patients demonstrated a solid understanding of the PA role and recognized the collaborative PA–physician relationship. These findings describe successful patient awareness and acceptance of the PA profession, largely due to positive PA–patient interactions in family medicine settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Narrative abilities are an important part of everyday conversation, playing a key role in academic settings, at home, and in social interactions. As narrative assessments are an effective method for identifying children falling below age expectations, it has been recommended they be included as a routine part of clinical language assessments. It is important that assessments meet the needs of clinicians and their practice. The current study is a practicebased research partnership, where research questions arose from a partnership with school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Working together, SLPs and researchers evaluated a bespoke narrative retell assessment tool. The current study examined recall of events in two wordless picture books, in order to evaluate story equivalency and determine if the tool was appropriate for progress monitoring. These findings were then used to develop local norms. Method: Two hundred sixty-three students were recruited across 12 schools in kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Students completed the narrative retell task, retelling either One Frog Too Many or Frog Goes to Dinner, followed by answering 10 comprehension questions related to story events. Results: A significant effect of story was found for both main and supporting events recalled, but not for total events recalled. Total events recalled were found to be predicted by grade only. An examination of percent events recalled revealed four main and four supporting events in each story that were potentially misclassified. Reanalysis following reallocation revealed no significant effect of story for main or supporting events recalled. Normative values for each grade were created using percentile ranks of total events recalled. Conclusion: Through a practice-based research partnership, researchers and clinicians worked collaboratively to evaluate a tool, adapt its use, and improve evidence-based practice in a manner that was appropriate and met the needs for the clinical context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcome-based evaluations still dominate in continuing professional development (CPD) despite the availability of evaluation approaches that address program processes and contexts. Our continued reliance on outcomes-based evaluation fails to respect the importance of complexity and the human element of program planning and implementation. Therefore, it is time that the field of CPD embrace complementary approaches to program evaluation that consider the complexity and maturity of programs and their contexts, while providing credible and relevant information to inform strategic decisions regarding the future of a program. Principles-focused evaluation provides a complement to traditional evaluation approaches through the articulation of a program's values that can be actioned. These "actionable values," known as principles, become the focus of the evaluation for the purposes of program decision-making. This paper describes how one CPD program, designed as a response to growing opioid-related harms, adopted a principles-focused evaluation to inform ongoing iteration of the program. The process used to design the principles, how the principles are informing the transportability of the program, and implications for CPD evaluation are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional collaboration has been recognized as valuable for enhancing the effectiveness of health care systems. It holds significant potential as an innovative strategy for addressing challenges within the health care model and workforce, ultimately contributing to the strengthening of the health system and the improvement of outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of a prenatal care protocol on interprofessional collaboration and oral health-related quality of life. The patients were predominantly young and had either incomplete or complete high school education, with no significant differences observed between the test and control groups. Pregnant women in the intervention group demonstrated a greater perception of interprofessional collaboration compared to those in the control group. Furthermore, self-rated oral health and oral health-related quality of life showed improvement post-intervention. The intervention fostered team empowerment, resulting in a reorientation of the work process with increased involvement and collaborative professional interaction, supported by the performance of dental hygienists. The service organization protocol, despite initially causing tensions, ultimately resulted in positive effects on interprofessional collaboration and oral health-related quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of dental hygienists in integrating activities between oral health and multidisciplinary teams, thereby enhancing oral health-related quality of life, and promoting interprofessional collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional education for collaborative practice (IPECP) in pre-licensure education promotes professional and interprofessional socialization. Within IPECP, students develop understanding of their professional role and begin forming an interprofessional identity where collaborative attitudes, behaviours, and skills are cultivated. It is not well understood how oral health students are involved in IPECP and prepared for collaborative practice. This review assessed the literature on IPECP models used within oral health pre-licensure education, guided by the research questions: 1) What IPECP experiences enable professional/interprofessional socialization and interprofessional identity development? 2) What IPECP experiences best enable developing collaborative skills, behaviours, and readiness for collaborative practice? This review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews, PRISMA-ScR, and used an a priori protocol. CINAHL, DOSS, PubMed, and APA PsychInfo databases were searched. Peer-reviewed articles, published within the last 10 years, in English, and specific to IPECP models used in pre-licensure education of oral health students were eligible. Articles (N = 321) were screened by 2 reviewers for title/abstract, followed by full-text review using a critical appraisal tool. Twenty-eight (28) articles were included in the study. IPECP models included case studies, simulation, and clinical practice/service-learning. Hybrid experiences that provided socialization opportunities and experiential learning were most impactful for understanding professional roles and scopes. IPECP beyond a single event/time-point enabled development of collaborative skills and behaviours. Longitudinal exposure to IPECP enhanced students' preparedness for collaborative practice. However, siloed education of students persists, challenging interprofessional identity development. Increased integration of oral health students into health professions IPECP is needed. Revision of IPECP curricular materials to enable students to explore their professional contributions to interprofessional teams is required. IPECP for developing an interprofessional identity in oral health students remains understudied; longitudinal and qualitative analyses are needed to inform impacts and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is known to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction. In primary healthcare (PHC), IPC aims to transform care provision and team functioning, but its implementation is challenging and has yielded mixed results. We aimed to describe the enactment of IPC in PHC settings, particularly as it relates to nurse practitioner (NP) integration. A multisite ethnography involving 6 Canadian PHC clinics was carried out. We conducted 330 hours of direct observation, 23 semi-structured interviews with PHC NPs, informal interviews with key PHC partners, and document analysis. IPC in PHC was found to rest on human and non-human actors that interact in complex ways. Organizational mandates and remuneration models, physical spaces and schedules played a decisive role in the enactment of IPC. Power structures embedded in certain designations (i.e., most responsible provider) or NPs' commitments to physicians' practices stood in contrast with the principles of IPC. NPs enacted various role to develop, enhance, and maintain IPC. Despite shifts in PHC provision, IPC remains poorly defined and precariously sustained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: There is minimal research on the role racism plays in recovery-oriented practice for Black youth. Clinicians' perspectives on building interagency partnerships have been understudied. We sought to characterize and contextualize interagency relationships in the mental health sector in Ontario and explore their impact on mental health provision. Research Design and Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to explore clinicians' perspectives on the collaborative nature of partnerships in the sector. An online survey was disseminated to clinicians in Toronto, Ontario between March 2020 and April 2020 followed by 7 focus groups which were conducted in Toronto between May 2020 and December 2020 with Black youth, caregivers, community, and clinicians. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS and visualized using social network analysis, while Nvivo 12 was used to perform a thematic analysis. Results: Interagency collaboration between mainstream agencies was common. Partnerships between Black and mainstream agencies were infrequent. Most mainstream agencies expressed disinterest in future partnerships with Black agencies. Feelings of unpreparedness among clinicians to provide culturally safe responsive care to Black youth became evident. Conclusions: Project partnerships between mainstream agencies are common. There is a paucity of Black agencies building organizational partnerships with mainstream agencies. There is a limited understanding of the systemic impacts of racism as a barrier to building interagency partnerships and its implications for recovery-oriented practice. The Canadian recovery guidelines do not identify racism as a social determinant of health or discuss potential implications for recovery-oriented practice. They can be strengthened through implementing system-level change and culturally adapted care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The creation of Family Health Teams in Ontario was intended to reconfigure primary care services to better meet the needs of an aging population, an increasing proportion of which is affected by frailty and multimorbidity. However, evaluations of family health teams have yielded mixed results. Methods: We conducted interviews with 22 health professionals affiliated or working with a well-established family health team in Southwest Ontario to understand how it approached the development of interprofessional chronic disease management programs, including successes and areas for improvement. Results: Qualitative analysis of the transcripts identified two primary themes: [1] Interprofessional team building and [2] Inadvertent creation of silos. Within the first theme, two subthemes were identified: (a) collegial learning and (b) informal and electronic communication. Conclusion: Emphasis on collegiality among professionals, rather than on more traditional hierarchical relationships and common workspaces, created opportunities for better informal communication and shared learning and hence better care for patients. However, formal communication and process structures are required to optimize the deployment, engagement, and professional development of clinical resources to better support chronic disease management and to avoid internal care fragmentation for more complex patients with clustered chronic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the perception of African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) religious leaders on HIV vulnerability and their role in HIV prevention among ACB communities in Windsor, Ontario. We conducted one semi-structured focus group discussion with nine Black religious leaders, most of whose congregants are members of the ACB community. Most religious leaders in the focus group had a negative perception of the transmission of HIV, but they acknowledged their own important role in HIV prevention strategies. This role is collaborative in nature, from the stage of designing HIV prevention strategies to implementing prevention messages. The religious leaders noted, however, that some challenges, such as church doctrine and congregational culture, are likely to impede their HIV prevention efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim and objectives: To conduct a diagnostic evaluation of physical restraint practice using the integrated‐Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i‐PARIHS) framework. Background: Evidence indicates that physical restraints are associated with adverse physical, emotional and psychological sequelae and do not consistently prevent intensive care unit (ICU) patient‐initiated device removal. Nevertheless, physical restraints continue to be used extensively in ICUs both in Canada and internationally. Implementation science frameworks have not been previously used to diagnose, develop and guide the implementation of restraint minimisation interventions. Design: A prospective observational study of restrained patients in a 20‐bed, academic ICU in Toronto, Canada. Methods: Data collection methods included patient observation, electronic medical record review, and verbal check with the point‐of‐care nurses. Data were collected pertaining to framework domains of unit culture (restraint application/removal), evaluation capacity (documentation) and leadership (rounds discussion). The reporting of this study followed the STROBE guidelines. Results: A total of 102 restrained patients, 67 (66%) male and mean age 58 years (SD 1.92), were observed. All observed devices were wrist restraints. Restraint application and removal time was verified in 83 and 57 of 102 patients respectively. At application, 96.4% were mechanically ventilated and 71% sedated/unarousable. Nurses confirmed 71% were prophylactically restrained; 7.2% received restraint alternatives. Restraint removal occurred after interprofessional team rounds (87%), during daytime (79%) and following extubation (52.6%). Of the 923 discrete patient observation of physical restraint use, 691 (75%) were not documented. Of the 30 daytime interprofessional team rounds reviewed, physical restraint was discussed at 3 (10%). Conclusion: In this single‐centre study, a culture of prophylactic physical restraint was observed. Future facilitation of restraint minimisation warrants theoretically informed implementation strategies including leadership involvement to advance interprofessional collaboration. Relevance to clinical practice: The findings draw attention to the importance of a preliminary diagnostic study of the context prior to designing, and implementing, a physical restraint minimisation intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health is the property of Canadian Periodical for Community Studies Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Concussion public policies have been developed to address the burden of concussions. The aim of the present study was to examine implementation compliance, barriers, and facilitators of Canada's first concussion public policy, Ontario's Policy/Program Memorandum 158: School Board Policies on Concussion (PPM158). Methods: An electronic survey was sent to 515 randomly selected elementary and high school principals across specific geographic, language, and publicly funded school types in Ontario. Data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: One hundred and thirty‐five principals responded to the survey (26%). Concussion education was provided to teachers in 81% of schools, to students in 83%, and coaches in 79%. Additionally, 89% reported having a return‐to‐learn protocol in place and 90% reported having a return‐to‐play protocol. Implementation barriers included difficulties in providing concussion education to parents (42%), obtaining notes from physicians, and maintaining the volume of documentation. Eighty‐seven percent of respondents believed that PPM158 improves student well‐being. Conclusions: Identified implementation barriers and facilitators can inform concussion policy practices to improve student well‐being. We recommend: (1) an appointed concussion policy lead at each school, (2) electronic documentation, (3) determining the optimal education format to improve parent/guardian education, (4) fostering relationships between schools and health care professionals, and (5) student concussion education in every grade in Ontario schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health is the property of Canadian Periodical for Community Studies Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Psychosocial oncology (PSO) is an interdisciplinary field that is often practised and researched in disciplinary silos. The Interdisciplinary PSO Research Group and Laboratory (IPSORGL) was developed in Ottawa (Ontario) to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and training amongst trainees, healthcare professionals (HCPs), and researchers. Methods: The research team conducted an implementation and outcome evaluation of the IPSORGL. Data were collected using sequential mixed methods, including surveys and interviews. Results: Eight trainees, six HCPs, and five researchers completed the survey. Six trainees and four HCPs participated in an interview. Benefits of the IPSORGL included establishing interdisciplinary connections and collaborations and obtaining unique training in a supportive environment. Challenges included members' differing preferences for meeting formats and content, and difficulties prioritizing the IPSORGL over other academic or clinical demands. Conclusions: The IPSORGL fosters essential interdisciplinary training and collaboration, which bolsters psychosocial oncology research and practice. The sustainability of such initiatives, however, requires formal institutional support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medically trained health professionals have been central to the development of policy responses to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) crisis. In their multiple roles—as clinicians, public health leaders, members of scientific advisory boards, and also as media pundits and health professionals—they have helped shape discourses of science‐based policy options during the first 2 years of the pandemic. In particular, health professionals as a collective voice insisted on the necessity of society‐wide measures of social control to curb the morbidity and mortality of the virus. These measures, in turn, informed the political and moral imagination of the political class, the media and the larger public. Yet, as emerging evidence suggests, measures of social control posed a serious and long‐term risk for health equity. In this discussion piece on the first 2 years of COVID‐related public health directives, we interrogate the tensions that advocating for extensive and protracted measures of social control can pose to the social contract between medicine and society, health equity and democracy. To illustrate these tensions, we discuss the public fallout between vocal members of the OSAT, an ad hoc biomedical‐led organization, and the Government of Ontario in light of the disagreement on the scope of 'stay home' orders to manage the third wave of the pandemic in the Spring of 2021 and, more recently, the mass protest against mass‐scale public health measures in Ottawa, Canada. We argue that while decision making under emergency conditions is a difficult task, the legitimacy of the social contract between medicine and society depends on medical experts' judicious exercise of public health ethics principles. We offer a set of recommendations for building a more collaborative response to future health crises. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional peer-to-peer (IP-P2P) pedagogy involves students from different health care disciplines with no formal teaching experience teaching peers with a similar education level. Students learn with, from, and about each other. This study assessed changes in dental hygiene students' knowledge, skills, and perceptions of nutrition education before and after implementation of an IP-P2P educational model at The University of British Columbia (UBC). A pre/post study design examined changes in students' knowledge, skills, and perceptions from baseline traditional lecture-style classes (2019-2020) to post-implementation of phases 1 (2020-2021) and 2 (2021-2022) of a new technology-enhanced blended IP-P2P curriculum. Phase 1 included viewing, discussing, and assessing nutrition knowledge using video-based case studies online; phase 2 added a P2P component to the video-based cases. UBC's Behavioural Research Ethics Board (H20-00358) approved this project. A 5-point Likert scale was used in the baseline (n = 23) and phase 1 (n = 25) surveys that showed a range of responses to 15 variables, including dental hygiene students' working knowledge of nutrition, attitudes towards peer-to-peer education, and ability to work on interdisciplinary health care teams. The statements in phase 1 with highest agreement were as follows: I had to prepare for class to be successful (p = 0.006); Teaching and learning methods promoted understanding and application of key concepts (p = 0.042); and Course work facilitated critical thinking and problem solving (p = 0.001). In phase 2, all respondents reported positively to the IP- P2P component added to the curriculum. Open-ended comments from all 3 years of students recommended more opportunities for case discussions and interactions in the IP-P2P component to better understand scopes of practice. Students' responses indicated the blended curriculum improved student outcomes while retaining interest in both online and classroom settings. The addition of the IP-P2P model encouraged interprofessional collaboration among health care students while developing their problem-solving skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional education (IPE) prepares health science learners to be collaborative health practitioners upon graduation. However, sustained team-based IPE is challenging given the crowded and differing schedules of academic programs. Even so, a Canadian health sciences faculty established a longitudinal, cohort, team-based curriculum focussed on the 6 Canadian interprofessional collaborative (IPC) competency domains. Students from 9 programs engaged in IPC learning teams over the first 2 years of their education. This study evaluated that curriculum using Barr's modification of Kirkpatrick's education evaluation typology, specifically learner satisfaction and modification of attitudes/perceptions and acquisition of knowledge/skill. Students, aside from quantitative means of assessment, reflected in writing once at the end of each term using Driscoll's reflection prompts: What, So What, and Now What. Informed by Charmaz's grounded theory process, 4 researchers identified preliminary emergent themes through constant comparison analysis based on the first and fourth reflections. Five consistent themes emerged: 1) being together is better; 2) filling knowledge gaps; 3) embracing diversity; 4) finding one's voice; and 5) developing a sense of interprofessionality. A medical student wrote: "One feeling elicited while working with my team was gratefulness...being a physician involves understanding other supports for patients.such as dental hygienists and dentists." An occupational therapy student said: "... nurses, physiotherapists, and dental hygienists always have something unique to add...leads us to find the best care for the clients." The cohort, team-based, longitudinal curriculum allowed learners to learn with, from, and about each other while engaged in their uniprofessional curricula. Early exposure to IPC contributed to the students' development of an interprofessional identity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is growing consensus that interprofessional primary care is key to delivering timely, coordinated, and comprehensive care, especially in the older patient population who often live with complex and chronic needs. Despite significant investments in reforming health systems toward interprofessional primary care, there is a paucity of evidence describing the importance of interprofessional primary care for older patients and physicians. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to understand the use and utility of interprofessional primary care for older patients and family physicians from the perspective of different stakeholders within primary care in Ontario, Canada. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews (including 16 older patients, six family physicians, three primary care managers) and a focus group with 13 patient representatives were conducted. Our study found that while the benefits of interprofessional primary care teams for family physicians were clearly emphasized, stakeholders consistently reported that older patients often appeared to be unaware of the presence of, or roles played by, non-physician healthcare professionals in their clinic. Better transparency and education regarding available services and roles of different care providers may allow for more optimal use of interprofessional family medicine clinics by patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We developed and implemented a person-centered navigation model integrated in primary care where patients were referred to the Access to Resources in the Community (ARC) study by their primary care provider (PCP). The purpose of this paper is to explore the lay navigators' learning experience as reflected in their journals and present implications for education and health promotion practice. Sixty-six journal entries from two navigators were analysed. To code the data, we used a newly developed framework based upon the theory-informed lay navigator training programme. Five unique themes were identified: 1) Gaining and Building Trust, 2) Developing Empathy, 3) Experiencing Hope and Optimism, 4) Feeling Helplessness and 5) Celebrating Gains and Successes. The five themes identified paint a sequential picture of the journey of leading individuals from primary care to health and social community resources. This innovative approach has expanded our understanding of how navigators learn in practice, more specifically how they learn from patients and how they develop knowledge and skills in person-centered care. Incorporating reflective journaling as a regular practice provides situational awareness and leads to enhanced learning. Practising person-centered care also develops when a trusting and empathetic relationship is established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on William Osler Hospital System (Osler) being a mid-sized hospital system in Brampton, Ontario having three sites and roughly 5,000 FTEs. Topics include use of an authentication protocol like Zscaler making complete sense from the perspective of the IT Department; and IP sharing creating specific challenges when working with ebook and eresource subscriptions.

Introduction: In response to the challenges of the traditional mental health system for youth both in Canada and abroad, models of integrated youth services (IYS) that span the integration of mental health, health, substance use, eucation, employment, peer support, and navigation into ‘one-stop shops’ are being established nationally and internationally. IYS models, however, need to be better described and evaluated to inform the replicability of this approach in other jurisdictions. Description: This paper describes the implementation of an IYS in a small urban city and rural county in Ontario, Canada, including insights from key informants into barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned. Discussion: This evaluation identified a number of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the IYS model in this specific context. Implementation facilitators included youth and family engagement, network partner collaboration, leadership, governance structure, community enthusiasm and support, and collaborative funding models. Barriers to implementation included the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health restrictions, the diverse needs of youth, change management, sustainable funding, and transportation. Lessons learned: By establishing a shared vision of delivering youth services across the integrated network, and engaging youth early in the process of model development, IYS have the potential to transform the service system for youth and their families. Meeting the diverse needs and challenges of youth who live in rural or small urban communities will enhance service delivery and experience for young people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multisectoral approaches to health are collaborations between stakeholders across multiple sectors, usually formed to address issues that affect health but go beyond the purview of one particular sector. The significance of multisectoral partnerships to attain health equity has been widely acknowledged. However, the extent which equity can be attained depends upon the perceptions of various stakeholders. We examine how multisectoral partnerships promoting healthy eating and active living conceptualized and employed an equity lens in their work. Method: This study is part of a larger pan-Canadian mixed-method research and knowledge sharing program entitled MUSE (Multisectoral Urban Systems for health and Equity in Canadian cities). Data collected from both quantitative and qualitative sources for two sites of the MUSE project-Saskatoon and Toronto were analyzed. In the qualitative part, 30 semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from six different multisectoral partnerships based in Saskatoon and Toronto. Data were analyzed in an inductive way. In the quantitative part, a survey with 37 representatives of stakeholder organizations was carried out. Simple descriptive statistics (means and percentages) were used to observe the distribution of data and to complement the qualitative analysis. Results: Equity was not a central component in program design although participants addressing equity, did so by discussing accessibility. How much consideration was given to equity varied as a function of the type of partnership. Most participants emphasized geographical accessibility but a few mentioned financial accessibility. Collaborative leadership style facilitated a participatory decision-making process, and thereby upholding equity in the partnership decision-making process. Communication, networking, and negotiation skills were found to be core competencies of a leader that contributed in upholding equity in partnership dynamics. The study also showed some challenges to embed equity in partnership works, such as the lack of comprehensive understanding of population health and its equity tenet. Conclusions: Findings indicate that multisectoral partnerships aimed at promoting healthy eating and physical activity experience several challenges to attain equity within the partnership as well as in the partnership-based works aimed at reducing health equity in populations. Factors identified can support decision makers commit to and work to attaining equity within their partnerships as well as in the partnership-based work in the community and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Goal‐setting with older adults in home care is often inhibited by a lack of structure to support person‐ and family‐centred care planning, paternalistic decision‐making and task‐oriented delivery models. The objective of this research study was to determine how goal‐setting practices for older adults could be re‐oriented around individuals' self‐perceived goals, needs and preferences. Solution‐focused semi‐structured key informant interviews were conducted with older adult home care clients aged 65 years and older (n = 13) and their family/friend caregivers (n = 12) to explore changes, solutions and strategies for person‐ and family‐centred goal‐setting. Participants were recruited through community advertisement in a single region of Ontario, Canada between July and October of 2017. Interviews were conducted in‐person and were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was guided by a multi‐step framework method. Four themes emerged from the data: (1) seeing beyond age enables respect and dignity; (2) relational communication involves two‐way information sharing; (3) doing 'with' instead of doing 'for' promotes participation and (4) collaboration is easier when older adults and caregivers lead the way. Older adults and caregivers want to be actively engaged in dialogue during care planning to ensure their preferences are included. The findings from this study add the direct perspectives of older adults and their caregivers to literature on solutions to address ageism, improve communication, enhance information sharing and promote collaboration in geriatric care. Next steps for this work could involve testing the changes, solutions and strategies that emerged to determine the effect on person‐ and family‐centred home care delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pandemic has uncovered a broad lack of understanding of the role of the Medical Director in Canadian Long-Term Care (LTC) Homes. Our objectives were to identify the current demographics and practices of LTC Medical Directors, discover how the pandemic affected their practice habits, and inform the content of the Ontario Long-Term Care Clinicians Medical Director Course, to ensure that Medical Directors have the requisite knowledge of the responsibilities of their role. Email survey. Medical directors in Ontario long-term care homes. Responses to open-ended, close-ended, multiple-choice, and free-text questions. A total of 156 medical directors (approximately 24%) completed the survey. Ninety-four percent were family physicians. Approximately 40% of participants had been a medical director for fewer than 5 years, whereas more than 11% have been in the role for greater than 30 years. More than 60% spend fewer than 2 hours per week in their administrative role, with fewer than 23% completing formal evaluations of the attending clinicians. Greater than 75% are either satisfied or extremely satisfied in their medical director role, citing excellent engagement and collaboration with team members. Feelings of dissatisfaction were associated with pandemic stress, increased hours and responsibility, inadequate remuneration, lack of ability to make decisions and lack of acknowledgement that physicians add value to the interdisciplinary team. It is clear that medical directors are in a unique position to impact the care of residents within LTC. It is imperative to engage medical directors as integral members of the LTC health care team. This can be achieved by acknowledging their medical expertise for improving outcomes, providing them with the authority for decision making, compensating them appropriately, and clearly defining the role. By making these changes, we can ensure that there is a higher likelihood to sustain effective medical leadership in LTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increasing prevalence and complexity of re-irradiation cases, there is a need for comprehensive policies and procedures to ensure optimal patient outcomes and minimize risk. A critical incident involving re-irradiation was reported to Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario (OH-CCO) which prompted a review of re-irradiation practices across radiation treatment facilities. The aim of the OH-CCO Re-Irradiation Symposium Webinar was to explore re-irradiation incidents and lessons learned and current re-irradiation practices and processes across the province with the goal of knowledge transfer exchange and best practice sharing. In the context of this webinar, re-irradiation was defined as delivery of a new course of radiation therapy to a previously irradiated volume where there is overlap or potential overlap between the two plans. Prior to the webinar, a pre-meeting survey was circulated to the radiation therapy managers at each of Ontario's radiation treatment facilities. The managers were asked to coordinate one submission per centre in collaboration with the inter-professional team. The survey included questions on re-irradiation policy, gathering radiation treatment history and combining previous and current plans. A 100% response rate (n=15) was achieved. The OH-CCO Re-Irradiation Symposium webinar was held in June 2023. The webinar included an overview of the epidemiology of re-irradiation, a review of the pre-meeting survey results, a summary of the Radiation Incident Safety Committee (RISC) analysis of re-irradiation incidents reported to the National System for Incident Reporting-Radiation Treatment (NSIR-RT), a presentation of a critical incident involving re-irradiation and the resulting quality care review recommendations, and a showcase of re-irradiation processes and learnings from three radiation treatment facilities. The webinar also included four discussion periods where participants could ask questions and share their experiences and challenges with re-irradiation processes. A showing of the recorded webinar was hosted in November 2023 for those unable to attend the live event. The benefits of the webinar included bringing representatives from all radiation treatment facilities to participate in knowledge transfer exchange and best practice sharing, as well as increasing awareness of variation in current re-irradiation processes and challenges with creating or updating these processes. 93% of radiation treatment facilities indicated during the pre-meeting survey that they would be interested in sharing their re-irradiation policy/process with other facilities highlighting an appetite for continued collaboration amongst facilities. The main challenge of the webinar was the size of the group and the virtual setting, which made participation in discussion more difficult and limited the interaction among attendees. Over 180 participants attended the live webinar and/or the showing of the recording. There was representation from each of Ontario's radiation treatment facilities including participants from multiple areas of the multidisciplinary team (i.e. radiation oncologists, medical physicists, clinical specialist radiation therapists, radiation therapists, dosimetrists, clinical educators, radiation nurses, management, students etc.). Opportunities for continued collaboration and best practice sharing have stemmed from this webinar. Suggestions for future symposia topics were raised by the participants; these will be explored by the OH-CCO team. Work is underway to collect re-irradiation policies/processes from each of Ontario's radiation treatment facilities with the goal of developing a recommendation document to support creating or updating these processes to improve their effectiveness. There has also been interest in forming a provincial re-irradiation working group to establish provincial guidelines and promote consensus on re-irradiation practices both clinically and logistically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic gastrointestinal diseases that negatively affect the enjoyment of food and engagement in social and cultural gatherings. Such experiences may promote psychosocial challenges, an aspect of IBD often overlooked and under‐supported in clinical settings and research. Objectives: This study explored the psychosocial experiences that young adults with IBD have with food via a qualitative patient‐led research process. Methods: Trained patient researchers conducted this study by engaging peers via semi‐structured interviews and focus groups in a three‐step co‐design process. Participants (n = 9) identified the research topic (SET), explored the topic and identified emerging themes (COLLECT), refined themes and made recommendations for healthcare system change (REFLECT). Results: Themes that emerged included: 'Experimenting with Food', 'Evolution Over Time', 'Diet Changes are Emotional' and 'Role of Stigma'. Participants identified the significance and frustrations of repeated testing and experimenting with food compatibility, and noted nuances in food relationships as they gain knowledge and experience over time. They emphasized the importance of maintaining a sense of hope throughout and wished to impart this to newly diagnosed patients. Conclusion: Participants experience numerous psychosocial challenges as they strive to manage their diet, noting gaps in support available from IBD practitioners. Participants made practical recommendations for healthcare system change to improve patient outcomes, highlighting the importance of sharing stories and collaboratively including patients in the development of new services and protocols. Authors recommend further research in this area to build a body of knowledge and support that helps IBD patients maintain hope while navigating challenges with food. Patient or Public Contribution: The first four authors on this paper were the lead researchers in this study's design and analysis and identify as patients; they conducted the research with this identity at the forefront following a peer‐to‐peer research model. These authors were mentored by patient researchers who also contributed to the manuscript, and the research process itself was co‐lead and directed by other patient participants and consultants. Results and recommendations coming from this paper came directly from patient participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides results from interviews and a focus group conducted at two different points in time in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, which explored impacts of the pandemic and adaptation among water advocacy organizations in southern Ontario, Canada. Our findings show that despite the destabilizing and sometimes devastating impact of COVID-19 on grassroots organizations and their programs, by disrupting business as usual the pandemic also created the conditions for experimentation, innovation, the establishment of new capacities and strategic foci. In this paper, we share descriptive narratives from water activists in our geographic area about how they adapted and innovated their work despite the challenges of the pandemic. Our findings illustrate and add nuance to themes emerging in the literature about the impacts of the pandemic on environmental advocacy groups and other nonprofit organizations, and generate new themes for further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The primary care sector is uniquely positioned to lead the coordination of providers and organizations across health and social care sectors. This study explores whether intraorganizational (professional) integration within a primary care team might be related to interorganizational integration between primary care and other community partners involved in caring for complex patients. Methods: Two care coordination initiatives (Health Links) were selected - one led by a primary care team with a high level of intraorganizational integration as assessed by the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT), and the other led by a primary care team with a low level of intraorganizational integration. A case study design involving a social network approach was used to assess interorganizational integration across six types of relationships including regular contact, perceived level of integration, referrals, information sharing, joint care planning, and shared resources. Results: Compared to the high-CPAT led case, the low-CPAT led case had higher density (more ties among organizations) in terms of regular contact, integration, and sharing of resources, whereas the opposite was true for the referral, information sharing, and joint care planning networks. Network centralization (extent to which network activity is influenced by one or a group of organizations) was higher for the high-CPAT case compared to the low-CPAT case in the integration, referrals, and joint care planning networks, while the low-CPAT case had higher centralization with regard to regular contact, information sharing, and shared resources. Conclusion: The interplay between intra and interorganizational integration remains unclear. We found no consistent differences in the patterns of ties across the six types of networks examined between the two cases. Assessing changes in network metrics for different organizations in each case over time, and supplementing network findings through in-depth interviews with network members are key next steps to consider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the article, the authors discuss the ongoing interprofessional cooperation among family physicians (FP) and midwives, as well as the sustainability of maternity services at the West Parry Sound Health Centre (WPSHC) in northern Ontario. Other topics include the factors affecting intrapartum care services in the area like the retirement of FPs and shortages of nurses, and the support by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MPHLTC) on the cooperation.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health is the property of Canadian Periodical for Community Studies Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)