Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the negative impact of moral injury on nurses' well-being. However, there is a lack of research about generational differences among nurses, particularly on newer nurses who have been identified as having a higher rate of intention to leave. Objective: This study examines generational differences among nurses on moral injury, well-being, resilience, and intention to leave their nursing position and profession. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from registered nurses in clinical practice in Ohio between July and August 2021. Data on demographics, moral injury, resilience, and well-being were collected using an online survey. Participants were categorized into 4 generational groups based on their age in 2021: Baby Boomers (57-75 years old), Generation X (42-56 years old), Generation Y (27-41 years old), and Generation Z (12-26 years old). Descriptive and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and analysis of variance, were employed for analysis. Results: Significant generational differences were found in years of clinical experience, moral injury, resilience, and well-being. Baby Boomers reported higher well-being and resilience and lower moral injury. Notably, the intention to leave the profession was more strongly associated with well-being and moral injury levels than with the years of experience or generational group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that interventions to improve nurse retention should prioritize enhancing well-being and addressing the root causes of moral injury. Tailored strategies addressing the needs of different generations are necessary for mitigating the adverse effects of current healthcare challenges on nurse attrition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Supporting the sleep health of surrogate decision-makers of patients in the intensive care unit is a research priority. However, few studies have approached sleep health as a multidimensional construct, instead focusing on 1 or 2 dimensions in isolation. Objective: To holistically examine the sleep health (satisfaction, timing, efficiency, duration) of surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. Methods: This secondary analysis involved surrogate decision-makers of incapacitated intensive care unit patients at a tertiary medical center in northeastern Ohio (n = 19). Sleep-health data were captured by means of a subjective scale (satisfaction) and objectively (timing, efficiency, duration) by means of a wrist-worn accelerometer (Actiwatch Spectrum Plus; Philips Respironics). Upon enrollment, participants completed the satisfaction scale and wore the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus for 3 consecutive days. Descriptive statistics of the study variables were evaluated. Results: A minority (15%) of the sample reported poor sleep satisfaction. Sleep timing variables were comparable to those found in other adult studies. Participants averaged approximately 6 hours of sleep per day with an average sleep efficiency of 83.7%. Conclusions: Despite adequate satisfaction scores, intensive care unit surrogate decision-makers' sleep duration is inadequate and sleep efficiency is suboptimal. Sleep-health interventions may be needed in this at-risk population. Future research should consider the impact of surrogate decision-maker sleep health on their capacity to serve in the surrogate decision-maker role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Family intensive care unit (ICU) syndrome, a comorbid response to another person's stay in the ICU, is characterized by emotional distress, poor sleep health, and decision fatigue. Objectives: This pilot study examined associations among symptoms of emotional distress (anxiety and depression), poor sleep health (sleep disturbance), and decision fatigue in a sample of family members of patients in the ICU. Methods: The study used a repeated-measures, correlational design. Participants were 32 surrogate decision makers of cognitively impaired adults who had at least 72 consecutive hours of mechanical ventilation within the neurological, cardiothoracic, and medical ICUs at an academic medical center in northeast Ohio. Surrogate decision makers with a diagnosis of hypersomnia, insomnia, central sleep apnea, obstructive sleep apnea, or narcolepsy were excluded. Severity of symptoms of family ICU syndrome was measured at 3 time points in 1 week. Zero-order Spearman correlations of the study variables were interpreted at baseline and partial Spearman correlations of study variables were interpreted 3 days and 7 days after baseline. Results: The study variables showed moderate to large associations at baseline. Baseline anxiety and depression were associated with each other and with decision fatigue at day 3. Baseline sleep disturbance was associated with anxiety, depression, and decision fatigue at day 7. Conclusions: Understanding the temporal dynamics and mechanisms of the symptoms of family ICU syndrome can inform clinical, research, and policy initiatives that enhance the provision of family-centered critical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine by nurses lags behind that of other health care professionals with minimal empirical evidence to understand this phenomenon. In this secondary analysis, we examined nurses' individual and work-related characteristics and their association with COVID-19 vaccination status. Alumni of three Ohio nursing colleges and members of a professional organization were invited to complete questionnaires from June through August 2021. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between nurse characteristics and vaccination status. Among 844 respondents, 754 (80.30%) had received at least one dose of the vaccine. Older age, having a bachelor's degree or higher, and working in critical care were associated with vaccination. Providing direct care for COVID-19 patients in the last 7 days and a higher perception of one's work being affected by COVID-19 were significantly associated with being vaccinated, whereas prior COVID-19 infection was inversely associated with vaccination status. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccine uptake among nurses is influenced by a host of factors related to virus knowledge, beliefs, and risk perceptions. Awareness of these factors can aid the development of interventions to increase nurses' acceptance of vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine relationships between moral injury (MI), well-being, and resilience among staff nurses and nurse leaders practicing during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. BACKGROUND: Attention to MI among health professionals, including nurses, increased in 2021, particularly related to the pandemic. Few studies examined MI, well-being, and resilience; even fewer provided implications for leadership/management. METHODS: The sample included 676 RNs practicing in Ohio. The electronic survey included assessments of MI, well-being, and resilience distributed via the Ohio Nurses Association and the schools of nursing alumni Listservs. RESULTS: There was a significant association between MI and negative well-being and negative association between MI and resilience. Differences were observed between staff nurses and leaders. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study relating MI, resilience, and well-bring among nurses and nurse leaders during the pandemic. There is a need for additional research to further our understanding about nurses' health and well-being during the pandemic and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is commonly used clinically and scientifically among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients. The validity of the HADS has been scrutinized, but its use among surrogate decision makers has not been examined. Objective: To examine the structural validity of the HADS. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of data obtained from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial of a decision support intervention. Participants were recruited from 6 intensive care units at a tertiary medical center in Northeast Ohio. Participants were adult surrogate decision makers for critically ill, cognitively impaired adults who were not expected to be discharged from the intensive care unit within the subsequent 48 hours. The fit of 2-factor, 3-factor, and bifactor structures of the HADS was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The bifactor structure, possessing a general psychological distress factor and anxiety and depression group factors, showed a superior fit and met a priori thresholds for acceptable model fit. The general psychological distress factor accounted for more than 75% of the common variance in the HADS items. Conclusion: Confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence supporting a bifactor structure of the HADS. In this sample, the instrument validly measures psychological distress rather than distinct symptoms of anxiety and depression. Replication of these results is encouraged, and use of alternative measures is recommended when measuring distinct symptoms of anxiety and depression among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]