Search

Objective: Failures in nontechnical skills (NTS) rather than technical expertise are frequently at the root of medical errors in the operating room (OR). NTS are the cognitive (decision making and situation awareness) and interpersonal (communication and teamwork) skills that are recognized but are not formally addressed in surgical training. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of simulation-based training (SBT) on NTS performance of surgical residents during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)., Setting: The study was performed in a simulated OR at the Center for Medical Education and Innovation at Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH. The simulated OR was arranged with standard equipment for LC, a high-fidelity patient simulator, and a real OR team., Design: General surgical residents completed 2 identical SBT sessions. For each session, residents were briefed on the LC case, completed the case in the simulated OR, and debriefed their videotaped simulation performance with a content expert. The video recordings were reviewed and the residents' NTS were scored using a perioperative time-out checklist and an intraoperative checklist for LC by 4 raters who were blinded to both the residents' postgraduate year level and the order of the videotaped simulation sessions., Results: Residents showed a significant improvement in completeness of the perioperative time-out checklist from session 1 (mean score = 1.27 ± 1.00) to session 2 (mean score = 5.00 ± 1.28), p < 0.001. Residents' scores on the intraoperative checklist also improved from session 1 to session 2, p < 0.05. Overall, residents felt that the simulation was a valuable teaching and training tool and recommend that it be incorporated into residency training., Conclusion: SBT appears to be an effective technique for improving NTS of surgical residents during the perioperative and intraoperative phases of surgery. As surgical proficiency is 75% nontechnical and 25% technical, it could be reasonably argued that improved NTS of surgeons could improve surgical outcomes., (Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hyperphosphatemia in end-stage renal disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Because phosphorus is not effectively dialyzed, dietary adherence remains a significant problem. Previous studies have examined the health belief model, but none have looked at stages of change and dietary adherence in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD)., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: Three dialysis centers in Columbus, Ohio, between August 2012 and March 2013., Subjects: English-speaking patients age 18 or older on HD without dementia or developmental delay., Intervention: None., Main Outcome Measure: Associations between dietary adherence based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model (stages of change) and serum phosphorus levels via a conceptual model incorporating modifying factors and individual health beliefs., Results: Ninety-five patients completed the survey; 59 (62%) endorsed adherence to a low-phosphorus diet and 32 (34%) had phosphorus values ≤5.5 mg/dL. Modifying factors associated with diet adherence included nonminority status odds ratio (OR), 95%CI 8.99 (1.08-74.60), greater level of education OR 18.23 (1.62-205.00), better quality of life OR 9.28 (1.35-63.71), and time on dialysis OR 1.04 (1.01-1.07). Individual health beliefs associated with diet adherence included perceived benefits OR 3.18 (1.47-6.88) and self-efficacy OR 1.22 (1.09-1.38). Modifying factors associated with phosphorus control included: age OR 0.94 (0.90-0.99), minority status OR 0.11 (0.02-0.68), greater level of education OR 6.60 (1.41-31.04), knowledge about chronic kidney disease OR 1.48 (1.03-2.13), and time on dialysis OR 0.98 (0.96-0.99). Individual health beliefs associated with phosphorus control included self-efficacy OR 1.08 (1.01-1.16)., Conclusion: HD clinicians and educators may obtain better results with dietary adherence and phosphorus control if they focus not only toward disease and dietary education but also on understanding modifying factors and individual health beliefs. Assessing where the patient is with regard to stages of change may assist health care providers in better matching interventions that build patients' self-efficacy., (Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether a standardized patient encounter and self-guided tutorial would improve first-year residents' self-efficacy for disclosing medical errors., Method: In 2011, 55 first-year residents participated in a simulation in which they disclosed an error to a standardized patient playing the part of a family member. Residents completed the simulation twice, four weeks apart, and completed presession knowledge and self-efficacy (based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [ACGME] core competencies) assessments and repeated the self-efficacy assessment after the sessions. Residents reviewed the videos of their encounters either alone (self-debrief) or with a faculty observer (faculty debrief). Between sessions, they completed a self-paced learning tutorial. Two external faculty also rated the residents' performances using videos of the encounters., Results: Residents' self-efficacy significantly increased from a Session 1 pretest mean (standard deviation) score of 119.6 (26.6) to a Session 2 posttest score of 150.3 (24.9) for all ACGME competencies (P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.19). The external reviewers' ratings provided additional, objective support for residents' improvement on questions assessing ACGME competencies (P = .001). Comparisons of the self-efficacy of residents in the self-debrief versus faculty debrief groups yielded no significant differences on any ACGME competencies., Conclusions: Timely, explicit, and empathetic disclosure of medical errors to patients and family is essential to maintaining trust and is an important part of patient-centered medical care. This intervention easily could be replicated in other settings and is applicable to many members of the health care team, not just to residents.

In 2006, Ohio added questions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's yearly Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey to assess epilepsy prevalence. Ninety-seven of 5506 respondents reported a history of epilepsy, yielding a weight-adjusted prevalence rate of 1.48% (95% CI=0.9-2.1), which is supportive of previous state-based epidemiology estimates. Persons with a history of epilepsy report double the rate of cigarette smoking than the population without epilepsy. Persons with both active epilepsy and a history of epilepsy report poor physical and mental health. Health screening behaviors were comparable to or higher than those of the population without epilepsy. Data from previous BRFSS surveys are used to identify major risk factor trends, as well as to explore the health promotion implications for people with epilepsy. Assessments reveal a need for smoking cessation and increased physical activity for persons with a history of epilepsy in Ohio.