Search

The purpose of this article is to analyse how education and schooling took part in handling the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in eight European countries (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway, Poland and Sweden). The focus is on primary education and on decisions to close schools, or not. Our research was informed by assemblage theory in order to analyse how different components interacted in developing societal responses to mitigate the pandemic. The research was designed as a comparative case study of practical reasoning in diverse contexts. Data sources were the mass media and statements from governments and authorities. Our analyses showed that decisions to close schools, or not, were based on two alternative discourses on schooling. Closing primary schools was a preventive measure underlined by discourses of schools as places for infection. Keeping primary schools open was underlined by a discourse in which schools were conceived of as a place for social supportive measures and caring. Furthermore, the closing alternative was often combined with attempts to replace school practices by distance learning or computerized instruction. Legal constitutions and lawmaking were of significant importance in selecting discourses and the relative impact of different components, mostly political or medical, in responding to the pandemic.

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim The Nordic countries have similar health care systems and registries simplifying epidemiological research. Differences in treatment traditions can, however, hamper the possibility to assess results and to harmonize control arms in joint randomized trials. In the process to set up a Nordic multi-center randomized trial regarding use of nasogastric tube (NG-tube) decompression after esophagectomy, we aimed to investigate perioperative routines in 12 University Hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. Methods All Nordic University Hospitals were contacted regarding a Nordic randomized controlled trial exploring effects and complications associated with the use of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy for cancer. Those who chose to join the trial were sent a questionnaire regarding surgical and perioperative routines. Results Twelve centers with a combined catchment area of 16 million inhabitants and an annual volume of 400 esophagectomies joined the trial network. All but one used totally minimally invasive or hybrid surgical approach. All 12 centers reported routine use of NG-tube and 5 employed continuous suction. The NG-tube was removed between 3 and 7 days postoperatively. A routine pylorus drainage procedure was reported from two centers. Jejunostomy was used universally in 5 centers and selectively in 6 centers. One center did not use jejunostomy. Conclusion Differences in perioperative care after esophagectomy is apparent in the Nordic countries, highlighting the need for high-level evidence regarding these practices. A unified approach may facilitate clinical trial initiatives. There is a paucity of evidence regarding optimal NG-tube use after esophagectomy for cancer and a randomized trial investigating this issue is under way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cone–rod dystrophy in the standard wire-haired dachshund (SWHD) is inherited as a simple autosomal recessive trait and the recently discovered mutation is widespread within the SWHD population in Norway and other Scandinavian countries. The gene frequency was estimated to be 4.8%. On the basis of the assumption that the size of the ancestral haplotype around a mutation is inversely correlated with the number of generations since the mutation arose, we have found that the mutation is of a relatively recent origin. The conserved haplotype was found to be 8 Mb in size and therefore we estimate that the mutation arose roughly eight generations (approximately 37 years) ago. This indicates that the mutation arose after breed separation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal time to surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer is unknown and has traditionally been 4-6 weeks in clinical practice. Observational studies have suggested better outcomes, especially in terms of histological response, after prolonged delay of up to 3 months after nCRT. The NeoRes II trial is the first randomised trial to compare standard to prolonged TTS after nCRT for oesophageal cancer. Patients with resectable, locally advanced oesophageal cancer were randomly assigned to standard delay of surgery of 4-6 weeks or prolonged delay of 10-12 weeks after nCRT. The primary endpoint was complete histological response of the primary tumour in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC). Secondary endpoints included histological tumour response, resection margins, overall and progression-free survival in all patients and stratified by histologic type. Between February 2015 and March 2019, 249 patients from 10 participating centres in Sweden, Norway and Germany were randomised: 125 to standard and 124 to prolonged TTS. There was no significant difference in complete histological response between AC patients allocated to standard (21%) compared to prolonged (26%) TTS (P = 0.429). Tumour regression, resection margins and number of resected lymph nodes, total and metastatic, did not differ between the allocated interventions. The first quartile overall survival in patients allocated to standard TTS was 26.5 months compared to 14.2 months after prolonged TTS (P = 0.003) and the overall risk of death during follow-up was 35% higher after prolonged delay (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.95, P = 0.107). Prolonged TTS did not improve histological complete response or other pathological endpoints, while there was a strong trend towards worse survival, suggesting caution in routinely delaying surgery for >6 weeks after nCRT. • The optimal timing of surgery after completed nCRT for oesophageal cancer is not known. • Merely based on observational studies clinical practice has moved towards prolonged delay of surgery for up to 12 weeks. • This randomised controlled trial compared standard 4-6 weeks' TTS to prolonged delay of 10-12 weeks. • No significant differences in histological complete response, tumour regression or complete tumour resections were found. • A strong trend of worse overall survival was found after prolonged TTS, suggesting caution in routinely delaying surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection causes increased morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to answer the following questions: Does the prevalence of chronic infection with PA differ between the CF centres in Scandinavia? Which differences exist concerning segregation and treatment of PA? Methods: 989 patients (86%) from all eight CF-centres in Scandinavia were included. Demographic and clinical data, including PA colonisation status based on cultures and serology, were recorded at inclusion. The patients were followed prospectively for 1 year, recording number of days with anti-PA antibiotic treatment. Results: In all pancreatic insufficient (PI) patients (n =890) the prevalence of chronic PA infection at each centre ranged from 25.8% to 48.9%, but were not significantly different. In PI patients <19 years the prevalence was 14.5% in Copenhagen compared to 30.9% in the Swedish centres pooled (p =0.001). In intermittently colonised PI patients <19 years the median number of days per year on anti-PA antibiotics was almost 6 times higher in Copenhagen (mean 86 (110), median 61 days) compared to the Swedish centres pooled (mean 27 (52), median 11 days) (p =0.037). The pulmonary function was similar. Conclusions: It is possible to maintain a very low prevalence of chronic PA infection in CF patients <19 years. We speculate that this was most likely due to a very intensive treatment of intermittently colonised patients with inhaled anti-PA antibiotics over prolonged periods of time in some centres. Since lung function was similar in centres with less intensive use of inhaled antibiotics, studies comparing different treatment modalities and other parts of CF care are needed to define the best clinical practice, including how to use antibiotics in the most rational way. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]