Search

Because chest roentgenograms are the most common radiological procedure, they represent a considerable use of resources. Because the usefulness of chest radiography is frequently disputed, it is mandatory to investigate whether or not this use of resources can be defended in terms of clinical utility. The current study was performed as an outcome analysis to assess the clinical utility of chest radiography for monitoring patients in general practice (GP). One year of chest radiography referrals from a municipality practice, comprising a total of 55 patients, were prospectively studied. Prior to the referrals, questionnaires were filled in with indications and expected results. After the examination, the radiological results were assessed regarding clinical utility. All 55 patients were carefully monitored by the same GP. The most frequent reason for referral was infectious disease. Only in 5 patients was the radiology report without value. In the 29 patients with a negative report, it was considered of value. In 7 of these 29 patients the ongoing treatment was altered. The subjective value of the radiology reports were considered to be high. The clinical utility was good, both when receiving positive and negative answers. Of special interest was the negative answers as 7 patients actually changed treatment. The clinical utility was considered high enough to justify the costs. Good access to radiology for GPs is both cost-saving and cost-effective.

Considerable interest has been devoted to automatic daylight film processing systems (ADS) because of their potentials in saving money by decreasing the need for dark-room personnel. In 1982 a new centralized department of diagnostic radiology became operational at Haukeland University Hospital, and six ADS were installed 1983-1984. After 4 years in use the ADSs have been found reliable with few technical errors.

Even though high technology accounts for less than 1% of health care costs in industrialized countries, radiology is often blamed for their escalation. In a squeezed health care economy it is important to know the real cost of diagnostic radiological procedures in order to set priorities and realistic budgets, and to bill (actually or fictively) referring departments, physician's patients, insurance companies etc., and to demonstrate real costs of radiology for politicians and clinicians. The so-called Radiology Points used in the Nordic countries are in our opinion not adequate as basis for "price tags", even if to some extent they do reflect work and expenses involved in an examination. The real costs of ultrasonography (US) and excretory urography (UG) of the upper urinary tract have been compared in a study being performed to determine whether US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease. The cost of US is 53% (high osmolar contrast media) or 27% (anionic contrast media) of UG. If US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease the cost savings will be dramatic, especially if low osmolar or anionic contrast media are routinely used.

A total of 754 persons randomly selected from the age group 55-64 years were invited by letter to take part in a screening for hematuria, proteinuria and glucosuria. Each person was asked to provide one sample of morning urine and immediately mail it to the laboratory. A total of 413 persons (55%) responded. Two dipsticks: BM-Test-5L and a new single strip for hematuria determination preliminary named BM 33075 were used, both manufactured by Boehringer Mannheim GmbH. The test strips gave positive reaction for hematuria in 21 persons (5.1%), for proteinuria in 14 persons (3.4%), and for glucosuria in six persons (1.5%). All persons with positive tests were invited to follow-up investigations. In the hematuria group we found one person with a malignant disease, 13 with benign conditions and in seven persons we found no reason for the hematuria. Among those with proteinuria one person had a nephritis. Four persons with glucosuria knew about their diabetes mellitus. The cost of the screening was NOK 99 per participant.

Considerable savings in cost and some reduction in gonad dose and contrast medium allergy can be expected if excretory urography can be replaced by real-time ultrasonography as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease. For one year, all patients referred for excretory urography (UG) are first examined with real-time ultrasonography (US) to establish whether UG can be completely replaced by US, or the indications for which US should be the first examination of choice. The results in 200 consecutive patients indicate that both methods sometimes fail, but not in the same patients. A combination of the two may be unbeatable, but uneconomical. The results obtained over one year may give the answer. Hopefully studies at other centres will be initiated to increase the size of the case material.

High technology is frequently blamed as a main cause for the last decade's disproportionate rise in health expenditure. Total costs for all large diagnostic and therapeutic appliances are typically less than 1% of annual expenditure on health care. CT, DSA, MRI, interventional radiology, ESWL, US, mammography, computers in radiology and PACS may save 10-80% of total cost for diagnosis and treatment of disease. Expenditure on high technology is in general vastly overestimated. Because of its medical utility, a slower deployment cannot be desirable.