Search

Aims: To determine the frequency and survival of the various types of uterine sarcoma in the total population of Norway and evaluate histopathological prognostic factors in order to identify risk groups. Methods and results: Histopathological review of all uterine sarcoma cases reported to the Norwegian Cancer Registry during 1970–2000 was undertaken. Survival dates were provided by The Cancer Registry. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated. The log rank test was used for univariate analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression model for multivariate evaluation of survival. Stage of disease was the most important prognostic factor for all tumour types. Tumour size and the mitotic index (MI) were significant prognostic factors ( P < 0.0001) in leiomyosarcomas confined to the uterus and allowed for separation into three risk groups with marked differences in prognosis. The prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcomas confined to the uterus was related to MI ( P < 0.0001) and tumour cell necrosis ( P < 0.004). Combining these parameters allowed for separation into three risk groups with marked difference in prognosis. In adenosarcomas, tumour cell necrosis was the only significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: There are marked differences in survival between uterine sarcoma types. Leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas can be divided into different groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The DoMore-v1-CRC marker was recently developed using deep learning and conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections, and was observed to outperform established molecular and morphological markers of patient outcome after primary colorectal cancer resection. The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical decision support system based on DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers to facilitate individualised selection of adjuvant treatment.Methods: We estimated cancer-specific survival in subgroups formed by pathological tumour stage (pT<4 or pT4), pathological nodal stage (pN0, pN1, or pN2), number of lymph nodes sampled (≤12 or >12) if not pN2, and DoMore-v1-CRC classification (good, uncertain, or poor prognosis) in 997 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer considered to have no residual tumour (R0) from two community-based cohorts in Norway and the UK, and used these data to define three risk groups. An external cohort of 1075 patients with stage II or III R0 colorectal cancer from the QUASAR 2 trial was used for validation; these patients were treated with single-agent capecitabine. The proposed risk stratification system was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. We similarly evaluated a risk stratification system intended to reflect current guidelines and clinical practice. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival.Findings: The new risk stratification system provided a hazard ratio of 10·71 (95% CI 6·39-17·93; p<0·0001) for high-risk versus low-risk patients and 3·06 (1·73-5·42; p=0·0001) for intermediate versus low risk in the primary analysis of the validation cohort. Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survival was 97·2% (95% CI 95·1-98·4; n=445 [41%]) for the low-risk group, 94·8% (91·7-96·7; n=339 [32%]) for the intermediate-risk group, and 77·6% (72·1-82·1; n=291 [27%]) for the high-risk group. The guideline-based risk grouping was observed to be less prognostic and informative (the low-risk group comprised only 142 [13%] of the 1075 patients).Interpretation: Integrating DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers provided a clinical decision support system that risk stratifies more accurately than its constituent elements, and identifies substantially more patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with similarly good prognosis as the low-risk group in current guidelines. Avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients might be safe, and could reduce morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs.Funding: The Research Council of Norway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Novel immune checkpoint-based immunotherapies may benefit specific groups of prostate cancer patients who are resistant to other treatments., Methods: We analyzed by immunohistochemistry the expression of B7-H3, PD-L1/B7-H1, and androgen receptor (AR) in tissue samples from 120 prostate adenocarcinoma patients treated with radical prostatectomy in Spain, and from 206 prostate adenocarcinoma patients treated with radical prostatectomy in Norway., Results: B7-H3 expression correlated positively with AR expression and was associated with biochemical recurrence in the Spanish cohort, but PD-L1 expression correlated with neither of them. Findings for B7-H3 were validated in the Norwegian cohort, where B7-H3 expression correlated positively with Gleason grade, surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, and CAPRA-S risk group, and was associated with clinical recurrence. High B7-H3 expression in the Norwegian cohort was also consistent with positive AR expression., Conclusion: These results suggest distinct clinical relevance of the two immune checkpoint proteins PD-L1 and B7-H3 in prostate cancer. Our findings highlight B7-H3 as an actionable novel immune checkpoint protein in prostate cancer., (© 2021 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)