Search

The frequency of extreme storm events has significantly increased in the past decades, causing significant damage to European forests. To mitigate the impacts of extreme events, a rapid assessment of forest damage is crucial, and satellite data are an optimal candidate for this task. The integration of satellite data in the operational phase of monitoring forest damage can exploit the complementarity of optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) open datasets from the Copernicus programme. This study illustrates the testing of Sentinel 1 and Sentinel 2 data for the detection of areas impacted by the Vaia storm in Northern Italy. The use of multispectral Sentinel 2 provided the best performance, with classification overall accuracy (OA) values up to 86 percent; however, optical data use is seriously hampered by cloud cover that can persist for months after the event and in most cases cannot be considered an appropriate tool if a fast response is required. The results obtained using SAR Sentinel 1 were slightly less accurate (OA up to 68 percent), but the method was able to provide valuable information rapidly, mainly because the acquisition of this dataset is weather independent. Overall, for a fast assessment Sentinel 1 is the better of the two methods where multispectral and ground data are able to further refine the initial SAR-based assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Snow cover is a key hydrological variable, critical to understanding water cycles and informing management decisions around resource extraction and recreational activities. Remote sensing open-access data and cloud-based computing platforms are two innovative tools for snow cover estimation. In this paper, we present SnowWarp, a processing framework that uses Google Earth Engine and the R programming languages to combine Landsat 30 m with MODIS 500 m satellite imagery and produce daily-30-m spatial resolution snow cover data anywhere globally. SnowWarp was applied in an alpine catchment in Northern Italy from 2000-2019 and validated using hydrometeorological datasets. Strong correlations between snow cover and ground data were found with correlations in terms of R up to −0.84 for temperature, −0.17 for precipitation, 0.74 for snow depth, and −0.43 for streamflow. The SnowWarp tool is an open-source framework enabling users to map fine spatial and temporal dynamics of snow cover to the ecosystem and hydrological monitoring. • The new open-source SnowWarp tool, utilizing Google Earth Engine and R is presented. • Daily snow cover data at 30 m spatial resolution can be calculated globally. • SnowWarp exploits MODIS and Landsat remote sensing data and implements a dynamic time warping algorithm. • SnowWarp products were generated and tested in an Alpine area in Northern Italy. • Snow cover dynamics were related to different hydro-meteorological variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mapping forest disturbances is an essential component of forest monitoring systems both to support local decisions and for international reporting. Between the 28 and 29 October 2018, the VAIA storm hit the Northeast regions of Italy with wind gusts exceeding 200 km h−1. The forests in these regions have been seriously damaged. Over 490 Municipalities in six administrative Regions in Northern Italy registered forest damages caused by VAIA, that destroyed or intensely damaged forest stands spread over an area of 67,000 km2. The present work tested the use of two continuous change detection algorithms, i.e., the Bayesian estimator of abrupt change, seasonal change, and trend (BEAST) and the continuous change detection and classification (CCDC) to map and estimate forest windstorm damage area using a normalized burned ration (NBR) time series calculated on three years Sentinel-2 (S2) images collection (i.e., January 2017–October 2019). We analyzed the accuracy of the maps and the damaged forest area using a probability-based stratified estimation within 12 months after the storm with an independent validation dataset. The results showed that close to the storm (i.e., 1 to 6 months November 2018–March 2019) it is not possible to obtain accurate results independently of the algorithm used, while accurate results were observed between 7 and 12 months from the storm (i.e., May 2019–October 2019) in terms of Standard Error (SE), percentage SE (SE%), overall accuracy (OA), producer accuracy (PA), user accuracy (UA), and gmean for both BEAST and CCDC (SE < 3725.3 ha, SE% < 9.69, OA > 89.7, PA and UA > 0.87, gmean > 0.83). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]