Search

Abstract: The impacts of different crop rotation systems with their corresponding management practices on grain yield, greenhouse gas emissions, and fertilizer nitrogen (N) and irrigation water use efficiencies are not well documented. This holds especially for the North China Plain which provides the staple food for hundreds of millions of people and where groundwater resources are polluted with nitrate and depleted through irrigation. Here, we report on fertilizer N and irrigation water use, grain yields, and nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions of conventional and optimized winter wheat–summer maize double-cropping systems, and of three alternative cropping systems, namely a winter wheat–summer maize (or soybean)–spring maize system, with three harvests in two years; and a single spring maize system with one crop per year. The results of this two-year study show that the optimized double-cropping system led to a significant increase in grain yields and a significant decrease in fertilizer N use and net greenhouse gas intensity, but the net greenhouse gas N2O emissions plus CH4 uptake and the use of irrigation water did not decrease relative to the conventional system. Compared to the conventional system the net greenhouse gas emissions, net greenhouse gas intensity and use of fertilizer N and irrigation water decreased in the three alternative cropping systems, but at the cost of grain yields except in the winter wheat–summer maize–spring maize system. Net uptake of CH4 by the soil was little affected by cropping system. Average N2O emission factors were only 0.17% for winter wheat and 0.53% for maize. In conclusion, the winter wheat–summer maize–spring maize system has considerable potential to decrease water and N use and decrease N2O emissions while maintaining high grain yields and sustainable use of groundwater. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We monitored soil respiration (Rs), soil temperature (T) and volumetric water content (VWC%) over four years in one typical conventional and four alternative cropping systems to understand Rs in different cropping systems with their respective management practices and environmental conditions. The control was conventional double-cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize in one year - Con.W/M). Four alternative cropping systems were designed with optimum water and N management, i.e. optimized winter wheat and summer maize (Opt.W/M), three harvests every two years (first year, winter wheat and summer maize or soybean; second year, fallow then spring maize - W/M-M and W/S-M), and single spring maize per year (M). Our results show that Rs responded mainly to the seasonal variation in T but was also greatly affected by straw return, root growth and soil moisture changes under different cropping systems. The mean seasonal CO2 emissions in Con.W/M were 16.8 and 15.1 Mg CO2 ha−1 for summer maize and winter wheat, respectively, without straw return. They increased significantly by 26 and 35% in Opt.W/M, respectively, with straw return. Under the new alternative cropping systems with straw return, W/M-M showed similar Rs to Opt.W/M, but total CO2 emissions of W/S-M decreased sharply relative to Opt.W/M when soybean was planted to replace summer maize. Total CO2 emissions expressed as the complete rotation cycles of W/S-M, Con.W/M and M treatments were not significantly different. Seasonal CO2 emissions were significantly correlated with the sum of carbon inputs of straw return from the previous season and the aboveground biomass in the current season, which explained 60% of seasonal CO2 emissions. T and VWC% explained up to 65% of Rs using the exponential-power and double exponential models, and the impacts of tillage and straw return must therefore be considered for accurate modeling of Rs in this geographical region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) is a crucial nutrient that requires careful management in intensive cropping systems because of its diverse beneficial and detrimental effects. Here we propose the concept of theoretical N rate (TNR) to answer the important question of how much fertilizer N should be applied to intensive systems based on the N fluxes due to transformation processes in the soil–crop–environment continuum. We define TNR as the theoretically calculated fertilizer N rate with the quantitative relationships of the core N fluxes among fertilizer N, soil N and crop uptake N in the crop root zone to obtain high target yield, maintain soil N balance and minimize environmental risk. We deduced one basic mathematical expression (Nfert =Nuptake −Nstraw +Nfert3) and two simplified expressions [Nfert =(Nuptake −Nstraw)/(1−Coeff); Nfert ≅Nuptake] for calculating the TNR. These expressions do not need much field experimentation or elaborate soil and plant testing to obtain information on crop N demand and soil N supply, and are simple to implement in farming practice to provide a very cost-effective approach. We consider this scheme to be a useful contribution to rational fertilizer practice, especially in developing countries where other N recommendation systems are usually not available and agricultural extension services are poorly developed or absent. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Heavy rainfall and irrigations during the summer months in the North China Plain may cause losses of nitrogen because of nitrate leaching. The objectives of this study were to characterize the leaching of accumulated N in soil profiles, and to determine the usefulness of Br− as a tracer of surface-applied N fertilizer under heavy rainfall and high irrigation rates. A field experiment with bare plots was conducted near Beijing from 5 July to 6 September 2006. The experiment included three treatments: no irrigation (rainfall only, I0), farmers’ practice irrigation (rainfall plus 100mm irrigation, I100) and high-intensity irrigation (rainfall plus 500mm irrigation, I500), with three replicates. Transport of surface-applied Br− and NO3 − (assuming no initial NO3 − in the soil profile) and accumulated NO3 − in soil profiles were all simulated with the HYDRUS-1D model. The model simulation results showed that Br− leached through the soil profile faster than NO3 −. When Br− was used as a tracer for surface-applied N fertilizer to estimate nitrate leaching losses, the amount of N leaching may be overestimated by about 10%. Water drainage and nitrate leaching were dramatically increased as the irrigation rate was increased. The amounts of N leaching out of the 2.1-m soil profile under I0, I100 and I500 treatments were 195±84, 392±136 and 612±211kgNha−1, equivalent to about 20±5%, 40±6% and 62±7% of the accumulative N in the soil profile, respectively. N was leached more deeply as the irrigation rate increased. The larger amount of initial accumulated N was in soil profile, the higher percentage of N leaching was. N leaching was also simulated in summer under different weather conditions from 1986 to 2006. The results indicated that nitrate leaching in rainy years were significantly higher than those in dry and normal years. Increasing the irrigation times and decreasing the single irrigation rate after fertilizer application should be recommended. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Recovery of residual nitrogen (N) from the subsoil by maize (Zea mays L.) was studied by injecting 15N-labeled nitrate at 110 cm for treatments with and without N fertilizer in a calcareous soil on the North China Plain. The results show that the recovery of 15N-labeled nitrate diffusing in the 90- to 130-cm soil horizon was 11.9% with N fertilizer application and 6.7% without N application in maize. Nitrogen fertilizer applied to topsoil stimulated growth of maize roots in the subsoil, thus increasing the recovery of 15N-labeled nitrate. In the relatively dry growing season in this experiment, the 15N-labeled nitrate did not move downward because there was no downward water flow at 110 cm. Hence, under dry weather conditions, the maize crop can re-utilize a small part of the residual soil nitrate in deep soil layers. Most of the nitrogen uptake was in the 0- to 80-cm layer during the experiment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]