Search

Background: This study aimed to identify the most common types of nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the variations in the most common NTDCs by patient age groups and rural or urban locations and the impact of COVID-19 on emergency department (ED) visits for NTDCs in North Carolina., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective data analysis of ED data from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiology Collection Tool. The authors estimated the proportions of NTDCs of all ED visits in 2019 and 2021 and ranked the proportions of the major categories of NTDCs by age groups and rural or urban locations. They used a multiple logistic regression model to assess the impact of COVID-19 on NTDCs., Results: By the first diagnosis, the proportion of NTDCs dropped from 1.1% in 2019 to 0.99% in 2021 (P < .001). Caries was specified as the third most common NTDC. Oral infection was the top NTDC among young (≤ 17 years) and older patients (≥ 65 years). No significant differences were found in NTDCs between rural and urban areas (P = .68). Children younger than 2 years (adjusted odds ratio, 4.36) and adults aged 18 through 44 years (adjusted odds ratio, 4.54) were more likely to visit the ED for NTDCs than those 75 years and older., Conclusions: The proportion of NTDCs seen at the ED was lower during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 than in 2019. The common NTDCs varied by age group but were similar in rural and urban areas. The most common NTDCs were related to toothache, oral infection, and caries., Practical Implications: More efforts are needed to reduce ED visits for NTDCs., Competing Interests: Disclosures None of the authors reported any disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) completion rate and explore the differences in DSMES completion by different delivery models., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2017-2021 DSMES data at 2 local health departments (LHDs) in Eastern North Carolina. We evaluated DSMES completion by 2 delivery models., Results: From 2017 to 2021, the overall DSMES completion rate was 15.3%. The delivery model of two 4-hour sessions was associated with a higher completion rate than the delivery model of four 2-hour sessions ( P < .05). Patients with less than a high school education and without health insurance were less likely to have completed their DSMES training ( P < .05)., Conclusion: The DSMES completion rate at LHDs in North Carolina is very low. A delivery model consisting of 10 hours of education delivered in fewer sessions may contribute to a higher DSMES completion rate, but more research is needed. Targeted programs are needed to engage patients and improve DSMES completion., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to report recent trends in self-reported diabetes self-management education (DSME) participation rates among adults in North Carolina and to compare these rates between rural and urban residents., Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the NC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for the years 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2017, when the survey included the diabetes module. Respondents were classified as having participated in DSME if they answered "Yes" to the question, "Have you ever taken a course or class in how to manage your diabetes yourself?" We used the Rural Urban Continuum Code to classify urban and rural residence. The study sample included 4368 adults 18 years or older with self-reported diabetes. We assessed the changes in DSME participation from 2012 to 2017. We used multiple logistic regression modeling to assess the association between rural residence and DSME participation. All analyses were conducted in Stata 14 and accounted for the survey design of the BRFSS. Statistical significance was set at P < .01., Results: Overall, the DSME participation rates decreased slightly in the study period, from 55.8% in 2012 to 55.6% in 2013 to 56.5% in 2015 to 52.1% in 2017. By rural-urban residence, the rates were 52.3% versus 57.8% in 2012, 54.0% versus 56.5% in 2013, 48.8% versus 62.0% in 2015, and 46.7% versus 56.1% in 2017. The multiple logistic regression model results showed that rural residents were less likely to have participated in DSME (adjusted odds ratio = 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.94) than urban residents. Adults with higher income and education levels were also more likely to have participated in DSME (P < .01)., Conclusions: The recent BRFSS data showed that the DSME participation rate declined slightly in North Carolina. There were persistent rural-urban disparities in DSME participation, with rural residents showing lower rates, and the gaps seemed to be widening., Implications for Policy or Practice: Continuous efforts are needed to bring more American Diabetes Association/American Association of Diabetes Educators programs to rural communities and assist persons with diabetes to participate in DSME training to reduce the burden of diabetes. Furthermore, those in rural areas may need additional support., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In this study, we sought to elucidate the influenza and pneumonia vaccination practices of adults with diabetes in North Carolina. Methods: Using North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we examined 2011-2018 trend data and demographic and health factors (2014-2018) in influenza (influenza vaccine receipt in the past year among adults ages 18+ years) and pneumonia (lifetime pneumonia vaccination receipt for adults ages 65+ years) vaccination adherence. Results: Influenza and pneumonia vaccination adherence rates were consistently higher for adults with versus without diabetes and remained relatively stable over the study period for both groups. Among adults with diabetes, factors associated with higher influenza vaccination rates included non-Hispanic white race, age 65+ years, poorer health, having insurance, and being a non-smoker. Pneumonia vaccination rates among adults with diabetes were higher for non-Hispanic Whites and those in poorer health. Conclusions: Adults with diabetes may be more likely to receive influenza and pneumonia vaccinations compared to adults without diabetes, but these rates remain below recommended levels. African Americans, younger adults, those without health insurance and cigarette smokers are vulnerable to being non-compliant with vaccination recommendations that could reduce their risk of developing and suffering complications from these diseases.

Introduction: Our study aimed to examine the prevalence of chronic pain, its severity, its causes, and coping mechanisms that are used by North Carolina adults in rural, suburban, and urban areas., Methods: We analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's first chronic pain module in 2018, representing 3,598 respondents. Self-reported chronic pain was defined as the affirmative response to the question, "Do you suffer from any type of chronic pain, that is, pain that occurs constantly or flares up often?" We computed prevalence of chronic pain and use of coping mechanisms by rural, suburban, or urban residential status. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between chronic pain and residential location, adjusting for demographic characteristics, employment, and health insurance., Results: In 2018, an estimated 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6%-29.3%) of North Carolina adults experienced chronic pain. Prevalence of chronic pain in rural areas (30.9%) and suburban areas (30.8%) was significantly higher, compared with urban areas (19.6%). Compared with urban residents with chronic pain, those with chronic pain in suburban areas (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.76) and in rural areas (AOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) were less likely to use nonmedication therapies (eg, acupuncture, physical therapy, yoga) and were less likely to use 3 or more types of chronic pain treatment (suburban AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; rural AOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.95)., Conclusion: Our results indicate that persons living in rural and suburban areas may be more likely to have chronic pain and less likely to use nonmedication treatments than those in urban areas.

BACKGROUND Deaths from unintentional opioid overdose have increased markedly over the last decade in North Carolina. In 2017 the state created a North Carolina Opioid Action Plan, which laid out a multisectoral response to the crisis that included the medical community, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and treatment professionals. It also created a website providing county-level data associated with the crisis. Using this publicly available data, we examine trends and associations between opioid-related mortality and strategies to reduce opioid prescriptions, reduce fatality of overdose, and improve treatment and recovery. METHOD We examine yearly trends from 2010-2017 for statewide unintentional opioid-related death rates, prescription of opioid pills, buprenorphine prescription rates, naloxone administrations, and number of Certified Peer Support Specialists. We compare recent opioid-related death rates for 2015-2017 with an earlier period (2010-2012) at the county level, and examine the association between death rates and rates of the supply, treatment, and recovery metrics. RESULTS Trends for all metrics increased from 2010-2017, although the number of opioid pills per capita has declined since 2015. Between 2010 and 2017, 84 of the state's 100 counties experienced an increase in opioid-related mortality. County-level mortality was positively associated with opioid prescription rate (r = +0.12, P = 0.24) and with naloxone administrations (r = +0.20, P = 0.05). Prescription of buprenorphine was associated with a reduction in opioid mortality (r = -0.27, P = 0.01). The effect of Certified Peer Support Specialists was not discernable. LIMITATIONS Data are available for only eight years and aggregated at the county level. Mortality data are based on death certificates using ICD-10 codes from the North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics, Vital Statistics, which may not capture all opioid-related fatalities. Drug-related deaths may involve multiple non-opioid substances; in addition, determining the intent of the deceased individual may be difficult (suicide versus unintentional). Naloxone administration data only includes data from emergency medical services, not community-administered naloxone, because that data was only available for 2013 and later and is based only on self-reports. CONCLUSIONS The potential efficacy of buprenorphine is promising and should be further explored. All interventions should be monitored., (©2020 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND Low health literacy is a recognized contributor to health disparities. Significant proportions of the adult population, especially the underserved, have low health literacy. The purpose of this study was to examine health literacy and its associations with health status and chronic health conditions among North Carolina adults. METHODS The 2016 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System included health literacy questions that focused on accessing and understanding health information. Using these self-reported data, we estimated the prevalence of low health literacy and assessed its associations with general health status and chronic health conditions after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and health care access. RESULTS Overall, 4.8% of adults reported having difficulty getting health information or advice, 7.5% understanding oral information from health professionals, and 8.3% understanding written health information; 14.8% reported having difficulty with at least one of these tasks. The adjusted odds of low health literacy were moderately higher for those who had been diagnosed with the following conditions compared to those not diagnosed: heart attack, coronary heart disease, or stroke (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI=1.33, 2.47); COPD (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.19, 2.34); arthritis (AOR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.32, 2.15); depression (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI=1.52, 2.50); and kidney disease (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.60). LIMITATIONS All data were self-reported. CONCLUSIONS A notable segment of the North Carolina adult population has low health literacy, and those who do are particularly vulnerable to adverse health status. Targeted efforts are needed to identify strategies to improve health literacy and decrease health disparities., (©2020 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND There is limited information available in North Carolina on the current burden of, and racial disparities in, diabetic retinopathy (DR), a major complication associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to describe the overall trend of, and racial/ethnic disparities in, DR among adults with DM in North Carolina. METHODS Data were from 13 waves (2000, 2002-2010, 2012, 2013, and 2015) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The study sample included 16,976 adults aged ≥ 40 years with DM in North Carolina. DR was identified by self-report by the question, "Has a doctor ever told you that diabetes has affected your eyes or that you had retinopathy?" The overall prevalence of DR was assessed during the time period, and was compared between whites and blacks. All analyses were conducted using Stata 13.0. RESULTS The prevalence of self-reported DR in North Carolina decreased from 27.2% in 2000 to 18.3% in 2015, a reduction of 33% (Trend P = .003). The age-adjusted DR prevalence in whites decreased from 21.7% to 17.6% (Trend P = .04), and in blacks from 39.4% to 20.2% (Trend P = .002). The declining rates in DR were not statistically different between whites and blacks ( P = .06). Blacks were more likely to report DR (adjusted odds ratio = 1.20, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.40) during 2000-2015. CONCLUSION The prevalence of self-reported DR in adults with DM declined significantly in North Carolina in the past 15 years. While racial differences in some years appeared to be decreasing, the black-white disparity in DR prevalence during the entire period persisted. Focused efforts on reducing the gap are needed., (©2019 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.)

This analysis assessed trends in measures of diabetes preventive care overall and by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in the North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2000-2015). We found increasing trends in 5 measures: diabetes self-management education (DSME), daily blood glucose self-monitoring, hemoglobin A 1c tests, foot examinations, and flu shots. Non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white respondents showed increases in blood glucose self-monitoring, and a significant time-by-race interaction was observed for annual flu shots. Predisposing, enabling, and need factors were significantly associated with most measures. DSME was positively associated with 7 measures. Expanding access to health insurance and health care providers is key to improving diabetes management, with DSME being the gateway to optimal care.

Descriptions of barriers and facilitators to adoption of evidence-based interventions in local health departments (LHDs) are limited. This study was conducted by the North Carolina Public Health Practice-Based Research Network to identify factors associated with adoption of an evidence-based human papillomavirus video intervention, "1-2-3 Pap NC," in North Carolina LHDs. A sequential mixed-method study design was used. Data from the 2013 National Profile of Local Health Departments were used to test associations between LHD characteristics and adoption of the intervention. Qualitative, key stakeholder interviews with LHD directors provided the context for quantitative data. Data collection and analysis continued from March 3, 2014, to September 15, 2014. Overall, 28% of North Carolina health jurisdictions (33 of 100 counties) implemented the intervention. Of the three channels used to deliver the intervention to clients, most LHDs opted to show the video in the exam room (42%), followed by website/other social media (36%) and video loop in the lobby/waiting room (22%). In logistic regression, gender of the director (female) was significantly and positively associated with adoption of the intervention (AOR=4.44, p<0.05). Being a first-time director was marginally significant (AOR=0.28, p=0.074), suggesting first-time directors were less likely to adopt. Qualitative results suggested that aspects of communication (awareness and positive attitudes) and agency directors' evaluation of resources, balanced against intervention complexity and flexibility, competing priorities, and mandates, influenced adoption. Adoption of evidence-based interventions by LHDs is critical to improve population health. Practice-based research can contribute to understanding facilitators and modifying barriers to this process., (Copyright © 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)