1. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC.
- Author
-
Cohen DA, Setodji C, Evenson KR, Ward P, Lapham S, Hillier A, and McKenzie TL
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Female, Humans, Los Angeles, Male, New Mexico, North Carolina, Observation methods, Observer Variation, Ohio, Philadelphia, Play and Playthings, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Motor Activity, Population Surveillance methods, Public Facilities statistics & numerical data, Recreation
- Abstract
Background: The Systematic Observation of Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) was designed to estimate the number and characteristics of people using neighborhood parks by assessing them 4 times/day, 7 days/week. We tested whether this schedule was adequate and determined the minimum number of observations necessary to provide a robust estimate of park user characteristics and their physical activity levels., Methods: We conducted observations every hour for 14 hours per day during 1 summer and 1 autumn week in 10 urban neighborhood parks: 2 each in Los Angeles, CA; Albuquerque, NM; Columbus, OH; Durham, NC; and Philadelphia, PA. We counted park users by gender, age group, apparent race/ethnicity, and activity level. We used a standardized Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients to test the reliability of using fewer observations., Results: We observed 76,632 individuals, an average of 547/park/day (range 155-786). Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.99. Obtaining a robust estimate of park user characteristics and their physical activity required a schedule of 4 days/week, 4 times/day., Conclusion: An abbreviated schedule of SOPARC was sufficient for estimating park use, park user characteristics, and physical activity. Applying these observation methods can augment physical activity surveillance.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF