Search

While the ERA5 reanalysis is commonly utilized in climate studies on extratropical cyclones (ETCs), only a few studies have quantified its ability in the representation of ETCs over land. To address this gap, this study evaluates ERA5's skill in representing the ETC‐associated 10‐m wind speed and the precipitation in central and eastern North America during 2005–2019. Hourly data collected from ~3000 stations, amounting to around 420 million reports stored in the Integrated Surface Database, is used as reference. For the spatial‐averaged ETC properties, ERA5 shows a good skill for wind speed with normalized mean bias (NMB) of −0.7% and normalized root‐mean‐square error (NRMSE) of 14.3%, despite a tendency to overestimate low winds and underestimate high winds. The ERA5 skill is worse for precipitation than for wind speed with NMB of −10.4% and NRMSE of 56.5% and a strong tendency to underestimate high values. For both variables, the best and worst performance is found in DJF and JJA, respectively. Negative biases are often identified over regions with stronger precipitation/wind speeds, and a systematic underestimation of wind speed is found over the Rockies with complex topography. Compared to the averaged ETCs, ERA5's performance deteriorates for the top 5% extreme ETCs with a stronger tendency to underestimate both wind speed and precipitation (NMB of −10.2% and −22.6%, respectively). Furthermore, ERA5's skill is worse for local extreme values within ETCs than for spatial averages. Our results highlight some important limitations of the ERA5 reanalysis products for studies looking at the possible impacts of ETCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the seasonality of near‐surface wind speeds associated with extratropical cyclones (ETCs) over northeastern North America using a global reanalysis data set during 1979–2020. As opposed to most studies that emphasize winter storms, ETCs during the fall exhibit significantly stronger 10‐m winds over this region due to the slightly stronger continental cyclones and significantly weaker low‐level stability during that time of the year. Also, ETCs favor inland lakes and Hudson Bay during the low‐ice‐content fall season, leading to lower surface roughness. Combining these results, we derive simple linear regressions to predict the 10‐m wind speed given three variables: 850‐hPa wind speed, low‐level Richardson number, and surface roughness length. This formula captures the observed seasonality and serves as a valuable tool for cyclone near‐surface wind risk assessment. Plain Language Summary: Extratropical cyclones can bring powerful winds that can cause severe damage to infrastructure. We find that cyclones with severe winds are the most frequent in the fall season over continental northeastern North America. Three reasons are found responsible: stronger continental cyclones, weaker low‐level atmospheric stability, and the lower surface roughness over lakes and Hudson Bay, where cyclones frequently occur in fall. A simple formula that can effectively assess the near‐surface wind speeds associated with cyclones is derived based on these results. Key Points: Extratropical‐cyclone‐associated 10‐m wind speeds are the strongest in the fall season over northeastern North AmericaBesides stronger continental cyclones and 850‐hPa winds, weaker low‐level stability in fall favors stronger 10‐m wind speeds in this regionLinear regression using 850‐hPa wind, Richardson number, and surface roughness well predicts cyclones' 10‐m wind speeds and seasonality [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]