Search

Background: Health and life expectancy for people with hemophilia have improved significantly in recent years, but we face new challenges, especially in the context of resource-constrained health services.Aim: This paper aims to highlight such challenges and propose practical solutions.Methods: Nine hemophilia specialists from Australia and New Zealand reached consensus on areas of greatest need for improvement in hemophilia care in these countries, based on clinical experience and published data, and agreed on how to address these.Results: Demography, optimizing treatment and assessing treatment success were identified as broad areas of challenge which included: comorbidities in ageing patients; transitioning from pediatric to adult care; equity of care for remote populations; weight-based dosing in obese patients; tailoring prophylaxis; accurate diagnosis of acute joint pain; managing chronic arthropathy; providing psychosocial support; consistency in definitions and assessment; and quantifiable outcome measures. Practice points included increased cross-specialty coordination and including psychologists and rheumatologists as part of comprehensive care teams; close collaboration between pediatric and adult centers to facilitate transition of care; systems such as telehealth that ensure continuity of care for remote populations; using pharmacokinetic data to tailor therapy; rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute joint pain; using data from bleeding registries to assess treatment effects and help with service planning; and ensuring consistency through benchmarking and standardization of HTCs.Summary: Achieving treatment equity, optimal outcomes and cost savings may be possible through investing in national governance structures, expanding the comprehensive model of care and implementing innovative solutions tailored to local needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of bleeds in patients with haemophilia A or B complicated by inhibitors is complex. Recombinant activated Factor VII ( rFVIIa; NovoSeven RT) is an established therapy in these patients. To develop a consensus-based guide on the practical usage of rFVIIa in haemophilia complicated by inhibitors, nine expert haemophilia specialists from Australia and New Zealand developed practice points on the usage of rFVIIa, based on their experience and supported by published data. Practice points were developed for 13 key topics: control of acute bleeding; prophylaxis; surgical prophylaxis; control of breakthrough bleeding during surgery or treatment of acute bleeds; paediatric use; use in elderly; intracranial haemorrhage; immune tolerance induction; difficult bleeds; clinical monitoring of therapy; laboratory monitoring of therapy; concomitant antifibrinolytic medication; practical dosing. Access to home therapy with rFVIIa is important in allowing patients to administer treatment early in bleed management. In adults, 90-120 μg/kg is the favoured starting dose in most settings. Initial dosing using 90-180 μg/kg is recommended for children due to the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of rFVIIa. In the management of acute bleeds, 2-hourly dosing is appropriate until bleeding is controlled, with concomitant antifibrinolytic medication unless contraindicated. The practice points provide guidance on the usage of rFVIIa for all clinicians involved in the management of haemophilia complicated by inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inhibitory antibodies which neutralise factor VIII develop in 10-20% of individuals with inherited haemophilia A and rarely as autoantibodies in normal individuals to cause acquired haemophilia. The antibodies are directed against human factor VIII but cross-react to varying degrees with porcine factor VIII. Porcine factor VIII can be used for treatment in individuals with low cross-reactivity., Aims: To determine the cross-reactivity of factor VIII inhibitors between human factor VIII and porcine factor VIII, in a population of patients with inherited and acquired haemophilia A. Also, to determine whether patients with inherited haemophilia and inhibitors have a higher incidence of factor VIII gene inversion in intron 22., Methods: Samples and data sheets from 43 patients with inherited and ten with acquired haemophilia were submitted from hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Inhibitor levels to human and porcine factor VIII were measured by the Bethesda method in 39 with inherited and nine with acquired haemophilia A., Results: Of 39 patients with inherited haemophilia A, cross-reactivity was 0% in 17 patients, 1-19% in six, 20-39% in 11 and 40-80% in five. In six of nine patients with acquired haemophilia cross-reactivity was < or = 7%. In inherited severe haemophilia A, the frequency of the intron 22 inversion was not greater in 37 study patients than in 28 patients without an inhibitor., Conclusions: Many patients in Australia and New Zealand with inhibitors to human factor VIII presently show a low or absent level of cross-reactivity to porcine factor VIII. These may respond to treatment with this concentrate at least in the short term. There remains a group of patients with high cross-reactivity who will respond only to recombinant factor VIIa or prothrombin complex concentrates.

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeventrademark) was availablefor compassionate use in Australia and New Zealand from 1991 to 1994. Over this period there were 18 treatment episodes in 9 patients, age 8-66 years, with haemophilia A and high titre inhibitors cross-reacting with porcine factor VIII. There were no significant adverse effects. Treatment with rFVIIa resulted in a successful outcome in 8 potentially life-threatening (retroperitoneal, subdural, gastro-intestinal) bleeds. Elective cystoscopy, repair of a cranial flap, yttrium synovectomy and inguinal herniotomy were performed successfully, as was surgical decompression of a flexor pollicis longus bleed. Treatment of a patient with an infected haematoma had limited success, attributed to intermittent suboptimal doses. In 2 patients, satisfactory haemostasis was achieved for multiple dental extractions; subsequent oozing was attributed to suboptimal rFVIIa and/or antifibrinolytic therapy.