Search

Despite the growing size of the academic precariat in the tertiary sector, this exploited group of workers lacks a voice in either their universities or their national union. In this article we draw on our experiences of transitioning from a small activist group to a broader research collective with influence and voice, while forging networks of solidarity. Through reflecting on developing the "Precarious Academic Work Survey" (PAWS), we explore how action research is a viable way of structurally and politically (re)organising academic work. We argue that partnering with changemakers such as unions as co-researchers disrupts their embedded processes so that they may be (re)politicised towards pressing issues such as precarity. Further, we highlight how research can be used as a call to action and a tool to recruit powerful allies to collaborate on transforming universities into educational utopias.

Introduction: The Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC) is responsible for dealing with most complaints from service users resulting from their interactions with a healthcare service provider in New Zealand. We analysed all published reports involving a radiologist or radiology service in order to gain insights that might promote safer working across the radiology community. Methods: We searched the entire HDC online report database choosing a limit of 'radiologist' as occupation. Results: Twenty‐seven investigations were included, published between 1999 and 2021. Seventeen (63%) involved private radiology providers and 10 (37%) involved public providers. Ultrasound featured in 12 cases (44%), x‐ray 6 (22%), CT 5 (19%), mammography 2 (7%), MRI 1 (4%) and interventional 1 (4%). Obstetric ultrasound accounted for 9 (75%) of the ultrasound cases. In 24 (89%) cases, the HDC felt an error had been made. Of the 34 radiologists investigated, 21 (62%) were found in breach of the HDC code, with adverse comment made regarding 4 (12%). A total of 46 incidences of different error types were identified including: communication 14 (30%), perceptual 11 (24%), technical 8 (17%) and interpretative 7 (15%). Forty‐five incidences of contributing factors were identified, including organizational 9 (20%) and clinical information provided 7 (16%). Conclusion: Errors in radiology practice, leading to complaints, are often multifactorial and systemic. Reflection on the myriad of error types and contributing factors (including 'human factors') is imperative to reduce errors. Multifaceted strategies are likely required for radiologists to enhance their systems and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The March 15th terrorist attack started a national dialogue about prejudice in New Zealand. Previous research has investigated attitudes towards Muslims in comparison to ethnic minorities. However, presently, there are no nationally representative studies in New Zealand systematically comparing attitudes to Muslims with attitudes to other religious groups. Here, we present evidence from the New Zealand edition of the International Social Survey Programme module on religion, a national postal survey (N = 1335) collected between September 2018 and February 2019. We assess perceived threat and negativity towards Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and Atheists. We find substantially greater perceived threat and negativity towards Muslims compared with other groups. In particular, older people, New Zealand Europeans, men, and those with more right-wing attitudes report greater threat and negativity towards Muslims. In line with previous studies, higher religious identification and higher education predict greater acceptance. Taken collectively, these results reveal that the Muslim Acceptance Gap in this country is substantial, and greater challenges for acceptance are evident among lower-educated, right-wing, older, secular, and male populations. The magnitude of this gap reveals a substantial challenge to the future of New Zealand where religious and secular people can live without evoking prejudice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]