Search

We examine recent research across countries and cultures in regard to the issues related to the formation of gifted and talented education perspectives, policies, and practices. Many modern cultures and subcultures have developed formal and informal definitions of what it means to be gifted and talented, and when we compare the perceptions, policies, and practices across nations, we discover very different constructs of intelligence and ability. These understandings of giftedness and gifted and talented education can be grouped into four binary dimensions, scholarly versus co-curricular capabilities, aptitude versus achievement, nature versus nurture, and individualistic versus collective, that have significant implications for policy and practice. These constructs can serve as a foundation for countries that are looking to formalize or expand their gifted and talented education models or can be used to challenge the norms of established systems. We put forward recommendations to address some of the challenges in advancing gifted education cross-nationally, an area that is often assumed to introduce risks of enlarging social inequity. We also provide a cross-national matrix that captures known elements of gifted education policies and programs from over 20 subnational jurisdictions, countries, and world regions.

By examining the different methods and processes by which national data gathering agencies compile and submit their findings to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the authors (1) assess the methodological challenges of accurately reporting tertiary completion and graduation rates cross-nationally; (2) to examine the incongruence of existing internationally comparative data on tertiary completion, particularly within the OECD; and (3) to offer policy recommendations for increasing the congruence and comparability of U.S. higher education data with that of other OECD countries (and the rest of the world). (Contains 5 tables, 3 figures, and 4 footnotes.)

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the proportion of patients admitted to hospital with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in whom recent air travel was documented in the medical records. Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of DVT or PE in four hospitals in New Zealand was undertaken. From the medical records information was collected on demographic details, documentation of the presence of risk factors and results of radiological investigations. Strict radiological criteria were applied to ensure that the diagnosis of DVT or PE was firmly established. Results: In 60 of 576 (10.4%) patients with a confirmed venous thromboembolism there was documentation of recent air travel; in 31 of these 60 subjects no other risk factors were recorded. In those cases in whom details of the air travel had been recorded, it had been undertaken in the previous 1 week in 65.0%, and in 43.3% the air travel was of at least 10-h duration. Conclusion: Long distance air travel is an important risk factor for venous thromboembolism requiring hospital admission and represents a significant public health problem in New Zealand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]