Search

In the pediatric population, there is strong evidence to suggest that a delay in treatment results in an increased risk of appendiceal perforation. However, it is not clear whether this delay arises from the parent seeking medical advice, the referring physician seeking surgical consultation, or the surgeon deciding to operate. To resolve this issue, the authors performed a retrospective chart review of all cases of confirmed acute appendicitis that presented to the pediatric surgical service of the Children's Hospital of Buffalo during a 4-year period (January 1990 through December 1993). All children (< or = 16 years of age) were categorized with respect to type of insurance coverage:Medicaid (or uninsured), health maintenance organization (HMO), or private fee-for-service. Their time until emergency room (ER) presentation, operating room (OR) presentation, and hospital discharge were recorded and compared. Their complications and perforation rates also were noted. Two hundred eighty-eight cases were reviewed. The rate of appendiceal perforation was significantly higher among the Medicaid patients (Medicaid, 44%; HMO, 27%; private, 23%; P < .05); their duration of symptoms before presentation was significantly longer (Medicaid, 47.3 +/- 4.1 hours; HMO, 29.3 +/- 1.9 hours; private, 23.1 +/- 2.5 hours; P < .01), and their hospital stay was longer (Medicaid, 7.9 +/- 0.9 days; HMO, 4.8 +/- 0.27 days; private, 4.6 +/- 0.44 days; P < .01). However, there were no significant differences in the time from presentation to the ER until definitive surgery in the OR. Children covered by Medicaid (or uninsured) presented later, had a higher risk of appendiceal perforation, and required a longer hospital stay. The parents of these children either failed to recognize the significance of their children's symptoms, or delayed seeking medical advice because of financial or logistical reasons. The gatekeeper consultation, required by the health maintenance organizations (HMO) did not result in a delay in presentation or have a negative impact on morbidity. Providing easier access to a primary care physician and improving parental health education/awareness may shorten the time until presentation for the uninsured/Medicaid patient.

Only one third of the applicants for training in pediatric surgery obtain a position through the pediatric surgery matching program. In order to identify factors that contribute to a successful outcome, we conducted a retrospective survey of all participants in the matching process for positions during the years 1983 to 1991. This survey was designed to identify characteristics associated with success in the match through comparison of successful and unsuccessful applicants. Significant factors associated with a successful match included: a greater incidence of residency-supported research (P = .012) with a greater number of publications (P = .003) and national presentations (P = .014), specifically at the annual meetings of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (P = .05) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (P = .05). In addition, successful candidates had more contact with (P = .004) and letters of recommendation from (P = .015) well-known pediatric surgeons involved in the general surgical residency program. This information should be invaluable to those counseling medical students and residents interested in a career in pediatric surgery.