1. Effect of physician gender and specialty on utilization of hysterectomy in New York, 2001-2005.
- Author
-
Gretz H, Bradley WH, Zakashansky K, Nezhat F, Bohren DL, Kreiger K, Rubin E, and Sokolow A
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Vaginal methods, Hysterectomy, Vaginal statistics & numerical data, Insurance Claim Reporting statistics & numerical data, Laparoscopy statistics & numerical data, Male, New York, Sex Factors, Hysterectomy statistics & numerical data, Physicians, Women statistics & numerical data, Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of physician gender and specialty on the utilization of hysterectomy and alternatives to hysterectomy., Study Design: The database of Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield was abstracted for all claims relating to a hysterectomy procedure or a hysterectomy-associated diagnosis during the 48 consecutive months May 2001-April 2005. Two hundred ninety-five thousand, one hundred forty-eight claim lines were abstracted and analyzed by CPT and diagnostic grouping codes., Results: One thousand nine hundred seventy-two hysterectomies were performed during the time analyzed, as well as 5077 hysterectomy alternatives. These 7049 procedures represented 2.4% of all coded physician encounters. Male physicians utilize hysterectomy and hysterectomy alternatives at the same rate as female physicians. Physicians who practice gynecology-only or gynecologic oncology utilize laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy more often than their counterparts who practice obstetrics as well as gynecology., Conclusion: Gender does not influence the rate of hysterectomy for similar clinical diagnoses. Subspecialty physicians utilize laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomies more frequently than general obstetricians and gynecologists.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF