Search

Background: Anticoagulated patients are particularly vulnerable to ADEs when they experience changes in medical acuity, pharmacotherapy, or care setting, and resources guiding care transitions are lacking. The New York State Anticoagulation Coalition convened a task force to develop a consensus list of requisite data elements (RDEs) that should accompany all anticoagulated patients undergoing care transitions., Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 15 anticoagulation experts voluntarily completed an iterative Delphi process. Resources were disseminated and deliberated via remote technology, with consensus achieved via blinded electronic polling., Results: The panel reached consensus on a list of 15 RDEs for anticoagulation communication at discharge (the ACDC List). Consensus was rapidly achieved by the full panel on 13 elements, while 3 (2 of which were combined into 1 element) required multiple iterations and achieved consensus with votes from 8 available panelists. The elements encompassed a range of factors, including drug use and indications, previous exposure and duration of therapy, recent drug exposure and laboratory results and expectations for subsequent administration, therapy goals, patient education and comprehension, and expectations for clinical management. Twelve of the elements are applicable to any anticoagulant, and 3 are specific to warfarin., Conclusion: The ACDC List identifies specific pieces of clinical information that a panel of anticoagulant experts agree should be communicated to downstream providers for all anticoagulated patients undergoing care transitions. Additional study is needed to objectively evaluate the ability of existing care systems to communicate the elements and to assess possible relationships between communication of the elements and clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 The Joint Commission. All rights reserved.)

Anticoagulation with warfarin requires frequent evaluation of the international normalized ratio (INR), and less invasive testing devices are available for use by clinicians at the point-of-care (POC) and by patients who self-test (PST). Despite commercial availability and positive results of published studies, evidence suggests that adoption of less invasive (POC/PST) testing in the United States is slow. Considering the equivalence of results and logistical advantages of POC/PST testing, slow uptake may indicate a gap in quality of care warranting evaluation and possibly intervention. This study used Medicare fee for service claims data to explore the uptake of POC/PST INR monitoring across New York State over a 6 year time frame (2006-11), with additional analyses based on beneficiary age, sex, race and ethnicity and income by county. In 2006, only 28.3% of 103,410 analyzable beneficiaries presumed to be chronic warfarin users based on INR testing patterns were monitored by POC/PST, and increased to only 37.6% by 2011. Utilization of POC/PST testing varied widely by county (baseline range 1.2-89.4%), and uptake of these testing modalities in New York State was significantly lower among the very elderly, women, and ethnic minorities. We hypothesize that poor penetration of these less invasive INR testing modalities into highly populated New York City and barriers to POC utilization in long term care facilities may account for a portion of the variability in INR testing patterns observed in this study. However, additional research is needed to further explore whether disparities in warfarin monitoring practices exist.